Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
p.1407 #1Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
nicoimages wrote:
Leica M10 with the Voigtlander 21/4 lens and Voigtlander 35/1.7 LTM lens (last three images)
Needles to say I love using this new Leica camera and so far the only thing I don't like is that there is no longer an electronic level which was really useful particularly for architecture
Looks like you're in luck Nico! According to that "rumors" site, Leica has confirmed that they will be bringing back the spirit level / electronic horizon via a future firmware update.
Leica M10 with the Voigtlander 21/4 lens and Voigtlander 35/1.7 LTM lens (last three images)
Needles to say I love using this new Leica camera and so far the only thing I don't like is that there is no longer an electronic level which was really useful particularly for architecture
Looks like you're in luck Nico! According to that "rumors" site, Leica has confirmed that they will be bringing back the spirit level / electronic horizon via a future firmware update.
Feb 08, 2017 at 01:21 PM
p.1407 #2Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Alpha_Geist wrote:
Needles to say I love using this new Leica camera and so far the only thing I don't like is that there is no longer an electronic level which was really useful particularly for architectureLooks like you're in luck Nico! According to that "rumors" site, Leica has confirmed that they will be bringing back the spirit level / electronic horizon via a future firmware update.
That is great news was secretly hoping that they would not have removed the sensor and it was just a case of having to prioritise the firmware development backlog to get the essential features out first
nicoimages wrote
Leica M10 with the Voigtlander 21/4 lens and Voigtlander 35/1.7 LTM lens (last three images)Needles to say I love using this new Leica camera and so far the only thing I don't like is that there is no longer an electronic level which was really useful particularly for architecture
That is great news was secretly hoping that they would not have removed the sensor and it was just a case of having to prioritise the firmware development backlog to get the essential features out first
Feb 08, 2017 at 04:36 PM
p.1407 #3Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
edwardkaraa wrote:
Be careful that the M10 applies luminance noise reduction in Lightroom automatically. This could be the reason for the softer files. Otherwise, all M cameras have no aa filter, so there shouldn't be any sharpness differences between say M240 and M10.
Definitely not noise reduction as I set that to 0. There is something different about the files in terms of sharpness out of the camera but it is in a good way it is almost like either they are doing something clever to remove the moire and colour aliasing artifacts by pre-processing the DNG files or the new sensor cover glass and microlenses are achieving this.
Be careful that the M10 applies luminance noise reduction in Lightroom automatically. This could be the reason for the softer files. Otherwise, all M cameras have no aa filter, so there shouldn't be any sharpness differences between say M240 and M10.
Definitely not noise reduction as I set that to 0. There is something different about the files in terms of sharpness out of the camera but it is in a good way it is almost like either they are doing something clever to remove the moire and colour aliasing artifacts by pre-processing the DNG files or the new sensor cover glass and microlenses are achieving this.
Feb 08, 2017 at 04:40 PM
p.1407 #5Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
nicoimages wrote:
edwardkaraa wrote
Be careful that the M10 applies luminance noise reduction in Lightroom automatically. This could be the reason for the softer files. Otherwise, all M cameras have no aa filter, so there shouldn't be any sharpness differences between say M240 and M10.Thank you Nico! Now I'm very intrigued. Need to download a few files, or better, renew my subscription at RR
Feb 08, 2017 at 08:25 PM
p.1407 #6Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
nicoimages wrote:
Definitely not noise reduction as I set that to 0. There is something different about the files in terms of sharpness out of the camera but it is in a good way it is almost like either they are doing something clever to remove the moire and colour aliasing artifacts by pre-processing the DNG files or the new sensor cover glass and microlenses are achieving this.
I sure like what I am hearing about the M10. Yet I will still try to hold out a while longer....
edwardkaraa wrote
Be careful that the M10 applies luminance noise reduction in Lightroom automatically. This could be the reason for the softer files. Otherwise, all M cameras have no aa filter, so there shouldn't be any sharpness differences between say M240 and M10.I sure like what I am hearing about the M10. Yet I will still try to hold out a while longer....
Feb 08, 2017 at 09:21 PM
p.1407 #7Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Lovely Stuff
Today, first sun in quite some time, but already another huge storm is here as I post:
Going Up by unoh7, on Flickr
Lift View by unoh7, on Flickr
Blazing by unoh7, on Flickr
Moss by unoh7, on Flickr
I had to travel very light to keep up with this crew, so I grabbed the 35/2.5 Skopar, leaving the 40/2 for a change. I forgot it needs a profile....which?
Today, first sun in quite some time, but already another huge storm is here as I post:
Going Up by unoh7, on Flickr
Lift View by unoh7, on Flickr
Blazing by unoh7, on Flickr
Moss by unoh7, on Flickr
I had to travel very light to keep up with this crew, so I grabbed the 35/2.5 Skopar, leaving the 40/2 for a change. I forgot it needs a profile....which?
Feb 08, 2017 at 10:39 PM
p.1407 #8Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
ZM 50/2
L1001789 by edward karaa, on Flickr
L1001789 by edward karaa, on FlickrFeb 09, 2017 at 03:32 AM
p.1407 #10Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
M262 ZM 50/2
L1001790 by edward karaa, on Flickr
L1001790 by edward karaa, on FlickrFeb 09, 2017 at 08:53 AM
|
p.1407 #11Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Look at ZM 21/4.5 on new Sony Mod A7rii
This is a really famous lens on film. Nobody really uses it alot on digital FF, as even Leica M can't deal well with the super steep ray angles.
That is the one of the few Sony bodies in the world which actually has as little glass in front of the sensor as M9 or 240. In fact it has less. It's a very special modification developed by a tech in Taiwan. Obviously there are no camera profiles or corner fix applied in the shots, which are at 5.6.
Anyway I just wanted to get some input from any who may know this lens, or like Nico, shoot 21 quite a bit. How does the lens seem to be doing?
Here it is on the M9
TY so much guys
Today it rained like crazy and temps came way up. Driving was not a good idea:
Warm Rain by unoh7, on Flickr ZM 35/2
This is a really famous lens on film. Nobody really uses it alot on digital FF, as even Leica M can't deal well with the super steep ray angles.
That is the one of the few Sony bodies in the world which actually has as little glass in front of the sensor as M9 or 240. In fact it has less. It's a very special modification developed by a tech in Taiwan. Obviously there are no camera profiles or corner fix applied in the shots, which are at 5.6.
Anyway I just wanted to get some input from any who may know this lens, or like Nico, shoot 21 quite a bit. How does the lens seem to be doing?
Here it is on the M9
TY so much guys
Today it rained like crazy and temps came way up. Driving was not a good idea:
Warm Rain by unoh7, on Flickr ZM 35/2
Feb 09, 2017 at 11:15 AM
p.1407 #12Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Another stroll around downtown earlier this week....
28cron
28cron
28cron
28cron
 |
||
 |
||
|
28cron
|
||
 |
||
|
28cron
|
||
 |
||
|
28cron
|
||
 |
||
|
28cron
Feb 09, 2017 at 09:57 PM
p.1407 #13Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
A few from my walk around campus with the 246 & 90/2.4
Body Guards by Alpha Geist, on Flickr
by Alpha Geist, on Flickr
by Alpha Geist, on Flickr
Body Guards by Alpha Geist, on Flickr
by Alpha Geist, on Flickr
by Alpha Geist, on Flickr
Feb 09, 2017 at 10:11 PM
p.1407 #16Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Gary, is it my imagination, or are you going for the "M10 look" in the first 3?
They are excellent, but I have to say the colors really remind me alot of you know what
Maybe it's just rubbing off?
Or you are thinking, hey my 240 can do that, no problem.
They are excellent, but I have to say the colors really remind me alot of you know what
Maybe it's just rubbing off?
Or you are thinking, hey my 240 can do that, no problem.
Feb 10, 2017 at 02:45 PM
p.1407 #17Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
uhoh7 wrote:
Gary, is it my imagination, or are you going for the "M10 look" in the first 3?
They are excellent, but I have to say the colors really remind me alot of you know what
Maybe it's just rubbing off?
Or you are thinking, hey my 240 can do that, no problem.
Maybe? Problem is that I'm not really sure what the M10's signature look is.... Not sure what the colors remind you of but the first three I'm not happy with the WB at all really. Just didn't feel like spending too much time in post. No intentional processing on this set though - just that funky color tint/cast/wb I couldn't seem to correct.... I never try to duplicate another sensors output and just try to make the image look pleasing to me.
Gary, is it my imagination, or are you going for the "M10 look" in the first 3?
They are excellent, but I have to say the colors really remind me alot of you know what
Maybe it's just rubbing off?
Or you are thinking, hey my 240 can do that, no problem.
Maybe? Problem is that I'm not really sure what the M10's signature look is....
Not sure what the colors remind you of but the first three I'm not happy with the WB at all really. Just didn't feel like spending too much time in post. No intentional processing on this set though - just that funky color tint/cast/wb I couldn't seem to correct.... I never try to duplicate another sensors output and just try to make the image look pleasing to me.Feb 10, 2017 at 03:36 PM
p.1407 #18Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Used both of my film Ms under low light conditions and developed the films accordingly (see description). I am amazed by the results!
Leica M6, Kodak Tri-X 400 pushed to ISO 1600, developed with Xtol. CV 35/1.2 II lens
Leica M6, Kodak Tri-X 400 pushed to ISO 1600, developed with Xtol. CV 35/1.2 II lens
Leica M6, Kodak Tri-X 400 pushed to ISO 1600, developed with Xtol. CV 35/1.2 II lens
Leica M7, Ilford Delta 3600 used with ISO 3600, developed with Xtol. CV 21/1.8 lens
Leica M7, Ilford Delta 3600 used with ISO 3600, developed with Xtol. CV 21/1.8 lens
Leica M7, Ilford Delta 3600 used with ISO 3600, developed with Xtol. CV 21/1.8 lens
Leica M6, Kodak Tri-X 400 pushed to ISO 1600, developed with Xtol. CV 35/1.2 II lens
 |
||
 |
||
|
Leica M6, Kodak Tri-X 400 pushed to ISO 1600, developed with Xtol. CV 35/1.2 II lens
|
||
 |
||
|
Leica M6, Kodak Tri-X 400 pushed to ISO 1600, developed with Xtol. CV 35/1.2 II lens
|
||
 |
||
|
Leica M7, Ilford Delta 3600 used with ISO 3600, developed with Xtol. CV 21/1.8 lens
|
||
 |
||
|
Leica M7, Ilford Delta 3600 used with ISO 3600, developed with Xtol. CV 21/1.8 lens
|
||
 |
||
|
Leica M7, Ilford Delta 3600 used with ISO 3600, developed with Xtol. CV 21/1.8 lens
Feb 10, 2017 at 06:44 PM
p.1407 #19Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Pending Over Ice II by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
S006, Apo-Elmar S 180/3.5
Feb 11, 2017 at 03:06 AM
