Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
p.1323 #1Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Alma Fermé by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
May 30, 2016 at 11:21 AM
p.1323 #2Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
jojomon11 wrote:
Love that fish image Edward!
Thank you very much Phil!
May 30, 2016 at 12:38 PM
p.1323 #4Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Orange Views by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
May 30, 2016 at 02:25 PM
p.1323 #5Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Along the south coast of Iceland.
Leica M-E, Leica Summilux-M 35mm ASPH. (f11, 6s, ISO 160)
 |
||
 |
||
|
Leica M-E, Leica Summilux-M 35mm ASPH. (f11, 6s, ISO 160)
May 30, 2016 at 04:54 PM
p.1323 #6Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
"Pump up the volume!"
Leica M-E, Leica Summilux-M 35mm ASPH. (f1.4, 1/1000, ISO 160)
|
||
 |
||
|
Leica M-E, Leica Summilux-M 35mm ASPH. (f1.4, 1/1000, ISO 160)
May 30, 2016 at 06:07 PM
p.1323 #7Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
I have been away for a while, and I look forward to looking through the images and posts I have missed. I took my M246 to a patriotic concert last evening, expecting to get lots of shots of the band and concert crowd, but sometimes it is the unexpected that turns out best.
May 30, 2016 at 08:40 PM
p.1323 #8Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
crop from the 135 APO a few nights ago
L1048965-2 by unoh7, on Flickr
I snapped a few more of him (or her)
You can't tell from that shot, but he's just off a very high ridgeline, with huge views
L1048965-2 by unoh7, on Flickr
I snapped a few more of him (or her)
You can't tell from that shot, but he's just off a very high ridgeline, with huge views
May 30, 2016 at 10:00 PM
p.1323 #9Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
uhoh7 wrote:
crop from the 135 APO a few nights ago
https://c5.staticflickr.com/8/7114/27332429276_991858c30f_h.jpg
L1048965-2 by unoh7, on Flickr
I snapped a few more of him (or her)
You can't tell from that shot, but he's just off a very high ridgeline, with huge views
sweet!
pretty sure that's a fox not a coyote btw.
crop from the 135 APO a few nights ago
https://c5.staticflickr.com/8/7114/27332429276_991858c30f_h.jpg
L1048965-2 by unoh7, on Flickr
I snapped a few more of him (or her)
You can't tell from that shot, but he's just off a very high ridgeline, with huge views
sweet!
pretty sure that's a fox not a coyote btw.
May 30, 2016 at 10:23 PM
p.1323 #10Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
sebboh wrote:
https://c5.staticflickr.com/8/7114/27332429276_991858c30f_h.jpg
L1048965-2 by unoh7, on Flickr
I snapped a few more of him (or her)
You can't tell from that shot, but he's just off a very high ridgeline, with huge viewssweet!
pretty sure that's a fox not a coyote btw.
Yes, I think you are right. Blonde locks threw me off, as most here are darker.
Here is where he was:
View to the east, shot from about 50 yards above him:
L1049006 by unoh7, on Flickr
I was walking up to that point when I saw him headed my way, upwind, a small hump between him and my bag. I just had time to dixk down and run and get the 135 on, and there he was. He didn't care to much about me, only making slight detour at the last second.
View to the west about 10 yards from him:
L1049002 by unoh7, on Flickr
uhoh7 wrote
crop from the 135 APO a few nights agohttps://c5.staticflickr.com/8/7114/27332429276_991858c30f_h.jpg
L1048965-2 by unoh7, on Flickr
I snapped a few more of him (or her)
You can't tell from that shot, but he's just off a very high ridgeline, with huge views
pretty sure that's a fox not a coyote btw.
Yes, I think you are right.
Blonde locks threw me off, as most here are darker. Here is where he was:
View to the east, shot from about 50 yards above him:
L1049006 by unoh7, on Flickr
I was walking up to that point when I saw him headed my way, upwind, a small hump between him and my bag. I just had time to dixk down and run and get the 135 on, and there he was. He didn't care to much about me, only making slight detour at the last second.
View to the west about 10 yards from him:
L1049002 by unoh7, on Flickr
May 30, 2016 at 10:32 PM
|
p.1323 #11Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Blown highlights. S-006 and APO Summarit 120
May 31, 2016 at 01:42 PM
p.1323 #12Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Our community pool just opened this past weekend...and all the boys were happy.
Monochrom + 50mm Summicron v5
Monochrom + 50mm Summicron v5
May 31, 2016 at 03:07 PM
p.1323 #13Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Just got my MM back from NJ. I really thought I was having a sensor issue, They cleaned, adjusted and sent bak NO CHARGE.....
May 31, 2016 at 03:11 PM
p.1323 #14Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
How long did it take Alan? A friend of mine sent his in and is having a hard time getting a hold of anyone!
May 31, 2016 at 03:17 PM
p.1323 #15Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
It was just short of 2 months and very little communication. I actually thought they were doing a complete sensor replace. I will get out tomorrow with it but all tests seem to be good. Sensor is clean and everything seems t one working great. I am so happy it is back.
May 31, 2016 at 03:45 PM
p.1323 #16Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
airfrogusmc wrote:
It was just short of 2 months and very little communication. I actually thought they were doing a complete sensor replace. I will get out tomorrow with it but all tests seem to be good. Sensor is clean and everything seems t one working great. I am so happy it is back.
For some reason I'm still lusting for an original MM. Don't know why as I do like my CCD colors but I'd like to shoot the MM for a while for the experience of B&W only.
Was invited to a small venue to listen to some Icelandic music in the Northwest Icelandic town: Stykkishólmur
Leica M-E, Leica Summilux-M 35mm ASPH. (f1.4, 1/45, ISO 640)
Leica M-E, Leica Summilux-M 35mm ASPH. (f1.4, 1/750, ISO 160)
Leica M-E, Leica Summilux-M 35mm ASPH. (f1.4, 1/2000, ISO 160)
It was just short of 2 months and very little communication. I actually thought they were doing a complete sensor replace. I will get out tomorrow with it but all tests seem to be good. Sensor is clean and everything seems t one working great. I am so happy it is back.
For some reason I'm still lusting for an original MM. Don't know why as I do like my CCD colors but I'd like to shoot the MM for a while for the experience of B&W only.
Was invited to a small venue to listen to some Icelandic music in the Northwest Icelandic town: Stykkishólmur
|
||
 |
||
|
Leica M-E, Leica Summilux-M 35mm ASPH. (f1.4, 1/45, ISO 640)
|
||
 |
||
|
Leica M-E, Leica Summilux-M 35mm ASPH. (f1.4, 1/750, ISO 160)
|
||
 |
||
|
Leica M-E, Leica Summilux-M 35mm ASPH. (f1.4, 1/2000, ISO 160)
May 31, 2016 at 03:52 PM
p.1323 #17Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
The original MM is just a terrific camera STILL. I prefer the files from my MM over all my other cameras especially when talking B&W. None of the artifacts you can get from conversion.
May 31, 2016 at 04:41 PM
p.1323 #18Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Simple Things. by Abram Goglanian, on FlickrSome people watching at the Broad Museum in LA.
M240 + 35mm Summicron ASPH
May 31, 2016 at 05:42 PM
p.1323 #19Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
canerino wrote:
How long did it take Alan? A friend of mine sent his in and is having a hard time getting a hold of anyone!
airfrogusmc wrote:
It was just short of 2 months and very little communication. I actually thought they were doing a complete sensor replace. I will get out tomorrow with it but all tests seem to be good. Sensor is clean and everything seems t one working great. I am so happy it is back.
That's been my experience too so on one hand I'm glad to know it wasn't just me, but on the other hand, Leica really needs to step up their communication. They've had my 28mm Summicron for over 4 months, and I've had to send it back twice (three trips total now) to get them to fix it right. And this isn't me being picky, this is them completely failing to do any sort of quality check on the work being done before it gets sent out. (IE: parts being loose when it arrives, or being mounted crooked).
I'm hoping to have it back this week, but it's been pretty frustrating to deal with Leica NJ.
How long did it take Alan? A friend of mine sent his in and is having a hard time getting a hold of anyone!
airfrogusmc wrote:
It was just short of 2 months and very little communication. I actually thought they were doing a complete sensor replace. I will get out tomorrow with it but all tests seem to be good. Sensor is clean and everything seems t one working great. I am so happy it is back.
That's been my experience too so on one hand I'm glad to know it wasn't just me, but on the other hand, Leica really needs to step up their communication. They've had my 28mm Summicron for over 4 months, and I've had to send it back twice (three trips total now) to get them to fix it right. And this isn't me being picky, this is them completely failing to do any sort of quality check on the work being done before it gets sent out. (IE: parts being loose when it arrives, or being mounted crooked).
I'm hoping to have it back this week, but it's been pretty frustrating to deal with Leica NJ.
May 31, 2016 at 05:45 PM
p.1323 #20Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
I had no idea it was on the way back. I didn't know what they had decided to do.
I has a CPS member for a very long time and Canon has a facility here in suburban Chicago. I would call, they would have loaners for me to pick up when I dropped of my cameras and lenses and even MAJOR repairs like a complete shutter replacement was done is a couple of days.
I know Leica is a much different beast but communication should be an easy thing and a no brainer.
I has a CPS member for a very long time and Canon has a facility here in suburban Chicago. I would call, they would have loaners for me to pick up when I dropped of my cameras and lenses and even MAJOR repairs like a complete shutter replacement was done is a couple of days.
I know Leica is a much different beast but communication should be an easy thing and a no brainer.
May 31, 2016 at 05:57 PM