Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
p.1285 #2Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Cross post from the People Photography forum. Since it was shot on an M w/ 28 Elmarit Asph
Mar 02, 2016 at 07:21 PM
p.1285 #3Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
A few dawn long(er) exposures. All M9/28 Cron.
Mar 02, 2016 at 11:57 PM
p.1285 #4Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
" R 18316 "
R18316R by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
Mar 03, 2016 at 02:57 AM
p.1285 #5Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
uhoh7 wrote:
I was invited to show the apple 5K and talk about Sony at a local photo club, so of course I had to take some snaps
I love that actual prints were shown and shared there!
I was invited to show the apple 5K and talk about Sony at a local photo club, so of course I had to take some snaps
I love that actual prints were shown and shared there!
Mar 03, 2016 at 09:25 AM
p.1285 #6Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
The ZM 85 flaring a bit:
M240 + ZM 85/2 by edward karaa, on Flickr
M240 + ZM 85/2 by edward karaa, on FlickrMar 03, 2016 at 09:55 AM
p.1285 #7Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
retrofocus wrote:
I love that actual prints were shown and shared there!
Yes, they have several members who only like to show that way. I was trying to get the point across that showing on big screen TVs which they often do, is a real travesty, but the 5K iMac is near the level of decent prints, though of course it is not the same and color gamut is reduced. For pure resolution only a really fantastic print can match it.
Sandra by unoh7, CV 35/1.4
uhoh7 wrote
I was invited to show the apple 5K and talk about Sony at a local photo club, so of course I had to take some snapsYes, they have several members who only like to show that way. I was trying to get the point across that showing on big screen TVs which they often do, is a real travesty, but the 5K iMac is near the level of decent prints, though of course it is not the same and color gamut is reduced. For pure resolution only a really fantastic print can match it.
Sandra by unoh7, CV 35/1.4
Mar 03, 2016 at 01:34 PM
p.1285 #8Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
ZM 35/1.4 on MP 240 around Hong Kong
Mar 04, 2016 at 10:40 AM
p.1285 #9Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Hurry......it's almost gone......
 |
||
 |
||
|
Mar 04, 2016 at 11:28 AM
p.1285 #10Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
SL meets ZM 35/1.4:
SL 601 + ZM 35/1.4 by edward karaa, on Flickr
SL 601 + ZM 35/1.4 by edward karaa, on Flickr
SL 601 + ZM 35/1.4 by edward karaa, on FlickrSL 601 + ZM 35/1.4 by edward karaa, on FlickrMar 04, 2016 at 12:18 PM
|
p.1285 #11Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
SL Edward? Have I completely missed this or is it breaking news? 
If so are you replacing the M 240 or wil you be using both?
If so are you replacing the M 240 or wil you be using both?
Mar 04, 2016 at 12:54 PM
p.1285 #12Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
joakim wrote:
SL Edward? Have I completely missed this or is it breaking news?
If so are you replacing the M 240 or wil you be using both?
Actually I just bought it this morning, body only to use with my ZM lenses. I plan to sell the M to be honest. It hasn't inspired me much recently, and now that I realized that I can nail the focus consistently with the huge viewfinder even without peaking (it's off) and magnification, with much better framing (of course), I am convinced it will be the right decision.
SL Edward? Have I completely missed this or is it breaking news?
If so are you replacing the M 240 or wil you be using both?
Actually I just bought it this morning, body only to use with my ZM lenses. I plan to sell the M to be honest. It hasn't inspired me much recently, and now that I realized that I can nail the focus consistently with the huge viewfinder even without peaking (it's off) and magnification, with much better framing (of course), I am convinced it will be the right decision.
Mar 04, 2016 at 01:03 PM
p.1285 #13Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Congratulations on the purchase then and I'll be looking forward to seeing your photos with the SL And also to hear more about your experience with the EVF vs the RF.
Mar 04, 2016 at 02:01 PM
p.1285 #14Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
)( by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
Mar 04, 2016 at 03:43 PM
p.1285 #16Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Thank you Joakim, merci Charlie! 
I will definitely post my thoughts on the SL as soon as I get more mileage with it. It's pretty complicated actually, quite the opposite from the M.
I will definitely post my thoughts on the SL as soon as I get more mileage with it. It's pretty complicated actually, quite the opposite from the M.
Mar 04, 2016 at 10:35 PM
p.1285 #17Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Edward, big congratulation! Look forward to see more images from you. How you compare the file quality to M240?
Mar 04, 2016 at 10:43 PM
p.1285 #18Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
zhangyue wrote:
Edward, big congratulation! Look forward to see more images from you. How you compare the file quality to M240?
Thank you Zhangyue! My first impression is that it is quite comparable. Maybe 1 stop or 2 better in high ISO. Color similar but slightly less saturated by default. I will definitely let you know when I have more experience with it.
Mar 04, 2016 at 10:47 PM
p.1285 #19Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Wow - great news Edward! Congrats! I hope you gel with it and it is as enjoyable as the M240 was for you. I haven't been using my M240 much lately - mainly due to being so busy. I took it out at lunch today for a short 20min walk around downtown. I only brought the 50lux to try something different. Looking at some of my pics, the 50lux really does have some special rendering - particularly wide open. A few snaps.
50lux ASPH
50lux ASPH
50lux ASPH
50lux ASPH
 |
||
 |
||
|
50lux ASPH
|
||
 |
||
|
50lux ASPH
|
||
 |
||
|
50lux ASPH
|
||
 |
||
|
50lux ASPH
Mar 04, 2016 at 10:48 PM
p.1285 #20Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Thank you Gary! Very nice rendering from the 50 lux! I am really liking the SL. My only complaint so far is the size. It doesn't fit in any of my M bags, so I need to go shopping for a new one soon The finish quality is superb, S level rather than M.
I am really liking the SL. My only complaint so far is the size. It doesn't fit in any of my M bags, so I need to go shopping for a new one soon The finish quality is superb, S level rather than M.Mar 04, 2016 at 11:45 PM