Rene, very nice from Alassio, we go there every year for two days in Oktober, it is just beautiful then...
I invite you to have a look on my album: https://www.flickr.com/gp/w-utsch/8Y8Q13]Alassio[/url]
Werner_Utsch wrote:
Rene, very nice from Alassio, we go there every year for two days in Oktober, it is just beautiful then...
I invite you to have a look on my album: https://www.flickr.com/gp/w-utsch/8Y8Q13]Alassio[/url]
Oh nice. We were in April . Unfortunately, only a 2 day on transit . stayed at Hotel Lamberti . hotel and food wonderful. thanks for the link. Great images Werner! oh just seen . you were probably at the Grand Hotel ! great views ! :-)
René
Could any of you kind folk share some insight into using something wider than 35mm with the m240? For example, 24/25? Or is 28 the very limit of usefulness with the VF? Is 25 add on VF only?
I am have a project which can involve tighter spaces, and I am debating the usefulness of something wider than 35mm.
I chuckle at the 28 angst which surrounds the Q, of course for shooting people on the street 35 hard too beat, but I would be lost without wider options, like my ZM18, SEM 21 and the 28 Cron, in the outdoors.
On the M9 the ZI viewfinders are fantastic, if a bit pricey
ricardovaste wrote:
Could any of you kind folk share some insight into using something wider than 35mm with the m240? For example, 24/25? Or is 28 the very limit of usefulness with the VF? Is 25 add on VF only?
I am have a project which can involve tighter spaces, and I am debating the usefulness of something wider than 35mm.
I just shoot and see what I get later.
If I need critical framing then I'll use the EVF. An optical viewfinder is ridiculous to consider as its a two step process.. Unless you're planning on zone focusing, then sure go optical VF.
ricardovaste wrote:
Could any of you kind folk share some insight into using something wider than 35mm with the m240? For example, 24/25? Or is 28 the very limit of usefulness with the VF? Is 25 add on VF only?
I am have a project which can involve tighter spaces, and I am debating the usefulness of something wider than 35mm.
I always use the zeiss 25 without external finder. I just frame tightly. If I use an external finder, regardless if it is an ovf or evf , I always focus with the rangefinder. The evf is slower to focus and less accurate.
Adam, Edward, thanks! I don't have the EVF and would like to not get one. I would be using 24/25 in order to include "more", so I zone focusing and medium-small aperture would be very feasible. Edward, do you find there is much excluded when using the Zeiss 25 with the rangefinder?
I think I'll simply begin with 35 and see how things go. I will hopefully not need anything wider, but useful to know how things could work.
Ohh, I get to have different opinions from both Adam and Edward at the same time I prefer to use an external VF with my 24 lenses and I prefer an optical VF since I find it much faster to use the two step process than the EVF.
I prefer to use an external VF with my 24 lenses and I prefer an optical VF since I find it much faster to use the two step process than the EVF.