fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Lighting & Studio Techniques | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3       4              6              26       27       end
  

Archive 2010 · PLM V2's announced!

  
 
Kacey
Offline
• •
[X]
p.5 #1 · PLM V2's announced!


Csae wrote:
The downside is that they are both doing it in the wrong place.

I totally agree but I did not make a unfounded claim about Mr Buffs products in this thread. If it's any consolation i'm sure there is a PLM V3 thread right around the corner.





Aug 24, 2010 at 03:11 AM
rrweather
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #2 · PLM V2's announced!


I will start off by saying I own products made by both PCB and Kacey Enterprises. I am also happy with the products I own from both companies. That said, I am surprised to see the exchange of words going on. I've always believed that if you make a good product or provide a good service, it will speak for itself. Both companies make products that, I believe speak, for themselves, which really makes this bickering even less necessary.

One thing I've never understood is when a company slams another company for a product when the company doing the slamming doesn't offer a competing product. Last I checked, Kacey Enterprises does not build lights. The Einstein could be the worst design out there but until Kacey Enterprises builds something better, it is pointless to hear Kacey slamming the light. It's kinda like Ford slamming the design of Honda motorcycles.

The Kacey bracket is a great design that few companies offer something to compete with (including PCB). Let the quality of the bracket, the beauty dish, and the new products speak for themselves. I'm a little surprised because the other posts I've seen from Kacey were professional and respectful while still promoting the products.

Whether or not PCB and Kacey Enterprises "rely on one another" is irrelevant. They are in the same industry and both companies should be interested in seeing the industry as a whole do well. The more people out taking pictures, the more likely it is those people eventually buy your products.

Why not "agree to disagree" and move on. Again, both companies make great products. Why not leave it at that?



Aug 24, 2010 at 03:15 AM
jwboring
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #3 · PLM V2's announced!


mods would lock this thread in other forums


Aug 24, 2010 at 07:18 AM
Seanzky
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #4 · PLM V2's announced!


jwboring wrote:
mods would lock this thread in other forums


I disagree. Just because the thread went off-topic, that doesn't mean a discussion has to be ceased.



Aug 24, 2010 at 07:47 AM
Robb Mann
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #5 · PLM V2's announced!


While these comments are indeed off of the original topic, this is a great discussion. My only gripe is that I never did get my PLM V1/V2 compatibility question answered, so I'll try again:

"Does the newly-introduced and not-at-all backordered Elinchrom v2 PLM "cage" work with the V1 PLM?". I already have a 65" silver PLM, and would love to save money and time by just getting the cage. I've built a dedicated umbrella adapter for my Quadra, but for $13 I could upgrade to something less ghetto.



Aug 24, 2010 at 07:56 AM
Seanzky
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #6 · PLM V2's announced!


rrweather wrote:
I will start off by saying I own products made by both PCB and Kacey Enterprises. I am also happy with the products I own from both companies. That said, I am surprised to see the exchange of words going on. I've always believed that if you make a good product or provide a good service, it will speak for itself. Both companies make products that, I believe speak, for themselves, which really makes this bickering even less necessary.

One thing I've never understood is when a company slams another company for a product when the company doing the slamming
...Show more

I agree that good products will speak for themselves. Though I have nothing against Paul, he's the one who has been known to defend his products here on these very boards when a member asks for comparisons with a competing product, for example. And if products and service do speak for themselves, then PCB wouldn't even be here, right? Or at least PCB shouldn't be here defending his products, right? (Mind you, in both polls Paul started whether he should be here or not, I voted that it's okay for him to be here as long as the forum isn't used for the wrong reasons --advertising, promoting, etc.)

I, too, use PCB and Kacey products but I can't fault Jerry Kacey for standing his ground. And just because Jerry doesn't manufacture a competing strobe, that doesn't mean his points on design flaws by PCB is baseless. In fact he has quoted Paul claims about the Einstein having better air flow than AB/WL only to find out it overheats, which neither the AB/WL ever did. Does that mean he still has to make a product that's superior to the Einsteins just because he doesn't like them? What if he already owns ABs that don't overheat or maybe Elinchrom and he's completely happy with them design-wise? Just like in your example, if Ford lambasts Honda motorcycles that doesn't automatically mean Ford feels the need to create their own motorcycles. What if the Ford president just finds Honda motorcycles' design inferior to Ducati based on his experience, for example?

I don't think Jerry was here to promote his product. Correct me if I'm wrong but PCB spoke out first after Dave (Tetrode) posted his Einsteins mounting a Rotalux modifier. Jerry merely pointed out that the "tunnel" his mount creates isn't as bad as the tunnel in PCB's mount. The discussion regarding design flaws only strayed after the back and forth about each others' design to prove a point. I could be wrong, but this is how I understood things.

On the other board, Jerry remains professional even when provoked. I was one of the people on POTN who said negative things about the tunneling his adapter creates and questioned whether there would be a significant hotspot created but he maintained his cool and stated that in actual use and base on the tests, it really doesn't mean much. But I guess something PCB must have said made Jerry lose his cool? I don't know the history between the two, so I can't really say.

But in the end, Jerry nor Paul has never once told anyone to stop buying each others' products. I don't see why this thread is so wrong. Maybe because it should have its own thread and have this one steer back to PLM v2, which I've always been interested in.



Aug 24, 2010 at 08:11 AM
Seanzky
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #7 · PLM V2's announced!


Robb Mann wrote:
While these comments are indeed off of the original topic, this is a great discussion. My only gripe is that I never did get my PLM V1/V2 compatibility question answered, so I'll try again:

"Does the newly-introduced and not-at-all backordered Elinchrom v2 PLM "cage" work with the V1 PLM?". I already have a 65" silver PLM, and would love to save money and time by just getting the cage. I've built a dedicated umbrella adapter for my Quadra, but for $13 I could upgrade to something less ghetto.


Good question! I also want to know if the Elinchrom PLMs are as backordered as the AB/WL/E640 ones. If not, I will jump on the pre-order list but if they are, I'll just wait it out.



Aug 24, 2010 at 08:13 AM
kenyee
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #8 · PLM V2's announced!


tetrode wrote:
I'll wait, thanks. I suspect that even PCB's generous service policy is not about to cover shorting the flashtube pins with aluminum foil


...good point. Forgot about that small detail


Seanzky wrote:
I disagree. Just because the thread went off-topic, that doesn't mean a discussion has to be ceased.


It's not about the content...it's about the general tone and near ad-hominem attacks. I've mod'd forums/mailing lists. I would have deleted posts by now and given warnings, and I hate doing that because I expect people to behave better...



Aug 24, 2010 at 08:54 AM
Seanzky
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #9 · PLM V2's announced!


kenyee wrote:
...good point. Forgot about that small detail


It's not about the content...it's about the general tone and near ad-hominem attacks. I've mod'd forums/mailing lists. I would have deleted posts by now and given warnings, and I hate doing that because I expect people to behave better...


Lol. I'm used to PCB calling other people names here (though I've never seen Verner do so before) that it was like nothing to me. I mean, even Jerry didn't react to it. It's not like it ended up in a "Yo momma so fat..." back and forth. Lol. Besides, if you look at the personal attacks, it's not too bad.



Aug 24, 2010 at 09:27 AM
rrweather
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #10 · PLM V2's announced!


I don't own a company so maybe I would react differently if I did. That said, there is a way to handle yourself with with dignity and while being a professional. That isn't exactly taking place here. As at least one other person mentioned, the back-and-forth antics look bad in a customer's eyes. As I said, why not let the quality of your products do the speaking for you.

I am by no means a PCB Super Fan. The one thing I do respect is the fact that he is even on the boards providing some support. Call the support what you want, any time a manufacturer actually provides customer service, it is good for us consumers. Unfortunately, when you are in the forums, it is easy to become a target. Notice how many manufacturers are nowhere to be found in the forums. Often the guy that shows up and posts gets more heat than the guy that is not here posting.

In that sense, I like the fact that Jerry is here, providing service to people using or considering his products. In fact, that is how I stumbled upon his site and his products. He provided great customer service when I placed my order, which was nice to see at a time when most companies outsource customer service to Pakistan.

As I said, maybe I would react differently if I made a product that was being challenged by someone else.



Aug 24, 2010 at 10:15 AM
Sean Baker
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #11 · PLM V2's announced!


I'm just happy to see Paul responding to market demand and can't wait to get a v2 (or a few of them) when they ship.


Aug 24, 2010 at 10:50 AM
Seanzky
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #12 · PLM V2's announced!


rrweather wrote:
I don't own a company so maybe I would react differently if I did. That said, there is a way to handle yourself with with dignity and while being a professional. That isn't exactly taking place here. As at least one other person mentioned, the back-and-forth antics look bad in a customer's eyes. As I said, why not let the quality of your products do the speaking for you.

I am by no means a PCB Super Fan. The one thing I do respect is the fact that he is even on the boards providing some support. Call the support what
...Show more

And you're completely right. We're both on the same boat in terms of our status as consumers on forums and the fact we like that individuals representing their respective products which we buy are here. It's a very tricky situation though because, while we want their products to speak for themselves instead of firing at each other publicly, I want to hear their opinion from a consumer point of view of each others' products, too. As long as it's not baseless and senseless bashing, I think it's fine. It would be a very different case if they just bad-mouth each other for no reason.



Aug 24, 2010 at 10:55 AM
E-Vener
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #13 · PLM V2's announced!


The funny thing is a kindergartener could see that placing huge vents directly behind the flash tube and modeling light is going to channel all that heat directly into the "highly evolved airflow design."

Your designated kindergartener would also notice two very basic things upon looking at an Einstein v1 and having one of his parents plug it in and turn it on for them

The first thing they'd notice is that the vents in the front plate are neither , in your misleading verbiage, "huge" or "light sucking ". The second thing they'd notice after the unit was turned on is that the airflow is positive from the body of the Einstein out past the modeling light and flash tube assembly (another portion of the airflow exhausts fro the top of the unit)

These two mischaracterizations on your part , along with your prior statement that I must have "(taken) the back plate off the housing" and by "housing" I assume you meant the body of the flash, leads me to believe that you haven't ever actually handled an Einstein.

If you want argue that have a forward mounted flash tube makes for more even light in a softbox than by that logic the Speedotron Blackline, Profoto, Broncolor, the Dynalite 4040 head, Balcar's, and Broncolor's head designs are clearly superior to Elinchrom's design.

So yes I do agree with you that "People can form their own conclusions about who is talking "gibberish"".

BTW: I'm pretty sure Paul Buff was wrong when he said that Photoflex came up with the softbox Speedring + adapter + sub reflector (as needed by individual head designs) insert. I'm about 99% sure that is a Chimera innovation from the days when Gary Regester was a partner there ( late 1970s through early 1980s ) as well as cofounder and softbox designer before leaving to create the Plume Wafer softboxes at Plume ltd. http://www.plumeltd.com







Aug 24, 2010 at 11:58 AM
Kacey
Offline
• •
[X]
p.5 #14 · PLM V2's announced!


The first thing they'd notice is that the vents in the front plate are neither , in your misleading verbiage, "huge" or "light sucking ". The second thing they'd notice after the unit was turned on is that the airflow is positive from the body of the Einstein out past the modeling light and flash tube assembly (another portion of the airflow exhausts fro the top of the unit)

Other Pro's might disagree with you....

The issue is heat rises..... remember that's the part of the class where you get to play with the cool balloons? All the heat in going through these large vent holes when the flash is angle down. If you have a theory of why the flash is overheating I would love to hear it. Maybe you can help Paul too with some ways to take care of the overheating lights he is sending everyone, so they and start using them a a hair light. At some point the line to send them back for the new face plate is going to be longer than pre-order/back-order line.... Don't you think

These two mischaracterizations on your part , along with your prior statement that I must have "(taken) the back plate off the housing" and by "housing" I assume you meant the body of the flash, leads me to believe that you haven't ever actually handled an Einstein.

Your right, I don't have a Einstein but I would assume taking the front plate off the flash and placing a light source in front would be the only way to accurately test and review the amount of light passing through it. Would you mind posting a picture of the side panel of the flash removed? I would like everyone one following this to have a look on the other side of the panel. Then we can see if they think it's at all possible to get a light reading of the amount of light passing through the vent holes in the way you described. I don't know one way or the other..... maybe if you don't post a picture somebody else will.

If you want argue that have a forward mounted flash tube makes for more even light in a softbox than by that logic the Speedotron Blackline, Profoto, Broncolor, the Dynalite 4040 head, Balcar's, and Broncolor's head designs are clearly superior to Elinchrom's design.

Not really sure because I have not tested all these other lines. All I can comment is that Elincrom is better IMO than anything PCB offers and it's because the flash tube sits further inside the modifier than anything Paul offers. It would be funny if in the next few years we see a redesigned lower profile insert/speedring.
I have worked with Profoto and I can say that it's the best mount that I've currently worked with. Being able to adjust the placement in their design is awesome.


So yes I do agree with you that "People can form their own conclusions about who is talking "gibberish"".

I'm good with that... You are still dodging my legitimate question on if you agree with paul that every softbox type modifier would need to be re-designed because of the flash tube being moved completely inside the modifier to give 100 percent bounce on every surface of the modifier?

It's easy at this point to see you wrote a review for a major magazine that missed every design flaw that has come to light after they have been in the publics hand for a short time. Maybe it's warranted for you do some more testing and confirm issues the inventor even acknowledges. Then write a followup review for Professional Photographer Magazine since thousands and thousands need to send them back for a replacement for them to work as advertised.

BTW: I'm pretty sure Paul Buff was wrong when he said that Photoflex came up with the softbox Speedring + adapter + sub reflector (as needed by individual head designs) insert. I'm about 99% sure that is a Chimera innovation from the days when Gary Regester was a partner there ( late 1970s through early 1980s ) as well as cofounder and softbox designer before leaving to create the Plume Wafer softboxes at Plume ltd. [url]http://www.plumeltd.com[/url]

Not really sure about all that. I will leave you and Paul to sort this out. I just thought Balcar invented Paul's mount and he corrected me and said Photoflex did it.

Edited on Aug 26, 2010 at 08:18 PM · View previous versions



Aug 24, 2010 at 01:20 PM
Paul Buff
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #15 · PLM V2's announced!


This will be my last post on this distorted thread.

Kacey, I honestly feel sorry for you. If you think the cooling slots in the Einstein are some sort of engineering screw up you ought to look behind the dome of a Profoto Compact . . . you know - that amateurish company that doesn't have the vast engineering knowledge you do. The light loss of Einstein slots, and Profoto's similar behind-the-tube cooling holes is calculated in square inches VS total area and allows about 1/20f to not be directed to the modifier.

The reason for excess heating in Einstein V1 stems from too much airflow being directed to the lamps and insufficient thermal isolation of the reflector plate from the housing itself. I did intensive, successful work over the past two months to correct this issue in V2 and the parts have been carefully tested and are in route. If you think you had anything to do with the Einstein V2 front end design I must re state the elephant and flea story and might suggest that you reassess your importance in this industry as well as your engineering skills.

As for reflector angles and measurements, one can measure and state about any result that best serves their purpose. In regard to this subject, I would first say the only viable comparison is to actually shoot pictures against a flat surface (in the absence of a two dimensional arc) and look at the hot and cold spots and the actual field covered.

On this subject, one must remember (or learn) the physics of measuring angle of coverage. When one illuminates a flat surface with a wide angle reflector (such as our standard 7" reflector) the actual angle of coverage must be determined by measuring all points in an arc (say 10' radius) from the source.

If one measures the points on a large flat surface the perceived angle of coverage will be less than the actual angle of coverage. Why? Because the outer perimeter (plus and minus 50° points) of the wall-pattern projected by a properly defined 100° reflector is 13.56 feet from the light source, while the center of the pattern is 10' from the source. In this example, because of inverse square law propagation of light, the intensity at 100° will appear to be 1f lower than if the 100° and 0° points were both measured properly at the same distance from the source.

So go ahead and sell your adapters and add on stuff and we'll sell our products. We don't mind a few fleas . . . they're just minor irritants. But I believe you have lost a bunch of Buff customers by your overzealous opinion of yourself.



Aug 24, 2010 at 01:32 PM
Kacey
Offline
• •
[X]
p.5 #16 · PLM V2's announced!


Paul Buff wrote:
Kacey, I honestly feel sorry for you. If you think the cooling slots in the Einstein are some sort of engineering screw up you ought to look behind the dome of a Profoto Compact . . . you know - that amateurish company that doesn't have the vast engineering knowledge you do. The light loss of Einstein slots, and Profoto's similar behind-the-tube cooling holes is calculated in square inches VS total area and allows about 1/20f to not be directed to the modifier.


Don't feel sorry for me,
Now you opened the door to have your current product with the vent holes to be compared to Profoto ? Then you follow by saying their amateurish?
Don't take the suggestion and leave the vent holes. There are other people that will disagree with you.
Unpacking

Packing

Paul Buff wrote:
The reason for excess heating in Einstein V1 stems from too much airflow being directed to the lamps and insufficient thermal isolation of the reflector plate from the housing itself. I did intensive, successful work over the past two months to correct this issue in V2 and the parts have been carefully tested and are in route. If you think you had anything to do with the Einstein V2 front end design I must re state the elephant and flea story and might suggest that you reassess your importance in this industry as well as your engineering skills.


We have heard it all before...
Paul Buff wrote:
Cooling volume is about four times that of AB/WL. Yes, it's full of parts and is purposely very compact. The airflow design is highly evolved and has a very effective path through all components. Multiple heat sensors protect everything from overheat damage.


I dont think anyone is buying all your claims anymore....... Leave the vent holes there then if they are not the issue..
I have not opened a Einstein to see the whole picture of why they are failing. If you can do it and leave those vent whole... More power to you.
Does back bone of the Einstein's state of the art cooling system consist of the same 40mm cooling fan the ABR has in it?
http://k1.smugmug.com/photos/452845857_hBwgF-M.jpg


You never answered the question about the recall list being larger than the back order list, Paul..... Your dodging the question..... Now your going going to post anymore? Your still shipping flashes with vent holes, Right?

But I believe you have lost a bunch of Buff customers by your overzealous opinion of yourself. Funny we have sold more in the last two days than ever before.

My next project is to manufacture a all metal bracket for the AB Ring Flash
I need one that actually works and I'm sure your customers do to. Want me to send you one for yours

Edited on Aug 26, 2010 at 04:45 PM · View previous versions



Aug 24, 2010 at 01:46 PM
Mardel
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #17 · PLM V2's announced!


Jeebus! I'm really trying to figure out which Flame Warrior you are Kacey.

-Back on topic. Will the PLM V2 diffusion fabric fit the 86" PLM V1?



Aug 24, 2010 at 02:31 PM
E-Vener
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #18 · PLM V2's announced!


It's easy at this point to see you wrote a review for a major magazine that missed every design flaw that has come to light after they have been in the publics hand for a short time.

If you haven't read the review how could you possibly know that? And by the way you are wrong.



Aug 24, 2010 at 02:47 PM
kenyee
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #19 · PLM V2's announced!


Mardel wrote:
-Back on topic. Will the PLM V2 diffusion fabric fit the 86" PLM V1?


IIRC, someone asked this in the AB techforum and the answer was yes...



Aug 24, 2010 at 03:02 PM
Kacey
Offline
• •
[X]
p.5 #20 · PLM V2's announced!


Honestly, I did not read your review because I do not support a magazine that hands out Hot One One Awards to Mr Buff without even evaluating a working product. Even through their printed policy clearly says they do. Link

"All 18 of our Hot One judges are independent professional photographers, who were selected for their expertise and knowledge. None is an employee of Professional Photographer. As always, we asked the judges to make their selections based on the products' overall quality, innovation, design, performance, and value for the price"

Instead Paul saying he does not send a working invention at all and they base the Award on his 27 year track record of the company for quality, innovation, design, performance value and customer satisfaction.

I skimmed through a long thread here in this forum were you address what I assume is some of your extensive testing for the writeup.

Here is one of your post about using PW with the Einstein. Now, given that it is a known issue that everyone is having major problems and this will be yet another issue everyone will have to send the product to get fixed. One just has to ask why you didn't test the radio triggering functionality as well?

E-Vener wrote:
Been doing some testing here , I set a Pocketwizard MultiMAX intervalometer to fire trigger my Einstein 1800 times, once every 5 seconds. Except for the occasional thermal overload prevention kicking in , no problems. When the thermal overload circuit is triggered there's about a thirty second break between flashes.


I could be wrong... Could you please let me in on the issues that you brought up in the review that are being addressed in the Einstein V2? After all I'm sure many purchased from PCB based on your review and what you post here.



Aug 24, 2010 at 03:25 PM
1       2       3       4              6              26       27       end




FM Forums | Lighting & Studio Techniques | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3       4              6              26       27       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account