Zeg, kunnen we overschakelen naar Engels, anders ga ik de hele tijd in het Nederlands typen.
So skip the Scandinavian talking, but post some more pictures of the beautiful landscapes (I've been to northern parts of Finland and Norway 2 years ago and enjoyed it very much).
Like these, but than with some magical Zeiss lenses (not with a Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 like mine):
U.C. wrote:
Zeg, kunnen we overschakelen naar Engels, anders ga ik de hele tijd in het Nederlands typen.
Inga problem, vi kan läsa nederländska!
Imponerande att vi till och med tvingat de stackars jänkarna att prata svenska. Misstänker dock att google har varit inblandat i vissa fall här
I guess Swedish cultural imperialism has been more successful than I thought
Anyway, great shots Charles!
Joakim, schysst bokeh..um I mean: cool bokeh! That's with the 28? You can get some really extreme stuff out of the 21 - something like late van Gogh on LSD:
That funky harsh bokeh of the ZE 28 is my biggest issue with that lens, as I prefer the bokeh of the 35/2 much better.The bokeh of the 21 in Denoir's shots looks less harsh than the 28.
I know bokeh, is a highly subjective topic.
