This topic is in the 2009 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 2009Canon 7D
p.61 #1Canon 7D
dwweiche wrote:
Granted I may have missed it in this 49 (!) page thread, but is there any mention in the 7D rumored specs that it includes micro-focus adjust? I don't seem to recall hearing that yet...
I do not remember seeing it mentioned here or on other sites.
Granted I may have missed it in this 49 (!) page thread, but is there any mention in the 7D rumored specs that it includes micro-focus adjust? I don't seem to recall hearing that yet...
I do not remember seeing it mentioned here or on other sites.
Aug 30, 2009 at 04:35 PM
p.61 #2Canon 7D
the rumored specs of the rumored 7D looks good to me, the cameras keeps getting better and better, i have owned 300D, 10D, 20D, and 40D, i am ready for a new upgrade.
i dont understand all the negativity, you have to remember that canon inc is a business, if they made the ultimate camera that everyone wants today, what will they come up with tomorrow?
incremental improvements so you keep coming back for more.
i dont understand all the negativity, you have to remember that canon inc is a business, if they made the ultimate camera that everyone wants today, what will they come up with tomorrow?
incremental improvements so you keep coming back for more.
Aug 30, 2009 at 04:51 PM
p.61 #3Canon 7D
Pierre Leclerc wrote:
i dont understand all the negativity, you have to remember that canon inc is a business
I'm with you Pierre. I would even venture to say that if most of the complainers were running Canon, Minolta would have bought them out a couple years ago.
i dont understand all the negativity, you have to remember that canon inc is a business
I'm with you Pierre. I would even venture to say that if most of the complainers were running Canon, Minolta would have bought them out a couple years ago.
Aug 30, 2009 at 04:59 PM
p.61 #4Canon 7D
charlesk wrote:
I just want a *proper* update to the 5D -- a camera with lots of pixels, good image quality, decent AF and a reasonable price. --c
That's precisely what the 5DII is.
I just want a *proper* update to the 5D -- a camera with lots of pixels, good image quality, decent AF and a reasonable price. --c
That's precisely what the 5DII is.
Aug 30, 2009 at 05:01 PM
p.61 #5Canon 7D
p.48 #18 ยท Canon 7D
twilighter wrote:
Venus wrote:
hiii ... that's why they don't need to make any announcements in china. from china, everything is leaked to the world!
Leak of information can be a business tactic.
I think you are right on this. They probably planned this, so that when D300s hit the shelf, we get the leak from Canon 7D. Fewer people switch to Nikon.
business is war without bloodshed, like politics.
jap business strategists are schooled in Sun Tze's art of war.
http://www.artofwarsuntzu.com/america_experiences_sun_tzu.htm
in times of bloodless war (as in fierce business competition), it's important not to trust everything you read and see. what you have been led to percieve could be a deception. on the other hand, it may not be. truth, half-truths and untruth are lumped together to create confusion.
but intelligence gathering is important.
yes, it's all very complex and can be extremely stressful but thank goodness it's peaceful!!
twilighter wrote:
Venus wrote:
hiii ... that's why they don't need to make any announcements in china. from china, everything is leaked to the world!
Leak of information can be a business tactic.
I think you are right on this. They probably planned this, so that when D300s hit the shelf, we get the leak from Canon 7D. Fewer people switch to Nikon.
business is war without bloodshed, like politics.
jap business strategists are schooled in Sun Tze's art of war.
http://www.artofwarsuntzu.com/america_experiences_sun_tzu.htm
in times of bloodless war (as in fierce business competition), it's important not to trust everything you read and see. what you have been led to percieve could be a deception. on the other hand, it may not be. truth, half-truths and untruth are lumped together to create confusion.
but intelligence gathering is important.
yes, it's all very complex and can be extremely stressful but thank goodness it's peaceful!!Aug 30, 2009 at 05:03 PM
p.61 #7Canon 7D
Will Patterson wrote:
Wow, almost 50 pages? Guys, give it a rest.
NEVER!
Wow, almost 50 pages? Guys, give it a rest.
NEVER!
Aug 30, 2009 at 05:30 PM
p.61 #8Canon 7D
Are there going to be many disappointed people if there's no annoucement tomorrow? (Just thought I had to write something on this thread. Didn't want to eb the only person not to...)
Aug 30, 2009 at 05:32 PM
p.61 #9Canon 7D
Supposed ISO 6400 shot from the 7D....
http://www.canonrumorsforum.com/index.php?topic=164.0
http://www.canonrumorsforum.com/index.php?topic=164.0
Aug 30, 2009 at 05:59 PM
p.61 #10Canon 7D
Randy Smith wrote:
Unless they were eliminating 1.3?
Why would they do that?
globalkiwi wrote
I can't see Canon placing a third crop factor camera between the 1.6 & the 1.3.Why would they do that?
Aug 30, 2009 at 05:59 PM
p.61 #11Canon 7D
32067dlm wrote:
That's precisely what the 5DII is.
Yawn.
I want something actually worth blowing a bunch of extra money on. The 5D2 ain't it, at least for me. --c
charlesk wrote
I just want a *proper* update to the 5D -- a camera with lots of pixels, good image quality, decent AF and a reasonable price. --cYawn.
I want something actually worth blowing a bunch of extra money on. The 5D2 ain't it, at least for me. --c
Aug 30, 2009 at 06:56 PM
p.61 #12Canon 7D
So the Box pic of the 7D shows a non usm lens in a "IS USM' box kit.
Fake. Also, the pic of the 7D with the new ef-s lenses. Most of the back of that camera looks more like a nikon.
Dave
Fake. Also, the pic of the 7D with the new ef-s lenses. Most of the back of that camera looks more like a nikon.
Dave
Aug 30, 2009 at 07:06 PM
p.61 #13Canon 7D
wonders how people took pictures in the old days before Autofocus,in camera metering,IS,...? Its seem everyone wants the camera to do everything now for them,doesnt this take the beauty out of Photography.Not saying these are not useful items I personally couldnt live without A/F due to bad eyes but Cmon
the metering/AF/IS works as it should or to the best that Canon could make it
for a mass produced item to ne enjoyed by all..sure Canon could take a luxuary
route like a Rolls royce and make the 10th the amount of cameras but they would
cost 10x they do now...then you all would complain about a 20k body...
the metering/AF/IS works as it should or to the best that Canon could make it
for a mass produced item to ne enjoyed by all..sure Canon could take a luxuary
route like a Rolls royce and make the 10th the amount of cameras but they would
cost 10x they do now...then you all would complain about a 20k body...
Aug 30, 2009 at 07:07 PM
p.61 #14Canon 7D
michael49 wrote:
Supposed ISO 6400 shot from the 7D....
http://www.canonrumorsforum.com/index.php?topic=164.0
Hoax, guy on POTN made it just to show how stuff gets taken from one forum and becomes "truth" on another, theres one board in another language that has it as "photo leaked from high source at Canon"
Heres a link to the page where its discussed a little: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=744517&page=12
Supposed ISO 6400 shot from the 7D....
http://www.canonrumorsforum.com/index.php?topic=164.0
Hoax, guy on POTN made it just to show how stuff gets taken from one forum and becomes "truth" on another, theres one board in another language that has it as "photo leaked from high source at Canon"
Heres a link to the page where its discussed a little: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=744517&page=12
Aug 30, 2009 at 07:10 PM
p.61 #15Canon 7D
Randy Smith wrote:
http://www.canonrumorsforum.com/index.php?topic=164.0Hoax, guy on POTN made it just to show how stuff gets taken from one forum and becomes "truth" on another, theres one board in another language that has it as "photo leaked from high source at Canon"
Heres a link to the page where its discussed a little: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=744517&page=12
Amazing, even the exif has was faked!!
michael49 wrote
Supposed ISO 6400 shot from the 7D....http://www.canonrumorsforum.com/index.php?topic=164.0
Heres a link to the page where its discussed a little: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=744517&page=12
Amazing, even the exif has was faked!!
Aug 30, 2009 at 07:35 PM
p.61 #16Canon 7D
Chris Beaumont wrote:
1D Mks I II and IIn and 1Ds Mks I & II had 45 selectable AF points, but not many cross types (don't know the exact number, sorry)
1D Mk III and 1Ds Mk III had the brand new (and now infamous) system with 'only' 19 selectable points, all x-type
Thanks for the clarification. Honestly, since I only use center, focus recompose, unless I had heard how many focus points my cameras had so many times (from people saying about the ancient 9pt system), I wouldn't know how many even my own had.
See for you guys, it's the dinosaur age 9 pt system...for me it's the 1 pt system :P I'm really looking forward to these new offerings. At the very least, I may be able to sneak into a 1dmk2N or 1dmk3 when all of this comes out.
RobertLynn wrote
Ah, so I was counting the assist points in. I thought it was 45 or something. Thank you for clarifying for me.1D Mk III and 1Ds Mk III had the brand new (and now infamous) system with 'only' 19 selectable points, all x-type
Thanks for the clarification. Honestly, since I only use center, focus recompose, unless I had heard how many focus points my cameras had so many times (from people saying about the ancient 9pt system), I wouldn't know how many even my own had.
See for you guys, it's the dinosaur age 9 pt system...for me it's the 1 pt system :P I'm really looking forward to these new offerings. At the very least, I may be able to sneak into a 1dmk2N or 1dmk3 when all of this comes out.
Aug 30, 2009 at 07:43 PM
p.61 #17Canon 7D
People, you need to get a grip. This has got to be the most out of control rumor thread here ever.
Aug 30, 2009 at 07:45 PM
p.61 #18Canon 7D
digitalbug30d wrote:
wonders how people took pictures in the old days before Autofocus,in camera metering,IS,...? Its seem everyone wants the camera to do everything now for them,doesnt this take the beauty out of Photography.Not saying these are not useful items I personally couldnt live without A/F due to bad eyes but Cmon
the metering/AF/IS works as it should or to the best that Canon could make it
for a mass produced item to ne enjoyed by all..sure Canon could take a luxuary
route like a Rolls royce and make the 10th the amount of cameras but they would
cost 10x they do now...then you...Show more →
This is wrong on so many levels, it's ridiculous. Technology marches on, the base level for cameras steps up. Once another company shows that it's possible to produce a full frame camera, with serious autofocus, and a range of other useful features for photographers, for less than $2500 (that's the Nikon D700, by the way) then Canon has to compete in the same ballpark. Giving us one good AF point (in the center) and 8 very-iffy AF points in a poor spread is no longer good enough, not for the money they are charging. Nikon offers a serious low-light machine, which also happens to do the business for sports, portraits, landscape and event photography, for less than the price of a 5D2. Canon would sell a ton of that sort of camera.
Yeah, in the old days it was a rare skill to be able to follow focus with a long telephoto. Nowadays, it's expected. If the photog next to you has a camera that can do this, and you do not, then you are no longer competitive. Doesn't matter what was way back when. This is now.
My 40D has better autofocus on the outer points than my 5D2, which costs 2.5 times as much. That's just not right. Yeah, yeah, the 5D2 has 21 megapixels, which is a whole lot more than most of us really need. I would bet that many 5D2 owners would have preferred a 16 megapixel camera with great autofocus over what Canon came up with. Am I alone in saying that if all my Canon lenses mounted on a D700 that I'd own at least two of 'em?
It's the cost of switching systems when one owns a lot of lenses that allows Canon to get away with the stuff it does on the xxD, xD, and 1D series lines.
wonders how people took pictures in the old days before Autofocus,in camera metering,IS,...? Its seem everyone wants the camera to do everything now for them,doesnt this take the beauty out of Photography.Not saying these are not useful items I personally couldnt live without A/F due to bad eyes but Cmon
the metering/AF/IS works as it should or to the best that Canon could make it
for a mass produced item to ne enjoyed by all..sure Canon could take a luxuary
route like a Rolls royce and make the 10th the amount of cameras but they would
cost 10x they do now...then you...Show more →
This is wrong on so many levels, it's ridiculous. Technology marches on, the base level for cameras steps up. Once another company shows that it's possible to produce a full frame camera, with serious autofocus, and a range of other useful features for photographers, for less than $2500 (that's the Nikon D700, by the way) then Canon has to compete in the same ballpark. Giving us one good AF point (in the center) and 8 very-iffy AF points in a poor spread is no longer good enough, not for the money they are charging. Nikon offers a serious low-light machine, which also happens to do the business for sports, portraits, landscape and event photography, for less than the price of a 5D2. Canon would sell a ton of that sort of camera.
Yeah, in the old days it was a rare skill to be able to follow focus with a long telephoto. Nowadays, it's expected. If the photog next to you has a camera that can do this, and you do not, then you are no longer competitive. Doesn't matter what was way back when. This is now.
My 40D has better autofocus on the outer points than my 5D2, which costs 2.5 times as much. That's just not right. Yeah, yeah, the 5D2 has 21 megapixels, which is a whole lot more than most of us really need. I would bet that many 5D2 owners would have preferred a 16 megapixel camera with great autofocus over what Canon came up with. Am I alone in saying that if all my Canon lenses mounted on a D700 that I'd own at least two of 'em?
It's the cost of switching systems when one owns a lot of lenses that allows Canon to get away with the stuff it does on the xxD, xD, and 1D series lines.
Aug 30, 2009 at 07:48 PM
p.61 #19Canon 7D
Hrow wrote:
People, you need to get a grip. This has got to be the most out of control rumor thread here ever.
Why? There is nothing wrong with harmless rumour and supposition.
Yes some people will be disappointed come Tuesday but that was always going to happen anyway. Join in and build your dream 1DMkIV since everyone else is.
People, you need to get a grip. This has got to be the most out of control rumor thread here ever.
Why? There is nothing wrong with harmless rumour and supposition.
Yes some people will be disappointed come Tuesday but that was always going to happen anyway. Join in and build your dream 1DMkIV since everyone else is.
Aug 30, 2009 at 07:58 PM
p.61 #20Canon 7D
LCollector wrote:
Randy, a lot of people will have a heart attack if this isn't released tomorrow...
I have been waiting to see what got released to make my decision on a new camera. A 1.6 crop camera hadnt entered my mind, it was MK2N, MK3, MK4, D2MK2, or a 5D2. All have plusses and minuses.
Then this 7D rumor came along, I am hoping it was cover for the MK4, but if it is real I might consider it at 1.6 (or 1.45, the new rumor) after some people try it out. If its 1.3 Ill get one.
As for lurking on the 7D threads, Im a golfer with a bad hand, I got LOTS of time to kill as I prepare to get back into photography.
Randy, a lot of people will have a heart attack if this isn't released tomorrow...
I have been waiting to see what got released to make my decision on a new camera. A 1.6 crop camera hadnt entered my mind, it was MK2N, MK3, MK4, D2MK2, or a 5D2. All have plusses and minuses.
Then this 7D rumor came along, I am hoping it was cover for the MK4, but if it is real I might consider it at 1.6 (or 1.45, the new rumor) after some people try it out. If its 1.3 Ill get one.
As for lurking on the 7D threads, Im a golfer with a bad hand, I got LOTS of time to kill as I prepare to get back into photography.
Aug 30, 2009 at 08:01 PM