fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              69              71              103       104       end
  

Archive 2009 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!

  
 
PetKal
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #1 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


noelle wrote:
Peter...I love the composition in #2


Thank you, Noelle, shots like that are not always premeditated.



May 22, 2009 at 09:19 AM
pingflood
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.70 #2 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Hey everyone, I am back from a hiatus so have some pages to catch up on!

Ran into some terns again today though. This time with the 20D.

http://beyondthematrix.com/IMG_8385.jpg

These guys were doing final take-off check:

http://beyondthematrix.com/IMG_8374.jpg

And... they're off!

http://beyondthematrix.com/IMG_8375.jpg

ALL of them....

http://beyondthematrix.com/IMG_8352.jpg

This guy clearly was making some commentary on me being there bothering them with my camera...

http://beyondthematrix.com/IMG_8377.jpg

All that aside, I could really use some post processing help. Let me know if anybody has time and I will upload a raw file and see what can be done -- I am really not very good at it!

edit:ok, one more!

http://beyondthematrix.com/IMG_8346.jpg



May 22, 2009 at 04:09 PM
PetKal
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #3 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Bird Sighting Alert. The fabled Wing Tong Egret seen in a Southern Ontario marsh.


Edited on Nov 16, 2009 at 09:18 PM · View previous versions



May 22, 2009 at 06:12 PM
PetKal
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #4 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Pingflood, are those Royal Terns ?
The last one you've got really good...almost a head on shot. However, they are all overexposed. Check your camera settings, look for a clipping flash on the cam lcd after you've taken the shot, then if need be, back off exposure in 1/3 EV steps until the display flashing stops.



May 22, 2009 at 06:20 PM
pingflood
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.70 #5 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


PetKal: I did check for blinkies and saw none. Shot in RAW, so might've gotten a little over enthusiastic with the adjustments in Lightroom. If you want to take a look at any of the files I'd be happy to upload the originals. I suck at post processing so any advice would be appreciated.

Here's the last one taken down a bit.. but it looks a little flat

http://beyondthematrix.com/IMG_8346-2.jpg



May 22, 2009 at 06:54 PM
PetKal
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #6 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


That looks very nice and dynamic, Pingflood.
A bit of a "kinetic" crop and a mild zing and she flies.

Edited on Nov 16, 2009 at 09:17 PM · View previous versions



May 22, 2009 at 07:15 PM
pingflood
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.70 #7 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


You lost me there.. What's the "zing"? Looks great -- thanks!


May 22, 2009 at 07:16 PM
PetKal
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #8 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


pingflood wrote:
What's the "zing"?


PS Levels+Saturation+USM



May 22, 2009 at 07:23 PM
wing tong
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #9 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


PetKal wrote:
Bird Sighting Alert. The fabled Wing Tong Egret seen in a Southern Ontario marsh.


Jealous! I hear we get that way when we get old and useless and have too much time on our hands... Go out and shoot some real birds for a change, Peter, we know you still have a few feeble shots left in those used hands of yours! Better than spending your old age lonely behind a computer taking my photography out of context and making a mockery out of it unprovoked for over 2 months now and intertwined over a dozen posts. Don't fret, Canon will come out with that fabled 10-stop IS !!! hahaha...

Petkal sighting: ...hey peter, the bird is that white thingy behind you!!!
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3311/3554778265_681bb32f0f_o.jpg

Edited on May 22, 2009 at 11:53 PM · View previous versions



May 22, 2009 at 07:28 PM
toddmitchell
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #10 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


noelle wrote:
Peter...I love the composition in #2

yep



May 22, 2009 at 07:30 PM
PetKal
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #11 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


wing tong wrote:
Go out and shoot some real birds for a change,


Sure thing, Wing. How's this Wing Tong Plover ?

Edited on Nov 16, 2009 at 09:17 PM · View previous versions



May 22, 2009 at 07:46 PM
wing tong
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #12 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


PetKal wrote:
Sure thing, Wing. How's this Wing Tong Plover ?


Not bad, but you should've used a longer lens or perhaps your reaction time is not what it used to be with those longer lenses? By the way, I think I've seen this one before....hmmm repeating oneself, senility settles in...



May 22, 2009 at 07:50 PM
M Vers
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #13 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Peter, I think you caught yourself a Wing Tong Killdeer*

I don't own a 400/5.6, but there's always room for a 100-400 shot here and there...
100-400+1.4x
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3374/3555324620_b891586bcc_b.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2454/3555326202_4b89ce0f11_b.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3647/3554519919_80fe851b5d_b.jpg



May 22, 2009 at 07:55 PM
M Vers
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #14 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


PetKal wrote:
Wing, you are probably thinking of this image where I documented my first ever sighting of the Wing Tong Plover.


...Still a Killdeer

Edited on May 22, 2009 at 07:59 PM · View previous versions



May 22, 2009 at 07:59 PM
PetKal
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #15 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


M Vers wrote:
Peter, I think you caught yourself a Wing Tong Killdeer*

I don't own a 400/5.6, but there's always room for a 100-400 shot here and there...
100-400+1.4x



Those are veritable beauties, Matt.



May 22, 2009 at 07:59 PM
M Vers
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #16 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


PetKal wrote:
Those are veritable beauties, Matt.


Why thank you, kind Sir. Twas my first BCNHIF



May 22, 2009 at 08:03 PM
PetKal
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #17 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!




Why thank you, kind Sir. Twas my first BCNHIF



Geez, that's some accomplishment, with the slowish 100-400 to boot.
The first one is particularly good as it flies full force, beautifully angled wings, nicely sharp and exposed. That belongs on the wall, Matt.



May 22, 2009 at 08:07 PM
Methodical
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.70 #18 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


noelle wrote:
Ok.... here is a little sweet family for you. \

http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f322/noellezale/decem%2007/MF8B1930copy2.jpg

http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f322/noellezale/decem%2007/duckscopy.jpg

http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f322/noellezale/decem%2007/2duckcopy.jpg

http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f322/noellezale/decem%2007/1duckcopy.jpg



I just up on this thread...interesting as I have the 400 5.6 also (just over 2 months old) and really need and want to learn how to shoot manually - I mainly shoot aperture priority. But I had to comment on this photo. These are some really nice photos of the family I enjoyed them. I see you shot it with manual exposure is it difficult. Also it seems that you were able to get real close to the family for these photos - are able to get close to them or are you using some kind of blind or are you cropping them?

Thanks for any info.

Al



May 22, 2009 at 08:11 PM
wing tong
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.70 #19 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


PetKal wrote:
Wing, you are probably thinking of this image where I documented my first ever sighting of the Wing Tong Plover.
Your young memory seems to be heavily burdened by the pressures of your job.


Hmmm, you are correct Mr. Kal. There were 2 of these shots, you've been busy old man, perhaps time for your nap??



May 22, 2009 at 08:57 PM
pingflood
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.70 #20 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Methodical wrote:
I see you shot it with manual exposure is it difficult.


I'm no noelle, but I often prefer to shoot with manual exposure. When you remain in the same light it's often easier to do so than fiddle with the camera's various metering modes and trying to get them to do what you want. The camera will meter entirely different exposures when you point it towards the sky vs the ground even if the light remains the same, so the same bird might go from overexposed with a dark background to underexposed with a light background. What I do--and mind you, I am nowhere near in the same league as most of the people posting on this thread--is pick a 'reasonable' looking area (with enough range to tell me if the exposure is too high or too low), fiddle with aperture and shutter until the camera tells me the metering is right, fire off a frame, and then inspect the histogram and look for blinkies in the highlights. If everything looks good I'll run with that exposure; if not I'll adjust the aperture/shutter until it does. Then I'll use that exposure setting as long as the light doesn't change.

When carrying the camera in changing light conditions I usually leave it in Av (aperture priority) mode though.



May 22, 2009 at 09:08 PM
1       2       3              69              71              103       104       end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              69              71              103       104       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account