fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              68              70              157       158       end
  

Archive 2008 · Canon 5DII rumors thread

  
 
helimat
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.69 #1 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


Yohan Pamudji wrote:
There's some debate about where the lines are, but generally speaking when "pro features" are discussed they include (but not necessarily limited to) pro AF (again, what constitutes "pro" is kind of nebulous--you'll know it when you see it type thing), weather sealing, 100% viewfinder, solid body construction (compare the creaky CF door on the 5D to the solid door on the 1 series for instance), etc. If I had to give a loose definition of pro features I'd say that they're features above and beyond typical features that enable users to simply get the shot, no matter what
...Show more

I think a 'pro camera' is any camera that is used to earn money. I believe a lot of people use the 5D for professional photography, especially in the wedding photography business, even with a mode dial and 9 point AF.



Sep 09, 2008 at 11:57 AM
David Baldwin
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #2 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


Looking at the Luminous Landscape preview:

"The estimated price for this camera is AUD3999 for a body-only. Given that this is well under half that of the well regarded Canon 1DsM3, and that the images are very close in quality, then this has to be a great deal. You could buy the body and two top Zeiss lenses for much the same as the Canon."

Comparable image quality to the 1DsM3, for a dramatically lower price. Seems to me that the DSLR market has just shifted in terms of value for money. Only thing so far that would put me off is the lack of a proper Live View feature.



Sep 09, 2008 at 11:58 AM
bobbytan
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #3 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


What happened? I thought this was a thread about electronic flash .... and then I blinked .... and it became a thread about the Sony A900. Wow ....


Sep 09, 2008 at 12:03 PM
jamesf99
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #4 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


Marcus Watts wrote:
Also James for many professionals the current 5D has enough features for their needs.

I myself would be happy with more megapixels, some focus improvement though it would not sway my decision, in camera sensor cleaning.

What are you calling professional level features? Zero is a big call when as i say many pros will use the current 5D now.



I'm a full time studio photographer and have been for years. I use 5ds in the studio, and shift between 1 series and a 5d frequently. The difference is significant. I like the 5d IQ and will continue to use it unless I move to medium format, which I may do in 6 months when/if Nikon releases their speculated camera. It will be the end of a 30+ year relationship with Canon.

Oh well, back on track...IMO, and I can't stress that enough, this is MY opinion....

Professional features that will NOT be present include, AF, full weather sealing, 100% VF, FPS above what will probably be an anemic 4 FPS vis-a-vis the D700 and Sony a900, fast UDMA support (provided yet inefficient implementation), large RAW/jpeg buffers, and absolutely anything else Canon can and will use to differentiate the lowly 5d from the 1 series.

I also believe that Canon will not be dropping their 1 series prices until absolutely forced, and that day has not come. My contention is also that the D3 is old news, its effect has been felt and ignored, and the D700/A900 are not pro level cameras. PMA will tell us what's really going on, but for the 5d level camera, Canon will price accordingly but would rather sell fewer than drop 1 series prices. It's that simple....

Canon, business as usual. I no longer really trust the company... The last minute 1D3 pricing change to gouge an extra $500 from people compounded by the AF fiasco has, again, IMO, shown Canon to be an overly greedy and unresponsive company. Yes, I understand pricing strategies and monopoly behavior, but that was a very clumsy, ham-fisted gouge and the denials were offensive to those that were really affected. I had two 1D3s but I'm not a sports shooter so I only count myself as one that was inconvenienced, not harmed as others were.



Sep 09, 2008 at 12:06 PM
David Manning
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #5 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


A 5DII with 50D features would be fine with me. It seems like everyone wants a 1DsIII at $2500. To everyone who wants a D700, go get one! Canon will release precisely what they want. If the 5DII has the same 9 point autofocus pattern as the 20D, 5D, 30D, 40D and 50D, but nails the focus, is that pro level? Or does it have to be 45 points? Does the 1DIII or 1DsIII have pro level focus? Does any current Canon offering have pro level focus? If you read these threads, you wouldn't think so. Really, what is it that you people want? What I've read lately is, "Look Canon, look what Sony did. Give us something like that! It sucks!"


Sep 09, 2008 at 12:07 PM
jamesf99
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #6 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


bobbytan wrote:
What happened? I thought this was a thread about electronic flash .... and then I blinked .... and it became a thread about the Sony A900. Wow ....




Bobby,

we can always start a "why the heck doesn't the A900 have a flash" argument, er, uh, melee, er, I mean discussion, if it would make you feel at home.



Sep 09, 2008 at 12:08 PM
Marcus Watts
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #7 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


Yervant and jerry ghionis both use 5d's. now there are two guys for whom money is no problem.

In fact yervant used to use a 20d as his second body.

The autofocus on the current 5D is fine. I've never had a problem shooting portraits and weddings and kids running around at 100 miles an hour.

The term weathersealing too is a bit misleading in that it gives the impression that the camera is going to blow up at the first sign of rain.

d series weather sealing is what i would want if i was working for national geographic. Anything else and it is virtually pointless.




Sep 09, 2008 at 12:10 PM
lexvo
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #8 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


What happens when there's no news on September 12? Will we be dissapointed and fill another 55 pages talking about that?

I'm OK, I'm going to have some nice Scotch whisky with friends on Friday



Sep 09, 2008 at 12:15 PM
stanj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.69 #9 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


Does this remind anyone of the 1Ds release, and the Kodak 14n just a few days later? Where the "better", cheaper Kodak was to kill the Canon and force Canon to lower the price? Which as we all see, clearly happened...


Sep 09, 2008 at 12:16 PM
Marcus Watts
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #10 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


Are they saying the 12th?


Sep 09, 2008 at 12:17 PM
ACElkins
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #11 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


stevei wrote:
I was just comparing these two images from the Sony 900 and 1Ds III:
Sony 900 Tower Bridge
1Ds III Tower Bridge

The 1Ds III image looks far better to me.


What bothers me the most about comparing these 2 images is the fact that the Sony image is only sharp in the center, but the sides and corners are very soft. At that distance, infinity focus should have the entire frame in proper focus. If this is the IQ you get from the Sony/Zeiss lenses, I would say the lenses available for the Sony system are "Zeiss in Name Only".

At least the Canon image is sharp over the entire frame, assume they used a Canon lens on the 1Ds, but I also have the advantage of using Leica, (Real) Zeiss, Nikon, Olympus and other lenses on my 1Ds. Assume the mount of the Sony would be very limiting in alternative lens use so you will be stuck with whatever lenses Sony decides to market.

And Yes, agree the image from the 1Ds M3 is far superior to the Sony Image.



Sep 09, 2008 at 12:18 PM
Ralph Conway
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #12 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


Marcus Watts wrote:
I've never had a problem shooting ... kids running around at 100 miles an hour.


Beautifull!





Sep 09, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Yohan Pamudji
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #13 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


Let's not confuse "pro features" with "features on cameras that pros use". Admittedly "pro features" is a sloppy term as it leaves itself open for misinterpretation, but that's the parlance of our times so we're stuck with it for now.

Above, I've listed the features most people here would consider pro features, so I won't repeat those. Saying that this or that pro photographer uses a camera that doesn't have those features doesn't mean that those features aren't in the category of pro features. And using a camera that doesn't have those features doesn't stop one from making money with said camera.

So yes I know the terminology is confusing, but for the sake of discussion let's not debate the merits of the term. It is what it is, and we can carry on a discussion about a set of features designated as pro features without muddying it with claims that pros don't need those features to succeed, because such a statement while true is also irrelevant.



Sep 09, 2008 at 12:23 PM
celo
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #14 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


James
Can you tell us about the Nikon medium format while we wait for the new 5D?
thanks



Sep 09, 2008 at 12:30 PM
Mark Shaxted
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #15 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


Yohan Pamudji wrote:
Let's not confuse "pro features" with "features on cameras that pros use". Admittedly "pro features" is a sloppy term as it leaves itself open for misinterpretation, but that's the parlance of our times so we're stuck with it for now.

Above, I've listed the features most people here would consider pro features, so I won't repeat those. Saying that this or that pro photographer uses a camera that doesn't have those features doesn't mean that those features aren't in the category of pro features. And using a camera that doesn't have those features doesn't stop one from making money with
...Show more

To my mind, the only 'pro' feature in ANY tool is robust design (aka durability). Beyond that there are simply features which make life easier. Let us not forget that for a VERY long time photographers have made amazing sports images with manual focus & manual film advance.

Edited on Sep 09, 2008 at 12:31 PM



Sep 09, 2008 at 12:31 PM
jamesf99
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #16 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


Ralph Conway wrote:
I think you donīt like to hear it, james. But I still care about IQ only.


I have to use my cameras for work. I care about both. In this case, however, you'll get what you want, so don't worry. The 5d2 will have every amateur feature possible and probably great IQ, so you'll be happy as a clam in another week or two.

If the 5d2 would only offer 15MP and nativ ISO 3200 at the actual 5Ds 800 IQ and change nothing else, it still would be my choise against all other now existing cameras. If it offers me more resolution, affordable nativ ISO 6400 and a shutter lifetime of 200.000 cycles it will be my camera for the next 3-5 years, I guess. I can live with an external BG, even I would prefere an integrated one. I can live with the actual AF really good because its great. I can live without the features and whatever else that a camera makes...Show more


I think you made your point, and if I counted correctly, you've made 2,713 times in this thread. Or did I miss a few.

Yes, it's clear. You want an amateur level camera, I want a small sized professional level camera. You win. You will have a 50d with FF sensor in two weeks.

You are right in one thing: looking back in a few years, the IQ will be the only thing for me that still matters. What you call a "sucky body" was and still is an exellent tool at an affordable price to me. Maybe my "short term memory lapses" give me the pleasure, you seem not be able to feel. I am sad about that for you.

Don't be sad. just understand that I'm not playing games with this stuff.Recognize that there are others out there. like me, that use these cameras as tools to get paid, and the features they provide either make our lives easier or more difficult. I have never questioned, not once, the 5ds IQ, but I'll say again the the AF and the 3 FPS is a joke. Great for a wedding where the bride is standing their with a fake smile plastered on her weary face, but for anything more challenging, it falls short. It just can't keep up and the 3 FPS can't help.

I want a small sized FF, professional level camera, with no excuses. That's not to be had by any mfg right now, simply because they don't want to provide it. I have no hope at the 1 series level so 5d was my only option.. I can't read the future so I don't know exactly what it will be like, but after all the rumors it sounds like a real snoozer.

Now Canon could surprise us all, but I really think the next wave is PMA, not PK...

But concerning me my "sucking" Canon tools helped me to become a photographer. By doing pictures, that my customers buy. Not by holding a "pro" body in my hands, I can not purchase.

Lets wait another few days. I am really sure, Canon will give me what I want and need. Maybe itīs good enough for you, too. I would wish you.


Thanks Ralph, but don't get defensive about a camera. It's a hammer. I've purchased 4 5d bodies over the years, but to tell you the truth, the rumored replacement is probably not good enough..

I'm only going by rumors and the 50d, which was a real let down for me. Some love it. Some people like George Bush too.

The 1Ds3 (though the IQ is good) is a joke at $8k and should have a $5k retail price. Even if I can "write it off", it comes out of my pocket. If I can do the job for $3k, I'm not going to throw away $5k just to brag about owning an expensive (over priced) camera.. My job is to provide the best images I can for the needs of my clients first, and then my personal work. I just hope that the tools can be shared, and that's why I had my hopes up that Canon would do right by us all...

I hope it's more than either one of us expect. If so, you'll win big time and I'll be satisfied.



Sep 09, 2008 at 12:31 PM
jamesf99
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #17 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


celo wrote:
James
Can you tell us about the Nikon medium format while we wait for the new 5D?
thanks



Very tentative rumors. I have no idea if they're true, but it's conceivable. There will be a big announcement at WPPI early next year, but I'm not betting on it though.... Those rumors could also turn into a rehased D3 with video...



Sep 09, 2008 at 12:34 PM
globalkiwi
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #18 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


Marcus Watts wrote:
Are they saying the 12th?


Actually, I had the date of the 12th in my mind too & based on the recent trajectory of this thread had decided to not bother reading it again - thinking I only had days to wait for *real* news. Then I realized that the 12th was just a wishfully fabricated date from earlier in this very thread! I think the realistic date for concrete news - as opposed to teasers & translated pages from Serbo-Croatian web sites - is Photokina which I believe is the 23rd(?). In other words, no relief from this for at least TWO weeks!



Sep 09, 2008 at 12:52 PM
lexvo
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #19 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


I thought I read some people saying that the NDA's would end on the 12th. I can be wrong of course



Sep 09, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Ralph Conway
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #20 · Canon 5DII rumors thread


jamesf99 wrote:
I'm only going by rumors and the 50d, which was a real let down for me. Some love it. Some people like George Bush too.

The 1Ds3 (though the IQ is good) is a joke at $8k and should have a $5k retail price. Even if I can "write it off", it comes out of my pocket. If I can do the job for $3k, I'm not going to throw away $5k just to brag about owning an expensive (over priced) camera.. My job is to provide the best images I can for the needs of my clients first, and then
...Show more

:-) I am full with you James (concerning above).
Some love George Bush. 1Ds is a joke at $8K. Your hopes.

Sorry I mentioned my opinion 3.71 times in this thread. Three times it happened because of yours beeing told 3 times as far I remembered, too.

Because I am not as strong in business like you (for real) I have much time. Fewer money. When I saw 50D in a 40 Body I got a lovely (to me) idea. Why not taking the camera with best IQ and Viewfinder and doing a design study on it creating something really comfortable in my hands. I am used to but of course I do not like that all existing cameras seem to be created for japanese sized hands and feel so uncomfortable like all photographers are carpenters (?). Of course one could add some features, too. And (what I do not understood it was never done) reverse the design for left handed people. That should not be so difficult for companies, who sell millions of cameras.

Even if no company would care about, it might give us some pleasure. Interested?

Ralph


Edited on Sep 09, 2008 at 12:59 PM



Sep 09, 2008 at 12:58 PM
1       2       3              68              70              157       158       end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              68              70              157       158       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account