brunobarolo wrote:
That is a throughput of 81.9 mpix/s. The 50D does 95 mpix/s. Why should they artificially cripple a camera they make such a hype about? The days they could act this way are gone. They have to compete now. I don't believe these specs.
brunobarolo wrote:
That is a throughput of 81.9 mpix/s. The 50D does 95 mpix/s. Why should they artificially cripple a camera they make such a hype about? The days they could act this way are gone. They have to compete now. I don't believe these specs.
There could be several reasons for lower data throughput. For example: extra assist focus points would require more complex calculations by the Digit CPU when using servo mode.
brunobarolo wrote:
That is a throughput of 81.9 mpix/s. The 50D does 95 mpix/s. Why should they artificially cripple a camera they make such a hype about? The days they could act this way are gone. They have to compete now. I don't believe these specs.
weird thing crivera has a good record and insists 4fps but i found another guy with an equally good record who insists it is not 4fps and a litle better AF than hinted at here.... let's hope other guy is correct.
Sean Mills wrote:
That is indeed the 1 series viewfinder shape. Not the same as the original 5d at all.
The mode dial just throws me off. Otherwise I would have thought we were looking at a 1d3N or something.