Imagemaster Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
And some interesting comments from Les:
The pictures that I posted were all converted using the ACR beta that has preliminary support for the 50D. Out of curiosity, I took the original RAW files and tried converting them using DPP. Comparing the ACR versions with the DPP versions at 100%, the amount of noise in the DPP versions was somewhat lower than it was in the ACR versions. It was close enough, though, that at anything less than 100%, I wouldn't notice the difference. I thought about posting the DPP versions here, but, because they were relatively relatively close, it didn't seem to be worth the time it would take to prepare them and upload them first to my website server. In any case, even with the ACR versions, when I look at the prints I made from them, I'm not seeing any noise, and it is what happens in the print that is important to me. Further, I really do think that we have all been spoiled by just how good the equipment that we are using is. As an aside, I'm looking forward to a Capture One update that supports the 50D. I really don't like either ACR or DPP, and I look forward to returning to my normal workflow where I am more comfortable that I'm getting the best I can out of the files.
Also, I don't remember my 10D's high ISO performance with the same fondness that Gene does. I do think that it did quite well at ISO 400, and I think that the improvements at 400 in camera generations up to the present have been modest, but, at 800, starting with the 20D, there were significant improvements, and, with the 40D and 50D, there were significant improvements beyond 800. I'd say that, at 1600 and 3200, my 1DIII is still significantly better than the 50D, but, again, at 800 with the 50D, I'm not seeing any noise in the prints, and that is what matters to me.
Les ...Show more →
|