This topic is in the 2008 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 2008Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
p.12 #1Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 2,8/5cm T
 |
||
| http://gallery.me.com/ralph.schoberth/100048/tessar/web.jpg | ||
|
Feb 18, 2009 at 11:59 AM
p.12 #2Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
cavewalker, for some reason I find that shot humerous. What's the native mount?
Feb 19, 2009 at 08:10 AM
p.12 #4Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
@thrice
Maybe its the whole big chunky body but absolutly tiny up front where it really counts thing...
Maybe its the whole big chunky body but absolutly tiny up front where it really counts thing...
Feb 19, 2009 at 10:05 AM
p.12 #5Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
thrice wrote:
cavewalker, for some reason I find that shot humerous. What's the native mount?
it's M42 mount!
i guess it's the tiniest prime lens
cavewalker, for some reason I find that shot humerous. What's the native mount?
it's M42 mount!
i guess it's the tiniest prime lens
Feb 19, 2009 at 01:18 PM
p.12 #6Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
Thought I'd bump this thread with a photo of my latest pickup.
Rokkor 58/1.2
-Kyle
Rokkor 58/1.2
-Kyle
Feb 25, 2009 at 07:47 PM
p.12 #7Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
<a href=http://i40./egwn4l.jpg target=_blank><img src=http://i40./egwn4l_th.jpg></a>
Feb 25, 2009 at 09:54 PM
p.12 #8Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
oops...
http://i40./2gxdz83.jpg
http://i40./2yvussg.jpg
http://i40./egwn4l.jpg
http://i40./2gxdz83.jpg
http://i40./2yvussg.jpg
http://i40./egwn4l.jpg
Feb 25, 2009 at 10:04 PM
p.12 #10Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
Not so glamour, but had to kill some time in hotel while in business trip.
My most recent addition to my Zeiss "family" from left to right Sonnars T* 2.8/135, 3.5/100 and 2.8/85 and Planar T* 1.7/50 - Shoot in hotel room table with Panasonic LX-3, which has decent bokeh (the small amount there is available)
http://www.vahonen.com/resources/External_FM_20090227.jpg
Otherwise lenses seem pretty normal Zeiss lenses but Sonnar at f/4 the aperture has wierd shape, almost "ninja-star":
http://www.vahonen.com/resources/External_FM_20090227B.jpg
Edited on Feb 27, 2009 at 06:32 AM · View previous versions
My most recent addition to my Zeiss "family" from left to right Sonnars T* 2.8/135, 3.5/100 and 2.8/85 and Planar T* 1.7/50 - Shoot in hotel room table with Panasonic LX-3, which has decent bokeh (the small amount there is available)
http://www.vahonen.com/resources/External_FM_20090227.jpg
Otherwise lenses seem pretty normal Zeiss lenses but Sonnar at f/4 the aperture has wierd shape, almost "ninja-star":
http://www.vahonen.com/resources/External_FM_20090227B.jpg
Edited on Feb 27, 2009 at 06:32 AM · View previous versions
Feb 27, 2009 at 06:12 AM
p.12 #12Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
My newest acquisition: OM Zuiko 50 f/3.5 macro. Great little lens. I really like the Zuikos...I might try and pick up a 50 f/1.8 for a few bucks.
http://www.jordansteele.com/forumlinks/oly50-1.jpg
http://www.jordansteele.com/forumlinks/1DII-oly50.jpg
http://www.jordansteele.com/forumlinks/oly50-1.jpg
http://www.jordansteele.com/forumlinks/1DII-oly50.jpg
Feb 28, 2009 at 07:43 AM
p.12 #13Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
I'll take a group shot later of all my leica glass I now have 19, 28, 35, 90 and 100 mm R mount lenses. Probably the best "bargain" one was the 28 which I paid 574 euro for delivered, which arrived today in flawless condition aside from some bubbling in the glue holding an element in, we'll see if this affects image quality when I test it later.
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/3100/28f28.jpg
You can see the magic twinkling inside it
this lens is very small as well.
I now have 19, 28, 35, 90 and 100 mm R mount lenses. Probably the best "bargain" one was the 28 which I paid 574 euro for delivered, which arrived today in flawless condition aside from some bubbling in the glue holding an element in, we'll see if this affects image quality when I test it later.http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/3100/28f28.jpg
You can see the magic twinkling inside it
this lens is very small as well.Mar 08, 2009 at 11:45 PM
p.12 #14Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
My newest: OM Zuiko 55mm f1.2 Silvernose ... the one with the "rare earth" elements
|
||
| http://gallery.me.com/ralph.schoberth/100152/IMGP0105/web.jpg | ||
|
Mar 08, 2009 at 11:52 PM
p.12 #16Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
thrice wrote:
I'll take a group shot later of all my leica glass I now have 19, 28, 35, 90 and 100 mm R mount lenses. Probably the best "bargain" one was the 28 which I paid 574 euro for delivered, which arrived today in flawless condition aside from some bubbling in the glue holding an element in, we'll see if this affects image quality when I test it later.
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/3100/28f28.jpg
You can see the magic twinkling inside it this lens is very small as well.
This lens disease is commonly known as "Schneideritis", as it often is found in Schneider lenses of the 60's and 70's. Should not have any effect on Image Quality, you got a great deal on that lens!
I'll take a group shot later of all my leica glass
I now have 19, 28, 35, 90 and 100 mm R mount lenses. Probably the best "bargain" one was the 28 which I paid 574 euro for delivered, which arrived today in flawless condition aside from some bubbling in the glue holding an element in, we'll see if this affects image quality when I test it later.http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/3100/28f28.jpg
You can see the magic twinkling inside it
this lens is very small as well.This lens disease is commonly known as "Schneideritis", as it often is found in Schneider lenses of the 60's and 70's. Should not have any effect on Image Quality, you got a great deal on that lens!
Mar 09, 2009 at 07:32 AM
p.12 #17Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
Props to whomever posted the f/0.95! ;-)
-Ed
-Ed
Mar 09, 2009 at 12:48 PM
p.12 #18Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
|
||
| http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3262/3213217205_e26ac8c685_o.jpg | ||
|
Nice and soft because I sucked at handholding that day :P
Mar 09, 2009 at 06:20 PM
p.12 #19Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
First I'd like to thank everyone here for their valuable input to this forum, and especially Cogitech, his contribution has reignited my passion for photography, it really had become "a job". It is ridiculous that one lens could change my whole outlook, but it did. Again, thanks.
Dave
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3543/3344381651_b46753e06b_m.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3344/3344382787_5f1da121cc_m.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3403/3344382221_f276b23ef8_m.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3356/3345218078_c46e30362c_m.jpg
Dave
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3543/3344381651_b46753e06b_m.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3344/3344382787_5f1da121cc_m.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3403/3344382221_f276b23ef8_m.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3356/3345218078_c46e30362c_m.jpg
Mar 10, 2009 at 02:58 PM
p.12 #20Glamour shots of the lenses themselves
Great pics David! And I gotta know what hood that is
Mar 10, 2009 at 03:45 PM