Post your recent film shots!
p.923 #3Post your recent film shots!
Keahi08 wrote:
Helimat - Really nice shots with this film. I've had ups and downs with Fomapan 400, usually downs when I've tried pushing it. Hard to say, but there have been many shots with your collapsible Summicron, where I have felt that you are getting a wider field of view than I do with my v4.
Thanks! I should compare it to my two other 50's, the Summilux Asph and the recently picked up Heliar 50/3.5.
---------------------------------------------
Desmolicious wrote:
I find these affordable films like Foma, Arista and Kentmere to be excellent. No issues whatsoever and I'll pick them over TriX and HP5 because I don't get 'better' results with those films. But I do save a lot using the cheapos - in my wallet not in quality!
Actually the only one I have an issue with is Foma 400, because it really seems to be an ISO 200 film. Rated at that then everything is fine. All the current Arista films are repackaged Fomas.
Now that you mention it, I do believe I rated it at 200. But I wasn't aware it was repackaged Foma... But I like it at any rate.
Here's few more from that roll with the same kit;
Helimat - Really nice shots with this film. I've had ups and downs with Fomapan 400, usually downs when I've tried pushing it. Hard to say, but there have been many shots with your collapsible Summicron, where I have felt that you are getting a wider field of view than I do with my v4.
Thanks! I should compare it to my two other 50's, the Summilux Asph and the recently picked up Heliar 50/3.5.
---------------------------------------------
Desmolicious wrote:
I find these affordable films like Foma, Arista and Kentmere to be excellent. No issues whatsoever and I'll pick them over TriX and HP5 because I don't get 'better' results with those films. But I do save a lot using the cheapos - in my wallet not in quality!
Actually the only one I have an issue with is Foma 400, because it really seems to be an ISO 200 film. Rated at that then everything is fine. All the current Arista films are repackaged Fomas.
Now that you mention it, I do believe I rated it at 200. But I wasn't aware it was repackaged Foma... But I like it at any rate.
Here's few more from that roll with the same kit;
Apr 04, 2022 at 07:52 PM
p.923 #4Post your recent film shots!
Leica CL, Leica Summicron 50mm f/2 v3, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2021.10.10 Roll #291-06641-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
2021.10.10 Roll #291-06641-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Apr 04, 2022 at 09:00 PM
p.923 #5Post your recent film shots!
Did you pull process it then, or develop as if you'd shot it at box speed?
helimat wrote:
Thanks! I should compare it to my two other 50's, the Summilux Asph and the recently picked up Heliar 50/3.5.
---------------------------------------------
Actually the only one I have an issue with is Foma 400, because it really seems to be an ISO 200 film. Rated at that then everything is fine. All the current Arista films are repackaged Fomas.Now that you mention it, I do believe I rated it at 200. But I wasn't aware it was repackaged Foma... But I like it at any rate.
Here's few more from that roll with the same kit;
helimat wrote:
Keahi08 wrote
Helimat - Really nice shots with this film. I've had ups and downs with Fomapan 400, usually downs when I've tried pushing it. Hard to say, but there have been many shots with your collapsible Summicron, where I have felt that you are getting a wider field of view than I do with my v4.---------------------------------------------
Desmolicious wrote
I find these affordable films like Foma, Arista and Kentmere to be excellent. No issues whatsoever and I'll pick them over TriX and HP5 because I don't get 'better' results with those films. But I do save a lot using the cheapos - in my wallet not in quality!Actually the only one I have an issue with is Foma 400, because it really seems to be an ISO 200 film. Rated at that then everything is fine. All the current Arista films are repackaged Fomas.
Here's few more from that roll with the same kit;
Apr 04, 2022 at 09:06 PM
p.923 #6Post your recent film shots!
Jman13 wrote:
Did you pull process it then, or develop as if you'd shot it at box speed?
Thanks! I should compare it to my two other 50's, the Summilux Asph and the recently picked up Heliar 50/3.5.
---------------------------------------------
Actually the only one I have an issue with is Foma 400, because it really seems to be an ISO 200 film. Rated at that then everything is fine. All the current Arista films are repackaged Fomas.Now that you mention it, I do believe I rated it at 200. But I wasn't aware it was repackaged Foma... But I like it at any rate.
Here's few more from that roll with the same kit;
Not answering for helimat, but I rate it at 200, and develop it regularly at box speed i.e. no change. Works perfect.
Did you pull process it then, or develop as if you'd shot it at box speed?
helimat wrote
Keahi08 wrote
Helimat - Really nice shots with this film. I've had ups and downs with Fomapan 400, usually downs when I've tried pushing it. Hard to say, but there have been many shots with your collapsible Summicron, where I have felt that you are getting a wider field of view than I do with my v4.---------------------------------------------
Desmolicious wrote
I find these affordable films like Foma, Arista and Kentmere to be excellent. No issues whatsoever and I'll pick them over TriX and HP5 because I don't get 'better' results with those films. But I do save a lot using the cheapos - in my wallet not in quality!Actually the only one I have an issue with is Foma 400, because it really seems to be an ISO 200 film. Rated at that then everything is fine. All the current Arista films are repackaged Fomas.
Here's few more from that roll with the same kit;
Not answering for helimat, but I rate it at 200, and develop it regularly at box speed i.e. no change. Works perfect.
Apr 05, 2022 at 12:23 AM
p.923 #7Post your recent film shots!
Mamiya 645 with 35mm f/3.5 and 80mm f/2.8, Ilford PanF+ 50, Df96. I liked the film frame on the first shot.
I'm not sure about the 35mm. I've shot a bit with it on two rolls, and it has just massive field curvature. It's decent on the close edges, but distant edges are pretty awful, going to mush. It's really a shame, as I have always loved the approx. 90 degree angle of view...but I don't know if I can keep it if I can't figure out how to shoot with it. I'm thinking of returning it and finding a good copy of the 45mm f/2.8 N, which supposedly is pretty good, though there are one or two shots that are decent, and I'm trying to remember how I shot them. Perhaps I need to just shoot to the hard infinity stop any time I'm outside. Need to try to test that before I'm outside any option to return the lens.
I'm not sure about the 35mm. I've shot a bit with it on two rolls, and it has just massive field curvature. It's decent on the close edges, but distant edges are pretty awful, going to mush. It's really a shame, as I have always loved the approx. 90 degree angle of view...but I don't know if I can keep it if I can't figure out how to shoot with it. I'm thinking of returning it and finding a good copy of the 45mm f/2.8 N, which supposedly is pretty good, though there are one or two shots that are decent, and I'm trying to remember how I shot them. Perhaps I need to just shoot to the hard infinity stop any time I'm outside. Need to try to test that before I'm outside any option to return the lens.
Apr 05, 2022 at 10:53 AM
RoamingScott
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.923 #8Post your recent film shots!
YT4 on Superia 400
 |
||
 |
||
|
Apr 05, 2022 at 11:15 AM
p.923 #9Post your recent film shots!
One more with the M645, 35mm f/3.5, PanF Plus 50, Df96:
Apr 05, 2022 at 11:46 AM
p.923 #10Post your recent film shots!
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2021.10.23 Roll #292-06663-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
2021.10.23 Roll #292-06663-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Apr 05, 2022 at 09:00 PM
|
p.923 #11Post your recent film shots!
Jman13 wrote:
Did you pull process it then, or develop as if you'd shot it at box speed?
Like Huss said, I metered at 200, developed normally.
Canon EOS 1 + Zeiss ZE 25/2 + Arista EDU Ultra 400
Did you pull process it then, or develop as if you'd shot it at box speed?
Like Huss said, I metered at 200, developed normally.
Canon EOS 1 + Zeiss ZE 25/2 + Arista EDU Ultra 400
Apr 05, 2022 at 09:08 PM
p.923 #12Post your recent film shots!
A few shots from a walk around the neighbourhood. M6 + Collapsible Summicron + Kodak UltraMax 400
Apr 06, 2022 at 05:31 PM
p.923 #13Post your recent film shots!
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2021.11.06 Roll #293-06688-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
2021.11.06 Roll #293-06688-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Apr 06, 2022 at 06:00 PM
p.923 #16Post your recent film shots!
XP2 Super
EOS 3
EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM
Edited on Apr 08, 2022 at 08:42 AM · View previous versions
EOS 3
EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM
Edited on Apr 08, 2022 at 08:42 AM · View previous versions
Apr 07, 2022 at 06:35 PM
p.923 #17Post your recent film shots!
Canon EOS 1 + Zeiss ZE 25/2 + Kodak Portra 400
Apr 07, 2022 at 07:32 PM
p.923 #18Post your recent film shots!
M6 + V1 Collapsible Summicron 50 + Kodak Tmax 400
Apr 08, 2022 at 06:06 PM
p.923 #19Post your recent film shots!
definitely a noob when it comes to shooting film. 2nd roll through my newly acquired Nikon F5 - expired kodak p3200 TMAX. Just wanted to see if I could still grab focus in normal work environments really.
and one of my doggo sporting the cone of shame
and one of my doggo sporting the cone of shame
Apr 08, 2022 at 07:27 PM
p.923 #20Post your recent film shots!
When I first started shooting some film again, I started with 35mm, and found that color film in 35mm just left me feeling flat...it was too far below the quality I am used to with digital, and it just didn't work for me. B&W in 35mm works fine, though. However, now that I've put a few rolls of film through my 645 camera, I wanted to shoot a couple rolls of color film to see how it looked on 645, and holy cow, what a difference. The tonality, the detail..everything just looks so much better. Can see myself shooting a lot of color in the future. I've always liked Ektar, so I put a roll of Ektar through, as well as a roll of Gold 200 through my M645 over the past couple of days. Here are some shots from those...I'll post more tomorrow.
M645, Mamiya 150mm f/3.5, Kodak Ektar 100:
M645, Mamiya 150mm f/3.5, Kodak Ektar 100:
M645, Mamiya 80mm f/2.8, Kodak Gold 200:
M645, Mamiya 35mm f/3.5, Kodak Gold 200:
M645, Mamiya 150mm f/3.5, Kodak Ektar 100:
M645, Mamiya 35mm f/3.5, Kodak Gold 200:
M645, Mamiya 150mm f/3.5, Kodak Ektar 100:
M645, Mamiya 150mm f/3.5, Kodak Ektar 100:
M645, Mamiya 80mm f/2.8, Kodak Gold 200:
M645, Mamiya 35mm f/3.5, Kodak Gold 200:
M645, Mamiya 150mm f/3.5, Kodak Ektar 100:
M645, Mamiya 35mm f/3.5, Kodak Gold 200:
Apr 08, 2022 at 10:03 PM