Post your recent film shots!
p.700 #1Post your recent film shots!
Here's a couple from my last rolls of Delta 3200 which I fired off last weekend on my F4. Both were shot wide open with the 50mm f/1.8 AF (pre-D if that makes any difference). I really need to get a better focusing screen though for using my 28 f/2 and 55 f/2.8 AIS lenses 
ILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
ILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
ILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on FlickrILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on FlickrApr 29, 2018 at 09:31 PM
p.700 #2Post your recent film shots!
AbramG wrote:
Here's a couple from my last rolls of Delta 3200 which I fired off last weekend on my F4. Both were shot wide open with the 50mm f/1.8 AF (pre-D if that makes any difference). I really need to get a better focusing screen though for using my 28 f/2 and 55 f/2.8 AIS lenses
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/871/41076146704_a34454505d_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/863/39985581840_343bb42228_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
Those are great shots. Makes me want to try Delta 3200 in 35mm. I've only ever shot this film in 120 size.
Here's a couple from my last rolls of Delta 3200 which I fired off last weekend on my F4. Both were shot wide open with the 50mm f/1.8 AF (pre-D if that makes any difference). I really need to get a better focusing screen though for using my 28 f/2 and 55 f/2.8 AIS lenses
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/871/41076146704_a34454505d_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/863/39985581840_343bb42228_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
Those are great shots. Makes me want to try Delta 3200 in 35mm. I've only ever shot this film in 120 size.
May 01, 2018 at 03:03 AM
p.700 #3Post your recent film shots!
rattymouse wrote:
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/871/41076146704_a34454505d_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/863/39985581840_343bb42228_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on FlickrThose are great shots. Makes me want to try Delta 3200 in 35mm. I've only ever shot this film in 120 size.
Thanks! I don't actually really love the film in 35mm, I think it's far better in 120 format personally. I do however like Kodak TMAX 3200 (the reissued one), that strikes me as more usable high speed emulsion.
AbramG wrote
Here's a couple from my last rolls of Delta 3200 which I fired off last weekend on my F4. Both were shot wide open with the 50mm f/1.8 AF (pre-D if that makes any difference). I really need to get a better focusing screen though for using my 28 f/2 and 55 f/2.8 AIS lenseshttps://farm1.staticflickr.com/871/41076146704_a34454505d_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/863/39985581840_343bb42228_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
Thanks! I don't actually really love the film in 35mm, I think it's far better in 120 format personally. I do however like Kodak TMAX 3200 (the reissued one), that strikes me as more usable high speed emulsion.
May 01, 2018 at 04:27 PM
p.700 #4Post your recent film shots!
AbramG wrote:
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/871/41076146704_a34454505d_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/863/39985581840_343bb42228_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on FlickrThose are great shots. Makes me want to try Delta 3200 in 35mm. I've only ever shot this film in 120 size.Thanks! I don't actually really love the film in 35mm, I think it's far better in 120 format personally. I do however like Kodak TMAX 3200 (the reissued one), that strikes me as more usable high speed emulsion.
Very nice shots Abram.
I really have the feeling, when I look at my old darkroom prints from 30++ years ago, that scanning film doesn't do it justice. If it was still feasible, I would very much prefer to make wet prints from negatives and scan them with a quality flatbed scanner (for online posting). Your shots would look much better when wet printed, and you won't feel much need for shooting medium format
rattymouse wrote
AbramG wrote
Here's a couple from my last rolls of Delta 3200 which I fired off last weekend on my F4. Both were shot wide open with the 50mm f/1.8 AF (pre-D if that makes any difference). I really need to get a better focusing screen though for using my 28 f/2 and 55 f/2.8 AIS lenseshttps://farm1.staticflickr.com/871/41076146704_a34454505d_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/863/39985581840_343bb42228_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
Very nice shots Abram.
I really have the feeling, when I look at my old darkroom prints from 30++ years ago, that scanning film doesn't do it justice. If it was still feasible, I would very much prefer to make wet prints from negatives and scan them with a quality flatbed scanner (for online posting). Your shots would look much better when wet printed, and you won't feel much need for shooting medium format
May 01, 2018 at 10:19 PM
p.700 #5Post your recent film shots!
AbramG wrote:
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/871/41076146704_a34454505d_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/863/39985581840_343bb42228_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on FlickrThose are great shots. Makes me want to try Delta 3200 in 35mm. I've only ever shot this film in 120 size.Thanks! I don't actually really love the film in 35mm, I think it's far better in 120 format personally. I do however like Kodak TMAX 3200 (the reissued one), that strikes me as more usable high speed emulsion.
I agree with Edward. Your shots will look beautiful wet printed vs scanned. The grain, already quite emotive, will simply melt away a bit more.
rattymouse wrote
AbramG wrote
Here's a couple from my last rolls of Delta 3200 which I fired off last weekend on my F4. Both were shot wide open with the 50mm f/1.8 AF (pre-D if that makes any difference). I really need to get a better focusing screen though for using my 28 f/2 and 55 f/2.8 AIS lenseshttps://farm1.staticflickr.com/871/41076146704_a34454505d_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/863/39985581840_343bb42228_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
I agree with Edward. Your shots will look beautiful wet printed vs scanned. The grain, already quite emotive, will simply melt away a bit more.
May 01, 2018 at 10:23 PM
p.700 #6Post your recent film shots!
You guys aren’t wrong! I definitely miss working in a darkroom. It’s been far FAR too long. For now at least I am satisfied with scanning mostly (I use a Coolscan 4000ED) but I hope that someday I’ll get to build a darkroom.
Actually I already have the OK from my wife for when we buy a home, if we have the space I get to make a darkroom for myself!
Actually I already have the OK from my wife for when we buy a home, if we have the space I get to make a darkroom for myself!
May 02, 2018 at 10:07 AM
p.700 #7Post your recent film shots!
edwardkaraa wrote:
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/871/41076146704_a34454505d_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/863/39985581840_343bb42228_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on FlickrThose are great shots. Makes me want to try Delta 3200 in 35mm. I've only ever shot this film in 120 size.Thanks! I don't actually really love the film in 35mm, I think it's far better in 120 format personally. I do however like Kodak TMAX 3200 (the reissued one), that strikes me as more usable high speed emulsion.Very nice shots Abram.
I really have the feeling, when I look at my old darkroom prints from 30++ years ago, that scanning film doesn't do it justice. If it was still feasible, I would very much prefer to make wet prints from negatives and scan them with a quality flatbed scanner (for online posting). Your shots would look much better when wet printed, and you won't feel much need for shooting medium format
I was giving this some thought while listening to music yesterday. I've just started a Tidal subscription, and the sound quality is fantastic. But... for some of the classic analogue recordings that I also have on vinyl, it's quite clear that the digital conversions can't follow the original. Something is "lost in translation", and the artistic expression suffers.
I was wondering to what degree this would be relevant for film, but my feeling is that it is. I haven't been in a darkroom for decades, but I'm increasingly tempted to go back to that process for some personal work, doing wet prints.
AbramG wrote
rattymouse wrote
AbramG wrote
Here's a couple from my last rolls of Delta 3200 which I fired off last weekend on my F4. Both were shot wide open with the 50mm f/1.8 AF (pre-D if that makes any difference). I really need to get a better focusing screen though for using my 28 f/2 and 55 f/2.8 AIS lenseshttps://farm1.staticflickr.com/871/41076146704_a34454505d_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/863/39985581840_343bb42228_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
I really have the feeling, when I look at my old darkroom prints from 30++ years ago, that scanning film doesn't do it justice. If it was still feasible, I would very much prefer to make wet prints from negatives and scan them with a quality flatbed scanner (for online posting). Your shots would look much better when wet printed, and you won't feel much need for shooting medium format
I was giving this some thought while listening to music yesterday. I've just started a Tidal subscription, and the sound quality is fantastic. But... for some of the classic analogue recordings that I also have on vinyl, it's quite clear that the digital conversions can't follow the original. Something is "lost in translation", and the artistic expression suffers.
I was wondering to what degree this would be relevant for film, but my feeling is that it is. I haven't been in a darkroom for decades, but I'm increasingly tempted to go back to that process for some personal work, doing wet prints.
May 02, 2018 at 11:46 PM
p.700 #8Post your recent film shots!
Jorgen Udvang wrote:
edwardkaraa wrote
AbramG wrote
rattymouse wrote
AbramG wrote
Here's a couple from my last rolls of Delta 3200 which I fired off last weekend on my F4. Both were shot wide open with the 50mm f/1.8 AF (pre-D if that makes any difference). I really need to get a better focusing screen though for using my 28 f/2 and 55 f/2.8 AIS lenseshttps://farm1.staticflickr.com/871/41076146704_a34454505d_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/863/39985581840_343bb42228_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
I really have the feeling, when I look at my old darkroom prints from 30++ years ago, that scanning film doesn't do it justice. If it was still feasible, I would very much prefer to make wet prints from negatives and scan them with a quality flatbed scanner (for online posting). Your shots would look much better when wet printed, and you won't feel much need for shooting medium format
I was wondering to what degree this would be relevant for film, but my feeling is that it is. I haven't been in a darkroom for decades, but I'm increasingly tempted to go back to that process for some personal work, doing...Show more →
I feel that it’s mostly in the highlights and shadows that scanning falls short. Wet prints have a certain rendering where you can have pure whites and pure blacks that are esthetically pleasing and I rarely see that in scanned film.
May 03, 2018 at 04:56 AM
p.700 #10Post your recent film shots!
edwardkaraa wrote:
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/871/41076146704_a34454505d_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/863/39985581840_343bb42228_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on FlickrThose are great shots. Makes me want to try Delta 3200 in 35mm. I've only ever shot this film in 120 size.Thanks! I don't actually really love the film in 35mm, I think it's far better in 120 format personally. I do however like Kodak TMAX 3200 (the reissued one), that strikes me as more usable high speed emulsion.Very nice shots Abram.
I really have the feeling, when I look at my old darkroom prints from 30++ years ago, that scanning film doesn't do it justice. If it was still feasible, I would very much prefer to make wet prints from negatives and scan them with a quality flatbed scanner (for online posting). Your shots would look much better when wet printed, and you won't feel much need for shooting medium formatI was giving this some thought while listening to music yesterday. I've just started a Tidal subscription, and the sound quality is fantastic. But... for some of the classic analogue recordings that I also have on vinyl, it's quite clear that the digital conversions can't follow the original. Something is "lost in translation", and the artistic expression suffers.
I was wondering to what degree this would be relevant for film, but my feeling is that it is. I haven't been in a darkroom for decades, but I'm increasingly tempted to go back to that process for some personal work, doing wet prints.I feel that it’s mostly in the highlights and shadows that scanning falls short. Wet prints have a certain rendering where you can have pure whites and pure blacks that are esthetically pleasing and I rarely see that in scanned film.
100% agree!
Jorgen Udvang wrote
edwardkaraa wrote
AbramG wrote
rattymouse wrote
AbramG wrote
Here's a couple from my last rolls of Delta 3200 which I fired off last weekend on my F4. Both were shot wide open with the 50mm f/1.8 AF (pre-D if that makes any difference). I really need to get a better focusing screen though for using my 28 f/2 and 55 f/2.8 AIS lenseshttps://farm1.staticflickr.com/871/41076146704_a34454505d_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_13.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/863/39985581840_343bb42228_b.jpgILFD_D3200_4_18_35.jpg by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
I really have the feeling, when I look at my old darkroom prints from 30++ years ago, that scanning film doesn't do it justice. If it was still feasible, I would very much prefer to make wet prints from negatives and scan them with a quality flatbed scanner (for online posting). Your shots would look much better when wet printed, and you won't feel much need for shooting medium format
I was wondering to what degree this would be relevant for film, but my feeling is that it is. I haven't been in a darkroom for decades, but I'm increasingly tempted to go back to that process for some personal work, doing wet prints.
100% agree!
May 04, 2018 at 04:42 PM
|
p.700 #11Post your recent film shots!
A bit Off topic, but figured this board was as likely to know as any... any thoughts on the Bronica S2A? Sold my ETRS a while back and regret it. Pretty sure I’m going to get an S2A kit with 50, 75 and 150 Nikkors, but thought I’d get some input. Thanks regardless.
May 04, 2018 at 05:05 PM
p.700 #12Post your recent film shots!
Mathieu18 wrote:
A bit Off topic, but figured this board was as likely to know as any... any thoughts on the Bronica S2A? Sold my ETRS a while back and regret it. Pretty sure I’m going to get an S2A kit with 50, 75 and 150 Nikkors, but thought I’d get some input. Thanks regardless.
Over in the Nikon Manual Focus Glass thread, one of the guys there, Saph, uses one I believe. Very nice output.
May 04, 2018 at 07:13 PM
p.700 #13Post your recent film shots!
Thanks, I’ll check it out.
kwoodard wrote:
Over in the Nikon Manual Focus Glass thread, one of the guys there, Saph, uses one I believe. Very nice output.
kwoodard wrote:
Mathieu18 wrote
A bit Off topic, but figured this board was as likely to know as any... any thoughts on the Bronica S2A? Sold my ETRS a while back and regret it. Pretty sure I’m going to get an S2A kit with 50, 75 and 150 Nikkors, but thought I’d get some input. Thanks regardless.May 04, 2018 at 07:40 PM
p.700 #14Post your recent film shots!
Mamiya RZ67 Pro (6x7 cm) with Mamiya 65/4 K/L lens with Fuji Velvia 100F slide film, home developed with E-6. Scanned with Epson V850. Colors directly out of the box, no PP other than deleting some dust spots and slight highlight/contrast adjustments.
 |
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
May 05, 2018 at 07:30 AM
p.700 #18Post your recent film shots!
Hasswlblad SWC - Orange Filter - Kodak TMAX400 developed in XTOL stock - scanning a Nikon Coolscan 8000
2018-04-16-0003 by Nicholas T, on Flickr
2018-05-05-0002 by Nicholas T, on Flickr
2018-05-05-0011 by Nicholas T, on Flickr
2018-04-16-0003 by Nicholas T, on Flickr2018-05-05-0002 by Nicholas T, on Flickr2018-05-05-0011 by Nicholas T, on FlickrMay 06, 2018 at 12:41 AM
p.700 #19Post your recent film shots!
Fujifilm TX-1, 90mm f/5.6, Neopan Acros.
May 06, 2018 at 06:05 AM
p.700 #20Post your recent film shots!
Got two 5 packs of old, expired 2003 Kodak supra 400. Figured it was roasted bad and shot a roll rated at 125. The results were actually pretty good. A bit of a color shift that was for the most part, easily adjusted in LR with the WB sliders. Anyways, here are some from the first roll.
Nikon Series e 75-150/3.5 on a FM2n
Nikon Series e 75-150/3.5 on a FM2n
May 06, 2018 at 10:38 AM