Post your recent film shots!
p.696 #3Post your recent film shots!
More from walking the alleys of Shanghai. Acros 100.
Apr 01, 2018 at 02:39 AM
p.696 #4Post your recent film shots!
rattymouse wrote:
Fujifilm TX-1 w/30mm f/5.6 lens. Sadly, I can't recall the name of this temple in Kyoto.
http://farm1.staticflickr.com/791/26269128997_619ed6855c_b.jpg
That's beautiful, Tom. Perhaps a bit larger so that we could enjoy more of the detail?
Fujifilm TX-1 w/30mm f/5.6 lens. Sadly, I can't recall the name of this temple in Kyoto.
http://farm1.staticflickr.com/791/26269128997_619ed6855c_b.jpg
That's beautiful, Tom. Perhaps a bit larger so that we could enjoy more of the detail?
Apr 01, 2018 at 06:13 AM
p.696 #6Post your recent film shots!
edwardkaraa wrote:
http://farm1.staticflickr.com/791/26269128997_619ed6855c_b.jpgThat's beautiful, Tom. Perhaps a bit larger so that we could enjoy more of the detail?
I dont know how large I can post without blowing up the forum. Here's one size larger.
rattymouse wrote
Fujifilm TX-1 w/30mm f/5.6 lens. Sadly, I can't recall the name of this temple in Kyoto.http://farm1.staticflickr.com/791/26269128997_619ed6855c_b.jpg
I dont know how large I can post without blowing up the forum. Here's one size larger.
Apr 01, 2018 at 03:26 PM
p.696 #7Post your recent film shots!
Mamiya RZ67 Pro, Mamiya 110/2.8 Z-lens, Fuji Velvia 100F slide 120 film, home-developed with E-6 process. Scanned with Epson V850.
Edited on Apr 02, 2018 at 05:46 AM · View previous versions
 |
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Edited on Apr 02, 2018 at 05:46 AM · View previous versions
Apr 02, 2018 at 05:41 AM
p.696 #8Post your recent film shots!
Mamiya RZ67 Pro, Mamiya 110/2.8 Z-lens, expired Kodak PanX 125 B&W 120 film, home-developed with Rodinal (1:50). Scanned with Epson V850.
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Apr 02, 2018 at 05:45 AM
p.696 #9Post your recent film shots!
Nice Retro. How do you like your V850?
Apr 02, 2018 at 08:08 AM
p.696 #10Post your recent film shots!
Gary Clennan wrote:
Nice Retro. How do you like your V850?
Hi Gary, thanks
. The V850 is a very good scanner, but it has its little cons, too. First, for large and medium format it is excellent - IQ is superb and scanning at 3200 dpi is quite fast. The Epson scanner software wasn't updated recently, but it works fine and is in some aspects a bit better than SilverFast 8 when it comes to sharpening and dust removal. Where the V850 gave me some trouble in the beginning was for 35 mm based negatives - I formerly used the Plustek 8200i scanner where the files came out crisp sharp without additional PP. The V850 requires a certain amount of PP sharpening in the scanner software to get to the same results. The medium value in the Epson scanner software is about the right setting, Silverfast 8 uses an arbitrary sharpening scale which needs more sharpening than I was formerly used to with this software. The Epson software has a thumbnail view which automatically does some PP to the scanned image which I don't like - it cuts automatically off quite a large border of 35 mm negatives within the film holder. Better to use the normal mode instead in the Epson software and crop the frames of each negative myself. This is a bit cumbersome process and I wish Epson would release an upgrade of its software just for this.
Another simple source of unsharpness is an added supposedly beneficial design of the new film holders - height adjustable feet to accommodate for different slide/film strip thickness. It turned out often a source of issues in my case - the feet easily misadjust by moving the positions. I always make sure now that the feet are in the lowest position before inserting the film holder in the scanner!
Nice Retro. How do you like your V850?
Hi Gary, thanks
. The V850 is a very good scanner, but it has its little cons, too. First, for large and medium format it is excellent - IQ is superb and scanning at 3200 dpi is quite fast. The Epson scanner software wasn't updated recently, but it works fine and is in some aspects a bit better than SilverFast 8 when it comes to sharpening and dust removal. Where the V850 gave me some trouble in the beginning was for 35 mm based negatives - I formerly used the Plustek 8200i scanner where the files came out crisp sharp without additional PP. The V850 requires a certain amount of PP sharpening in the scanner software to get to the same results. The medium value in the Epson scanner software is about the right setting, Silverfast 8 uses an arbitrary sharpening scale which needs more sharpening than I was formerly used to with this software. The Epson software has a thumbnail view which automatically does some PP to the scanned image which I don't like - it cuts automatically off quite a large border of 35 mm negatives within the film holder. Better to use the normal mode instead in the Epson software and crop the frames of each negative myself. This is a bit cumbersome process and I wish Epson would release an upgrade of its software just for this. Another simple source of unsharpness is an added supposedly beneficial design of the new film holders - height adjustable feet to accommodate for different slide/film strip thickness. It turned out often a source of issues in my case - the feet easily misadjust by moving the positions. I always make sure now that the feet are in the lowest position before inserting the film holder in the scanner!
Apr 02, 2018 at 09:02 AM
|
p.696 #11Post your recent film shots!
retrofocus wrote:
Hi Gary, thanks . The V850 is a very good scanner, but it has its little cons, too. First, for large and medium format it is excellent - IQ is superb and scanning at 3200 dpi is quite fast. The Epson scanner software wasn't updated recently, but it works fine and is in some aspects a bit better than SilverFast 8 when it comes to sharpening and dust removal. Where the V850 gave me some trouble in the beginning was for 35 mm based negatives - I formerly used the Plustek 8200i scanner where the files came out crisp sharp...Show more →
Such great info - thanks. I saw one locally for a very good deal and may try it out. I also own the 8200i for 35mm but now am shooting much more 120. My V500 is very outdated and I feel I can get better scans if I upgrade. What are the benefits of the V850 compared to the V800?
Gary Clennan wrote
Nice Retro. How do you like your V850?. The V850 is a very good scanner, but it has its little cons, too. First, for large and medium format it is excellent - IQ is superb and scanning at 3200 dpi is quite fast. The Epson scanner software wasn't updated recently, but it works fine and is in some aspects a bit better than SilverFast 8 when it comes to sharpening and dust removal. Where the V850 gave me some trouble in the beginning was for 35 mm based negatives - I formerly used the Plustek 8200i scanner where the files came out crisp sharp...Show more →Such great info - thanks. I saw one locally for a very good deal and may try it out. I also own the 8200i for 35mm but now am shooting much more 120. My V500 is very outdated and I feel I can get better scans if I upgrade. What are the benefits of the V850 compared to the V800?
Apr 02, 2018 at 11:21 AM
p.696 #12Post your recent film shots!
Gary Clennan wrote:
Hi Gary, thanks . The V850 is a very good scanner, but it has its little cons, too. First, for large and medium format it is excellent - IQ is superb and scanning at 3200 dpi is quite fast. The Epson scanner software wasn't updated recently, but it works fine and is in some aspects a bit better than SilverFast 8 when it comes to sharpening and dust removal. Where the V850 gave me some trouble in the beginning was for 35 mm based negatives - I formerly used the Plustek 8200i scanner where the files came out crisp sharp without additional PP. The V850 requires a certain amount of PP sharpening in the scanner software to get to the same results. The medium value in the Epson scanner software is about the right setting, Silverfast 8 uses an arbitrary sharpening scale which needs more sharpening than I was formerly used to with this software. The Epson software has a thumbnail view which automatically does some PP to the scanned image which I don't like - it cuts automatically off quite a large border of 35 mm negatives within the film holder. Better to use the normal mode instead in the Epson software and crop the frames of each negative myself. This is a bit cumbersome process and I wish Epson would release an upgrade of its software just for this.
Another simple source of unsharpness is an added supposedly beneficial design of the new film holders - height adjustable feet to accommodate for different slide/film strip thickness. It turned out often a source of issues in my case - the feet easily misadjust by moving the positions. I always make sure now that the feet are in the lowest position before inserting the film holder in the scanner!Such great info - thanks. I saw one locally for a very good deal and may try it out. I also own the 8200i for 35mm but now am shooting much more 120. My V500 is very outdated and I feel I can get better scans if I upgrade. What are the benefits of the V850 compared to the V800?
Not quite sure about the differences between V800 and V850 - I simply got a very good deal recently as refurbished V850 model for $800, so I went for it. I should also mention it works well for document scans, too.
retrofocus wrote
Gary Clennan wrote
Nice Retro. How do you like your V850?. The V850 is a very good scanner, but it has its little cons, too. First, for large and medium format it is excellent - IQ is superb and scanning at 3200 dpi is quite fast. The Epson scanner software wasn't updated recently, but it works fine and is in some aspects a bit better than SilverFast 8 when it comes to sharpening and dust removal. Where the V850 gave me some trouble in the beginning was for 35 mm based negatives - I formerly used the Plustek 8200i scanner where the files came out crisp sharp without additional PP. The V850 requires a certain amount of PP sharpening in the scanner software to get to the same results. The medium value in the Epson scanner software is about the right setting, Silverfast 8 uses an arbitrary sharpening scale which needs more sharpening than I was formerly used to with this software. The Epson software has a thumbnail view which automatically does some PP to the scanned image which I don't like - it cuts automatically off quite a large border of 35 mm negatives within the film holder. Better to use the normal mode instead in the Epson software and crop the frames of each negative myself. This is a bit cumbersome process and I wish Epson would release an upgrade of its software just for this. Another simple source of unsharpness is an added supposedly beneficial design of the new film holders - height adjustable feet to accommodate for different slide/film strip thickness. It turned out often a source of issues in my case - the feet easily misadjust by moving the positions. I always make sure now that the feet are in the lowest position before inserting the film holder in the scanner!
Not quite sure about the differences between V800 and V850 - I simply got a very good deal recently as refurbished V850 model for $800, so I went for it. I should also mention it works well for document scans, too.
Apr 02, 2018 at 11:45 AM
p.696 #14Post your recent film shots!
Nice Tom! Don't burn through all that Acros though!
Apr 02, 2018 at 05:58 PM
p.696 #16Post your recent film shots!
Is there a film thread?
Is there a Leica thread.
I'm looking at a Leica M3 bit don't know what lens I can out on it. Is. 50 the only thing I can use.
Is there a list of M3 lens
Is there a Leica thread.
I'm looking at a Leica M3 bit don't know what lens I can out on it. Is. 50 the only thing I can use.
Is there a list of M3 lens
Apr 03, 2018 at 09:41 PM
p.696 #17Post your recent film shots!
Bought nice shot. I see it was with an M5. How do you like it. What lens do you prefer ok that body
Thinking about getting the M3
Desmolicious wrote:
Leica M5, CV 35 1.2v2, Portra 400
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/789/40245240435_6983469c64_o.jpg
Thinking about getting the M3
Desmolicious wrote:
Leica M5, CV 35 1.2v2, Portra 400
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/789/40245240435_6983469c64_o.jpg
Apr 03, 2018 at 09:43 PM
p.696 #18Post your recent film shots!
AHPZuazua wrote:
Is there a film thread?
Is there a Leica thread.
I'm looking at a Leica M3 bit don't know what lens I can out on it. Is. 50 the only thing I can use.
Is there a list of M3 lens
You’re in the film thread currently. There’s a very active Leica thread as well in the Alternative board. You can put any lens you want on and M3 you just have to use an external viewfinder if it’s not a 50,90 or 135mm lens. There’s also goggled 35mm lenses which were avaialable specifically for the M3.
Is there a film thread?
Is there a Leica thread.
I'm looking at a Leica M3 bit don't know what lens I can out on it. Is. 50 the only thing I can use.
Is there a list of M3 lens
You’re in the film thread currently. There’s a very active Leica thread as well in the Alternative board. You can put any lens you want on and M3 you just have to use an external viewfinder if it’s not a 50,90 or 135mm lens. There’s also goggled 35mm lenses which were avaialable specifically for the M3.
Apr 03, 2018 at 10:44 PM
p.696 #20Post your recent film shots!
Naptime with Logan.
Nikon F4 / 55mm f/2.8 Micro AIS / Kodak TMAX 400
KODK_TMY400_3_18_62 by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
KODK_TMY400_3_18_63 by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
KODK_TMY400_3_18_65 by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
KODK_TMY400_3_18_67 by Abram Goglanian, on Flickr
Nikon F4 / 55mm f/2.8 Micro AIS / Kodak TMAX 400
KODK_TMY400_3_18_62 by Abram Goglanian, on FlickrKODK_TMY400_3_18_63 by Abram Goglanian, on FlickrKODK_TMY400_3_18_65 by Abram Goglanian, on FlickrKODK_TMY400_3_18_67 by Abram Goglanian, on FlickrApr 04, 2018 at 12:24 PM