Going to report all you secret double agents unless you share with me some of your good old film! ! Great work guys, don't worry we will keep it on the down low.
wayne seltzer wrote:
Going to report all you secret double agents unless you share with me some of your good old film! ! Great work guys, don't worry we will keep it on the down low.
Trying to use my Hasselblad more often. I have a new long-term project I'm planning out right now and it's going to be an integral part of it so I gotta get reacquainted with my old love!
Gunzorro wrote:
Hi Jae -- Maybe a little overexposed here? But great shot, and super sharp details!
Looking forward to more of your adventures with the Pentax gear.
Thanks for the compliment.
Frankly, I think the exposure looks fine. I prefer film shots that are overexposed anyway
Will be posting a few more shortly.
Thanks.
I love seeing your results Jae, I've long wanted to try a P67II and may have the chance here soon. I think for me the 55mm f/4 and 105mm f/2.4 would be my ideal pair of lenses.
Gunzorro wrote:
Jae -- These shots look so crisp with your limited depth of field! Nice. Okay, I see you are going for a high key effect for your beautiful wife.
Can you tell us which lenses were used, and how are you scanning?
Thanks!
Thanks again.
I'm still a newbie so I like to shoot with shallow depth of field but often times it's hard to nail focus with medium format but I'm getting better at it haha.
Shots #1,3,4 are taken with 165mm f2.8 and shot #2 was taken with 45mm f4 lens.
I would like to say I process and scan myself but I send my film to a lab.
One day I hope to at least scan myself but with the baby on the way, not anytime soon haha.
Those 2 lenses are terrific.
Great performances wide open as well.
I also have a Mamiya 6 but I really prefer the traditional SLR form factor over RF.
It's a heavy camera but if a skinny dude like me can carry the camera with 4-5 lenses hiking through national parks you can definitely do it haha. Go for it!