Post your recent film shots!
p.1538 #1Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
madNbad wrote
Switched to the six minute development Ilford recommends for HP-5+ in Rodinal. The negatives were much better but many needed a boost in contrast and very few without any manipulation.Currently, I have one 250 ml bottle of Rodinal and was trying to figure out the fastest way to finish it. A one liter tank holds two rolls of 120 film, a 1:25 dilution uses 38 ml of concentrated developer. I bought twelve rolls of HP-5 specifically for this project. The goal is to use up both the Rodinal and any 120 film that isn’t Tri-X. I like Bellini’s RDL and have had good results using it to develop Tri-X in a 1:50 dilution.
Aug 11, 2025 at 09:02 AM
p.1538 #2Post your recent film shots!
Some Pan F shots in SF North Beach and China Town. M3, C-Sonnar, PanF, XTOL
Aug 11, 2025 at 09:51 AM
p.1538 #4Post your recent film shots!
Fuji GSW690II, Kentmere Pan 200, Red 25 filter, film rated at 50, Xtol-R, 7:15 at 68F
These are from my first two 120 rolls of this film. Also the first use of the red filter.
These are from my first two 120 rolls of this film. Also the first use of the red filter.
Aug 11, 2025 at 10:47 AM
p.1538 #6Post your recent film shots!
zi464 wrote:
N90 + Portra 400
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713096736_5eb9e56e04_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713096741_b750ae986f_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713432520_ff2302946a_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713302443_2b91029c0b_b.jpg
Love that first one
N90 + Portra 400
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713096736_5eb9e56e04_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713096741_b750ae986f_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713432520_ff2302946a_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713302443_2b91029c0b_b.jpg
Love that first one
Aug 11, 2025 at 01:19 PM
p.1538 #7Post your recent film shots!
geekcop wrote:
Expired 250D and expended Bellini C-41 chems. Funky looking but I like it.
I dig it!
Expired 250D and expended Bellini C-41 chems. Funky looking but I like it.
I dig it!
Aug 11, 2025 at 01:52 PM
p.1538 #8Post your recent film shots!
zi464 wrote:
N90 + Portra 400
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713096736_5eb9e56e04_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713096741_b750ae986f_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713432520_ff2302946a_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713302443_2b91029c0b_b.jpg
You gotta be kidding me...
N90 + Portra 400
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713096736_5eb9e56e04_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713096741_b750ae986f_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713432520_ff2302946a_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713302443_2b91029c0b_b.jpg
You gotta be kidding me...
Aug 11, 2025 at 01:53 PM
|
p.1538 #11Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
You gotta be kidding me...
You gotta be kidding me...
Aug 11, 2025 at 02:34 PM
p.1538 #12Post your recent film shots!
James Markus wrote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713096736_5eb9e56e04_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713096741_b750ae986f_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713432520_ff2302946a_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713302443_2b91029c0b_b.jpgLove that first one
Thank you
zi464 wrote
N90 + Portra 400https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713096736_5eb9e56e04_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713096741_b750ae986f_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713432520_ff2302946a_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54713302443_2b91029c0b_b.jpg
Thank you
Aug 11, 2025 at 02:34 PM
p.1538 #13Post your recent film shots!
zi464 wrote:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/kid
Get it?
Desmolicious wrote
You gotta be kidding me... https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/kid
Get it?
Aug 11, 2025 at 04:02 PM
p.1538 #14Post your recent film shots!
A few more from the first time out with the Yashica D.
Yashica D, HP-5+. Rodinal 1:25
Dead Albertsons' Bike Rack
SW Watson, Beaverton, Oregon
Mural Detail (Adjusted)
I cleaned the taking lens and shined a light through it. It didn't look too bad and I have a hood arriving soon which should hep with the lens flare.
Yashica D, HP-5+. Rodinal 1:25
Dead Albertsons' Bike Rack
SW Watson, Beaverton, Oregon
Mural Detail (Adjusted)
I cleaned the taking lens and shined a light through it. It didn't look too bad and I have a hood arriving soon which should hep with the lens flare.
Aug 11, 2025 at 04:48 PM
p.1538 #15Post your recent film shots!
zi464 wrote:
Baby goats….
Desmolicious wrote
You gotta be kidding me... Baby goats….
Aug 11, 2025 at 06:48 PM
p.1538 #17Post your recent film shots!
Round Lake Trail (West) #12E26, Tahoe National Forest.
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2024.06.19 Roll #359-08919-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2024.06.19 Roll #359-08919-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Aug 11, 2025 at 10:00 PM
p.1538 #18Post your recent film shots!
So Freestylephoto was (is?) blowing out Aristapan 100 at $4/36 exp.
One would think there has to be a reason why they are getting rid of it for so cheap, right?
Yeah but not me...
Anyway, just developed my 'test' roll to see how it performs. I used what is arguably the greatest 35mm camera ever made - the Sears Mini 35 aka Ricoh FF1.
And, er, the results:
As you can see there are line marks running parallel across the image surface, as well as what seems to be defects in the emulsion.
However, I developed the film in DF96 Monobath, and then wiped the excessive water off with Kimwipes to prevent drying marks. I do this with all the film I develop, including the roll of HP5 that was also in the same dev tank.
It seems that DF96 does not play well with Aristapan 100,in as much that it makes the emulsion soft which is why there are marks from the Kimwipes. There were no such marks on the HP5.
Also the other random emulsion defects could be from the DF96. Or it could be why Freestylephoto is blowing out this film at $4/roll!
So that's what happened.
One would think there has to be a reason why they are getting rid of it for so cheap, right?
Yeah but not me...
Anyway, just developed my 'test' roll to see how it performs. I used what is arguably the greatest 35mm camera ever made - the Sears Mini 35 aka Ricoh FF1.
And, er, the results:
As you can see there are line marks running parallel across the image surface, as well as what seems to be defects in the emulsion.
However, I developed the film in DF96 Monobath, and then wiped the excessive water off with Kimwipes to prevent drying marks. I do this with all the film I develop, including the roll of HP5 that was also in the same dev tank.
It seems that DF96 does not play well with Aristapan 100,in as much that it makes the emulsion soft which is why there are marks from the Kimwipes. There were no such marks on the HP5.
Also the other random emulsion defects could be from the DF96. Or it could be why Freestylephoto is blowing out this film at $4/roll!
So that's what happened.
Aug 12, 2025 at 12:13 PM
p.1538 #19Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
So Freestylephoto was (is?) blowing out Aristapan 100 at $4/36 exp.
One would think there has to be a reason why they are getting rid of it for so cheap, right?
Yeah but not me...
Anyway, just developed my 'test' roll to see how it performs. I used what is arguably the greatest 35mm camera ever made - the Sears Mini 35 aka Ricoh FF1.
And, er, the results:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54716793523_5c5bd0a714_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54716577026_20fba2dd26_c.jpg
As you can see there are line marks running parallel across the image surface, as well as what seems to be defects in the emulsion.
However, I developed the film in DF96 Monobath, and then wiped the...Show more →
Use it like Brad does with the textured double exposures. In this case, the film comes with it's own texture!
So Freestylephoto was (is?) blowing out Aristapan 100 at $4/36 exp.
One would think there has to be a reason why they are getting rid of it for so cheap, right?
Yeah but not me...
Anyway, just developed my 'test' roll to see how it performs. I used what is arguably the greatest 35mm camera ever made - the Sears Mini 35 aka Ricoh FF1.
And, er, the results:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54716793523_5c5bd0a714_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54716577026_20fba2dd26_c.jpg
As you can see there are line marks running parallel across the image surface, as well as what seems to be defects in the emulsion.
However, I developed the film in DF96 Monobath, and then wiped the...Show more →
Use it like Brad does with the textured double exposures. In this case, the film comes with it's own texture!
Aug 12, 2025 at 12:17 PM
