Post your recent film shots!
p.1422 #1Post your recent film shots!
Tree Trunks.
Nikon F3P / CV Apo-Skopar 90 / ProImage 100
Nikon F3P / CV Apo-Skopar 90 / ProImage 100
Jan 28, 2025 at 05:45 PM
p.1422 #3Post your recent film shots!
@Desmolicious How's Daisy been feeling since falling ill? It's nice to see her in your recent pictures.
Jan 28, 2025 at 07:24 PM
p.1422 #4Post your recent film shots!
Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Motorcycle by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
I-405 by Jim Fischer, on FlickrLeica M5, Leica 35mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH 11874, Ilford HP5+, Xtol 1:1.
Jan 28, 2025 at 07:29 PM
p.1422 #5Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Fuji GW690 III
Lomography Metropolis ISO 400
Cinestill C-41Ahh yes, the blue gray/green of Metropolis!
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52545707831_e20427c88a_o.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52546002409_da6076bc22_o.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52432965999_33209414fe_o.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52431237605_489e2c7b22_o.jpg
I'm loving that blue gray/green vibe . . .
rji2goleez wrote
First time trying some Lomography Metropolis. I'm liking what I'm seeing here and think this would be great for urban shooting (Oh yeah, metropolis!)Fuji GW690 III
Lomography Metropolis ISO 400
Cinestill C-41
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52545707831_e20427c88a_o.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52546002409_da6076bc22_o.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52432965999_33209414fe_o.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52431237605_489e2c7b22_o.jpg
I'm loving that blue gray/green vibe . . .
Jan 28, 2025 at 07:51 PM
p.1422 #6Post your recent film shots!
500c
Zeiss 50 f/4 CF
Lomo Color 92 400
Zeiss 50 f/4 CF
Lomo Color 92 400
 |
||
 |
||
|
Jan 28, 2025 at 08:53 PM
p.1422 #8Post your recent film shots!
Love checking on the wreck of the Peter Iredale once every few years.
child and the wreckage of the peter iredale by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Rolleiflex T, Zeiss Tessar 75mm f/3.5, Fuji Acros 100, T-Max Developer.
child and the wreckage of the peter iredale by Jim Fischer, on FlickrRolleiflex T, Zeiss Tessar 75mm f/3.5, Fuji Acros 100, T-Max Developer.
Jan 28, 2025 at 10:08 PM
p.1422 #9Post your recent film shots!
madNbad wrote:
Zeiss 50 f/4 CF
Lomo Color 92 400Rus with a glorious clear day at the Oregon Coast in January.
About a hundred miles south at noon in the middle of July
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54043877733_ae7f8f3351_b.jpg
M4-2, Voigtlander 50 2.5 Color Skopar LTM, TMax 400, Adox XT-3
---------------------------------------------
_jim_ wrote:
Love checking on the wreck of the Peter Iredale once every few years.
https://live.staticflickr.com/6197/6037274157_d83c44e1ef_b.jpgchild and the wreckage of the peter iredale by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Rolleiflex T, Zeiss Tessar 75mm f/3.5, Fuji Acros 100, T-Max Developer.
It’s a pretty cool place-
We were in Astoria for a basketball tournament (seaside tourney) and finally checked this place out. Freezing but beautiful-
First time really using the 500 C/M and loved it. Shockingly didn’t fuck anything up!
Wish the tide would have been lower but we only had a small window-
RustyRus wrote
500cZeiss 50 f/4 CF
Lomo Color 92 400
About a hundred miles south at noon in the middle of July
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54043877733_ae7f8f3351_b.jpg
M4-2, Voigtlander 50 2.5 Color Skopar LTM, TMax 400, Adox XT-3
---------------------------------------------
_jim_ wrote:
Love checking on the wreck of the Peter Iredale once every few years.
https://live.staticflickr.com/6197/6037274157_d83c44e1ef_b.jpgchild and the wreckage of the peter iredale by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Rolleiflex T, Zeiss Tessar 75mm f/3.5, Fuji Acros 100, T-Max Developer.
It’s a pretty cool place-
We were in Astoria for a basketball tournament (seaside tourney) and finally checked this place out. Freezing but beautiful-
First time really using the 500 C/M and loved it. Shockingly didn’t fuck anything up!
Wish the tide would have been lower but we only had a small window-
Jan 28, 2025 at 10:25 PM
p.1422 #10Post your recent film shots!
geekcop wrote:
@Desmolicious@ How's Daisy been feeling since falling ill? It's nice to see her in your recent pictures.
She’s healed up thanks for asking! Xoxo
A UTI that lasted for several days but meds fixed her.
@Desmolicious@ How's Daisy been feeling since falling ill? It's nice to see her in your recent pictures.
She’s healed up thanks for asking! Xoxo
A UTI that lasted for several days but meds fixed her.
Jan 28, 2025 at 11:07 PM
|
p.1422 #12Post your recent film shots!
San José Mineta International Airport.
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2024.01.14 Roll #348-08511-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2024.01.14 Roll #348-08511-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Jan 29, 2025 at 12:00 AM
p.1422 #14Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
'Olga, Arista 200
Triple exposure because sometimes two is not enough.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54293449977_70bc59f3c7_c.jpg
Looks like a frame from a 1960’s TV cop show.
Jan 29, 2025 at 01:45 AM
p.1422 #16Post your recent film shots!
Garage by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Garage by Jim Fischer, on FlickrLeica M5, Leica 35mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH 11874, Ilford HP5+, Xtol 1:1.
Jan 29, 2025 at 10:28 AM
p.1422 #17Post your recent film shots!
Because I clearly have too much time on my hands...I did a quick and dirty comparison between my 35mm Summilux ASPH pre-FLE and the Voigtlander 35mm f/1.5 Nokton. Both lenses are wide open and focused using a 1.4x magnifier (couldn't be arsed to use a tripod though
).
First the Nokton:
TESTING by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
And the Lux
TESTING by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
And the crops:
35mm Lens Comp by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
So, what can I say? The older lux shows its age. It has lower global and micro-contrast and thus less apparent resolution. It has more blur (slightly) and the draw is a tiny bit more structured. I repeated this very informal test over a few more frames at different focus points and confirmed these findings. So, you can save $2k and get a better lens!
).First the Nokton:
TESTING by Jim Fischer, on FlickrAnd the Lux
TESTING by Jim Fischer, on FlickrAnd the crops:
35mm Lens Comp by Jim Fischer, on FlickrSo, what can I say? The older lux shows its age. It has lower global and micro-contrast and thus less apparent resolution. It has more blur (slightly) and the draw is a tiny bit more structured. I repeated this very informal test over a few more frames at different focus points and confirmed these findings. So, you can save $2k and get a better lens!
Jan 29, 2025 at 10:35 AM
p.1422 #19Post your recent film shots!
_jim_ wrote:
So, what can I say? The older lux shows its age. It has lower global and micro-contrast and thus less apparent resolution. It has more blur (slightly) and the draw is a tiny bit more structured. I repeated this very informal test over a few more frames at different focus points and confirmed these findings. So, you can save $2k and get a better lens!
I did a similar test last year. I compared my pre FLE to Leica's APO. I was wondering if an APO would make a difference on film or not. Short answer was no. The surprising answer is the pre FLE held its own against the $7k APO lens, on film at least. MP + Portra 400.
Pre FLE @ f/1.4
Pre FLE @ f/2
APO @ f/2
So, what can I say? The older lux shows its age. It has lower global and micro-contrast and thus less apparent resolution. It has more blur (slightly) and the draw is a tiny bit more structured. I repeated this very informal test over a few more frames at different focus points and confirmed these findings. So, you can save $2k and get a better lens!
I did a similar test last year. I compared my pre FLE to Leica's APO. I was wondering if an APO would make a difference on film or not. Short answer was no. The surprising answer is the pre FLE held its own against the $7k APO lens, on film at least. MP + Portra 400.
Pre FLE @ f/1.4
Pre FLE @ f/2
APO @ f/2
Jan 29, 2025 at 03:01 PM
p.1422 #20Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
I did a similar test last year. I compared my pre FLE to Leica's APO. I was wondering if an APO would make a difference on film or not. Short answer was no. The surprising answer is the pre FLE held its own against the $7k APO lens, on film at least. MP + Portra 400.
Back when I was thinking of getting the Leica 50 f2 APO (used they were going for about 60% of new cost) I checked images made by it on film. And frankly could not see any difference vs regular 50 Crons outside flare control. And for that I already have CV 50 2.2 etc.
So as I couldn't see any difference it wasn't worth it for me. Maybe it would have been different if shot on digital, but who shoots digital anymore?
_jim_ wrote
So, what can I say? The older lux shows its age. It has lower global and micro-contrast and thus less apparent resolution. It has more blur (slightly) and the draw is a tiny bit more structured. I repeated this very informal test over a few more frames at different focus points and confirmed these findings. So, you can save $2k and get a better lens!Back when I was thinking of getting the Leica 50 f2 APO (used they were going for about 60% of new cost) I checked images made by it on film. And frankly could not see any difference vs regular 50 Crons outside flare control. And for that I already have CV 50 2.2 etc.
So as I couldn't see any difference it wasn't worth it for me. Maybe it would have been different if shot on digital, but who shoots digital anymore?
Jan 29, 2025 at 03:28 PM