Post your recent film shots!
p.1210 #3Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Samsung Slim- Porta 800How do you like the Slim Zoom?Best 30 dollar camera of my life- I shot 12 rolls of film on it-
I had 5 buddies with me and every time we went surfing or out for the night, we brought it. Someone new used it every night- The pictures all come out really nice. Most were with flash.
Perfect for what I wanted it for.Love to hear that! I think someone here was shipped a broken one - that sucked. But not the camera's fault.
The Samsung takes awesome pics, super easy to use and super responsive.
It would be way more expensive if it had a fancy name on it. It actually does - it is also badged as a Rollei! And the Rollei version is like $100 more expensive!
I had the broken one but I fixed it, I think. My second one, yes I have a backup, is in better condition with a lot less dust under the display. I love them both.
RustyRus wrote
lifeandmylens wrote
RustyRus wrote
Costa Rican Morning-Samsung Slim- Porta 800
I had 5 buddies with me and every time we went surfing or out for the night, we brought it. Someone new used it every night- The pictures all come out really nice. Most were with flash.
Perfect for what I wanted it for.
The Samsung takes awesome pics, super easy to use and super responsive.
It would be way more expensive if it had a fancy name on it. It actually does - it is also badged as a Rollei! And the Rollei version is like $100 more expensive!
I had the broken one but I fixed it, I think. My second one, yes I have a backup, is in better condition with a lot less dust under the display. I love them both.
Apr 29, 2024 at 02:35 PM
p.1210 #5Post your recent film shots!
Looking through Double Arch, Arches National Park.
RETO Ultra Wide & Slim, Kodak Ultra Max 400 (expired 2019).
2022.04.19 Roll #306-0021.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
RETO Ultra Wide & Slim, Kodak Ultra Max 400 (expired 2019).
2022.04.19 Roll #306-0021.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Apr 29, 2024 at 08:00 PM
p.1210 #6Post your recent film shots!
EOS 1V + Voigtlander 40/2 + Kentmere 400
Apr 29, 2024 at 08:43 PM
p.1210 #7Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Pentax Espio 24 EW, Supra 100 @ 50
Blue Sun on sidewalk.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53688328473_4d6d6048e1_b.jpg
Read that the Espio has a DX Reader - how do you change the ISO of the film then? Thx!
Pentax Espio 24 EW, Supra 100 @ 50
Blue Sun on sidewalk.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53688328473_4d6d6048e1_b.jpg
Read that the Espio has a DX Reader - how do you change the ISO of the film then? Thx!
Apr 30, 2024 at 12:31 AM
p.1210 #8Post your recent film shots!
Ineound wrote:
Blue Sun on sidewalk.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53688328473_4d6d6048e1_b.jpgRead that the Espio has a DX Reader - how do you change the ISO of the film then? Thx!
If there is no DX on the film canister it defaults to iso 25. So I put piece of black tape over the DX code to get 25.
It is unusual though, as most cameras w DX readers will default to 100.
Also the Espio 24EW has an exposure compensation setting where you can set +- up to three stops.
Desmolicious wrote
Pentax Espio 24 EW, Supra 100 @ 50Blue Sun on sidewalk.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53688328473_4d6d6048e1_b.jpg
If there is no DX on the film canister it defaults to iso 25. So I put piece of black tape over the DX code to get 25.
It is unusual though, as most cameras w DX readers will default to 100.
Also the Espio 24EW has an exposure compensation setting where you can set +- up to three stops.
Apr 30, 2024 at 01:20 AM
|
p.1210 #11Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Unfortunately no. But I do have a photo of a cleaning service van taken with my Canon SureShot Ace.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53598548805_90cc370655_b.jpg
campy wrote
Anyone have pictures of their dog?https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53598548805_90cc370655_b.jpg
Apr 30, 2024 at 09:06 AM
p.1210 #12Post your recent film shots!
After a little hiatus, I'm back with film
M4P + Canon 50/1.4 LTM
Aurora 800
M4P + Canon 50/1.4 LTM
Aurora 800
Apr 30, 2024 at 11:59 AM
p.1210 #15Post your recent film shots!
Almost every shot on my previous roll of HP5+ was perfectly exposed, but every shot on this latest one was underexposed even though I used the same lens, same filter, and same meter. Maybe my lab goofed on development time. I did manage to salvage a few shots.
Ziplining by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
le Grand Quai du Port de Montréal by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Reflecting wall at le Grand Quai by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Ziplining by Brad Hurley, on Flickrle Grand Quai du Port de Montréal by Brad Hurley, on FlickrReflecting wall at le Grand Quai by Brad Hurley, on FlickrApr 30, 2024 at 04:13 PM
p.1210 #16Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
Almost every shot on my previous roll of HP5+ was perfectly exposed, but every shot on this latest one was underexposed even though I used the same lens, same filter, and same meter. Maybe my lab goofed on development time. I did manage to salvage a few shots.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53689418577_dc7613e8bc_c.jpgZiplining by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53690650219_561d9c3ef9_c.jpgle Grand Quai du Port de Montréal by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53690650224_f0841d4a9a_c.jpgReflecting wall at le Grand Quai by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
I recently made the change to Adox XT-3 which is similar to Xtol. I followed the agitation schedule in the Adox material for HP5+ and my negatives had too much contrast, not enough mid-tones and took more digital magic than I prefer to get usable images. Another member suggested looking at the agitation schedule from Ilford and there is a huge difference. For a small tank, Adox recommends five to seven inversion to start then five seconds every thirty seconds. Ilfords' data sheet for HP5+ states four inversions in the first ten seconds then four every minute for the remaining development time. I haven't had a chance to try it yet, every time I think the sun is going to stay out, another band of rain moves through but hopefully before the end of the week I'll post some examples. Ask your lab about their process and what developer they're using.
Here's one from my first roll of HP5 in XT-3. M4-2, Voigtlander 35 1.4 Nokton Classic SD V2, 022 yellow filter, HP5+, ISO 200 for filter factor, Adox XT-3 1+1 13 minutes at 20C. Scanned with a Sony A72, FE90 2.8 Macro
The negative was fairly dense and scanning was a bit of a challenge.
Edited on Apr 30, 2024 at 05:15 PM · View previous versions
Almost every shot on my previous roll of HP5+ was perfectly exposed, but every shot on this latest one was underexposed even though I used the same lens, same filter, and same meter. Maybe my lab goofed on development time. I did manage to salvage a few shots.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53689418577_dc7613e8bc_c.jpgZiplining by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53690650219_561d9c3ef9_c.jpgle Grand Quai du Port de Montréal by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53690650224_f0841d4a9a_c.jpgReflecting wall at le Grand Quai by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
I recently made the change to Adox XT-3 which is similar to Xtol. I followed the agitation schedule in the Adox material for HP5+ and my negatives had too much contrast, not enough mid-tones and took more digital magic than I prefer to get usable images. Another member suggested looking at the agitation schedule from Ilford and there is a huge difference. For a small tank, Adox recommends five to seven inversion to start then five seconds every thirty seconds. Ilfords' data sheet for HP5+ states four inversions in the first ten seconds then four every minute for the remaining development time. I haven't had a chance to try it yet, every time I think the sun is going to stay out, another band of rain moves through but hopefully before the end of the week I'll post some examples. Ask your lab about their process and what developer they're using.
Here's one from my first roll of HP5 in XT-3. M4-2, Voigtlander 35 1.4 Nokton Classic SD V2, 022 yellow filter, HP5+, ISO 200 for filter factor, Adox XT-3 1+1 13 minutes at 20C. Scanned with a Sony A72, FE90 2.8 Macro
The negative was fairly dense and scanning was a bit of a challenge.
Edited on Apr 30, 2024 at 05:15 PM · View previous versions
Apr 30, 2024 at 05:05 PM
p.1210 #17Post your recent film shots!
madNbad wrote:
Ask your lab about their process and what developer they're using.
I will...what's weird is that my last roll of HP5+ came out perfectly and this one didn't despite everything being exactly the same on my end. I know they've had some staff turnover and maybe a different person developed this roll; they certainly did a sloppy job with the scans as there was a ton of dust, especially on the last few shots of the roll.
Ask your lab about their process and what developer they're using.
I will...what's weird is that my last roll of HP5+ came out perfectly and this one didn't despite everything being exactly the same on my end. I know they've had some staff turnover and maybe a different person developed this roll; they certainly did a sloppy job with the scans as there was a ton of dust, especially on the last few shots of the roll.
Apr 30, 2024 at 05:09 PM
p.1210 #18Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
I will...what's weird is that my last roll of HP5+ came out perfectly and this one didn't despite everything being exactly the same on my end. I know they've had some staff turnover and maybe a different person developed this roll; they certainly did a sloppy job with the scans as there was a ton of dust, especially on the last few shots of the roll.
At least I know who to blame when my film is screwed up.
madNbad wrote
Ask your lab about their process and what developer they're using.At least I know who to blame when my film is screwed up.
Apr 30, 2024 at 05:20 PM
p.1210 #19Post your recent film shots!
madNbad wrote:
At least I know who to blame when my film is screwed up.
Haha! I would love to start developing my own film again (it's been about 45 years since I developed my last roll, when I switched from Tri-X to Kodachrome and Agfachrome), but let's just say it would upset the state of domestic tranquility in my house.
At least I know who to blame when my film is screwed up.
Haha! I would love to start developing my own film again (it's been about 45 years since I developed my last roll, when I switched from Tri-X to Kodachrome and Agfachrome), but let's just say it would upset the state of domestic tranquility in my house.
Apr 30, 2024 at 05:25 PM
p.1210 #20Post your recent film shots!
Pentax Espio SW120, Kodak 250D expired, light leak on right of frame no extra charge.
I know the image is slightly blurry but I liked it as my feeble attempt at a street photo.
I know the image is slightly blurry but I liked it as my feeble attempt at a street photo.
Apr 30, 2024 at 05:35 PM