Post your recent film shots!
p.1125 #1Post your recent film shots!
Interesting thing is the Pentax Espio 24EW defaults to ISO 25 for non DX film. So I tapped off the DX code on that 35 yr old TriX so it shot at 25.
Looks really good at iso 25! Shot in the pano mode which isn't a gimmick IMO as it makes you commit to that composition. Instead of saying you can crop later when you figure it out...
Looks really good at iso 25! Shot in the pano mode which isn't a gimmick IMO as it makes you commit to that composition. Instead of saying you can crop later when you figure it out...
Jan 08, 2024 at 12:18 PM
p.1125 #2Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Leica 1F, CV 15mm 4.5, Agfapan APX 100 @ 25
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53449229252_16354b3248_c.jpg
Great capture. I like the lines on this.
Leica 1F, CV 15mm 4.5, Agfapan APX 100 @ 25
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53449229252_16354b3248_c.jpg
Great capture. I like the lines on this.
Jan 08, 2024 at 12:21 PM
p.1125 #3Post your recent film shots!
Keahi08 wrote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53449229252_16354b3248_c.jpgGreat capture. I like the lines on this.
Thanks! I'm kinda surprised at the CV 15 4.5. Mine is the v1 and I expected it to be better on film. It's a bit smeary on the edges, even at f8. Images still are very pleasing - it has an excellent render as the kids say - but it's not a technically 'perfect' lens.
Desmolicious wrote
Leica 1F, CV 15mm 4.5, Agfapan APX 100 @ 25https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53449229252_16354b3248_c.jpg
Thanks! I'm kinda surprised at the CV 15 4.5. Mine is the v1 and I expected it to be better on film. It's a bit smeary on the edges, even at f8. Images still are very pleasing - it has an excellent render as the kids say - but it's not a technically 'perfect' lens.
Jan 08, 2024 at 12:27 PM
p.1125 #5Post your recent film shots!
A couple random first two shots of the roll. Trying not to burn the first of the roll with a picture of the floor now haha. MP + Portra 400
Jan 08, 2024 at 04:30 PM
p.1125 #6Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
A couple random first two shots of the roll. Trying not to burn the first of the roll with a picture of the floor now haha. MP + Portra 400
When the archivist started cataloging Garry Winogrand's photos they wondered about all of the exposures of this feet and legs until someone showed them how to load a Leica M.
Apparently, you're loading the camera correctly but it's ok to advance the film at least one full stroke.
The Christmas pictures were great!
A couple random first two shots of the roll. Trying not to burn the first of the roll with a picture of the floor now haha. MP + Portra 400
When the archivist started cataloging Garry Winogrand's photos they wondered about all of the exposures of this feet and legs until someone showed them how to load a Leica M.
Apparently, you're loading the camera correctly but it's ok to advance the film at least one full stroke.
The Christmas pictures were great!
Jan 08, 2024 at 06:17 PM
p.1125 #7Post your recent film shots!
madNbad wrote:
lifeandmylens wrote
A couple random first two shots of the roll. Trying not to burn the first of the roll with a picture of the floor now haha. MP + Portra 400Apparently, you're loading the camera correctly but it's ok to advance the film at least one full stroke.
The Christmas pictures were great!
Yes I have a few of my feet also haha. Thank you!
Jan 08, 2024 at 06:23 PM
p.1125 #10Post your recent film shots!
OregonSun wrote:
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes. Three individual black and white frames shot through Tiffen #25 Red, #58 Green, and #47 Blue filters, respectively, then combined using GIMP to create a trichrome color image.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53446005299_3b76387209_b.jpg
2023.04.13 Roll #330-08063-positive-trichrome.jpg by dourbalistar, on FlickrWhoa, I think I'm having flashbacks looking at this 
Did you accidentally eat some strange looking cactus out in the desert one time?
dourbalistar wrote
It was slightly overcast during the red and green filtered frames of this trichrome, but the sun broke through just before the blue filtered frame. Instead of trying to recalculate the exposure to compensate, I just carried on to see what might come out. Looks kinda like... Lomochrome Purple?Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes. Three individual black and white frames shot through Tiffen #25 Red, #58 Green, and #47 Blue filters, respectively, then combined using GIMP to create a trichrome color image.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53446005299_3b76387209_b.jpg
2023.04.13 Roll #330-08063-positive-trichrome.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Did you accidentally eat some strange looking cactus out in the desert one time?
Jan 08, 2024 at 11:19 PM
|
p.1125 #11Post your recent film shots!
dourbalistar wrote:
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes. Three individual black and white frames shot through Tiffen #25 Red, #58 Green, and #47 Blue filters, respectively, then combined using GIMP to create a trichrome color image.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53446005299_3b76387209_b.jpg
2023.04.13 Roll #330-08063-positive-trichrome.jpg by dourbalistar, on FlickrWhoa, I think I'm having flashbacks looking at this Did you accidentally eat some strange looking cactus out in the desert one time?
Well, it wasn't cactus I ate, but you're on the right track
OregonSun wrote
dourbalistar wrote
It was slightly overcast during the red and green filtered frames of this trichrome, but the sun broke through just before the blue filtered frame. Instead of trying to recalculate the exposure to compensate, I just carried on to see what might come out. Looks kinda like... Lomochrome Purple?Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes. Three individual black and white frames shot through Tiffen #25 Red, #58 Green, and #47 Blue filters, respectively, then combined using GIMP to create a trichrome color image.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53446005299_3b76387209_b.jpg
2023.04.13 Roll #330-08063-positive-trichrome.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Well, it wasn't cactus I ate, but you're on the right track
Jan 08, 2024 at 11:34 PM
p.1125 #12Post your recent film shots!
Tried to eke out one last frame on the roll, but didn't quite make it. So it goes...
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2023.04.14 Roll #331-08035-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2023.04.14 Roll #331-08035-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Jan 09, 2024 at 12:10 AM
p.1125 #13Post your recent film shots!
OregonSun wrote:
Ultramax
Okaya Optics Lord IIA
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53451514322_0790d16d37_o.jpg
Gorgeous greens!
Ultramax
Okaya Optics Lord IIA
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53451514322_0790d16d37_o.jpg
Gorgeous greens!
Jan 09, 2024 at 12:54 AM
p.1125 #14Post your recent film shots!
More Polaroid Lab shots of old digital photos. These were printed on i-Type B&W Polaroid film.
Steeplechasers by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Delighted dancer by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Steeplechasers by Brad Hurley, on FlickrDelighted dancer by Brad Hurley, on FlickrJan 09, 2024 at 08:53 AM
p.1125 #15Post your recent film shots!
I actually quite like this one with the development challenges-
Cinestill 800T
Leica MA
35 APO
Cinestill 800T
Leica MA
35 APO
 |
||
 |
||
|
Jan 09, 2024 at 09:37 AM
p.1125 #16Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
More Polaroid Lab shots of old digital photos. These were printed on i-Type B&W Polaroid film.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53453353193_b312b641fc_c.jpgSteeplechasers by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53453644895_025bb7c799_c.jpgDelighted dancer by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
This whole series - not just the ones above - are so good. And it really shows you how the image is so much more important than sharpness, 'perfect' colour/contrast, DR etc
More Polaroid Lab shots of old digital photos. These were printed on i-Type B&W Polaroid film.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53453353193_b312b641fc_c.jpgSteeplechasers by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53453644895_025bb7c799_c.jpgDelighted dancer by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
This whole series - not just the ones above - are so good. And it really shows you how the image is so much more important than sharpness, 'perfect' colour/contrast, DR etc
Jan 09, 2024 at 10:59 AM
p.1125 #17Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
This whole series - not just the ones above - are so good. And it really shows you how the image is so much more important than sharpness, 'perfect' colour/contrast, DR etc
Thanks! I like 'em although it's all a bit schizophrenic as I'm waiting for my first medium-format photos to come back from the lab and those will be kind of the polar opposite of these. I like it all...low-res, high-res, whatever.
What I like about the Polaroid Instant Lab printer is that I can get everything right before firing off a Polaroid, unlike with a real Polaroid camera. On the one hand that eliminates one of the most enjoyable aspects of Polaroid (its unpredictability) but it saves a lot of money as Polaroid film runs about $2 (Canadian) per photo. I did have a few failures, mainly underexposures, but not as many as if I'd been shooting direct to Polaroid. And there's still an element of surprise because all of these Polaroids look quite different from the original photos.
This whole series - not just the ones above - are so good. And it really shows you how the image is so much more important than sharpness, 'perfect' colour/contrast, DR etc
Thanks! I like 'em although it's all a bit schizophrenic as I'm waiting for my first medium-format photos to come back from the lab and those will be kind of the polar opposite of these. I like it all...low-res, high-res, whatever.
What I like about the Polaroid Instant Lab printer is that I can get everything right before firing off a Polaroid, unlike with a real Polaroid camera. On the one hand that eliminates one of the most enjoyable aspects of Polaroid (its unpredictability) but it saves a lot of money as Polaroid film runs about $2 (Canadian) per photo. I did have a few failures, mainly underexposures, but not as many as if I'd been shooting direct to Polaroid. And there's still an element of surprise because all of these Polaroids look quite different from the original photos.
Jan 09, 2024 at 12:18 PM
p.1125 #19Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
FM2n, 55 2.8, HP5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53453233472_8359d090b4_c.jpg
Very cool!
FM2n, 55 2.8, HP5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53453233472_8359d090b4_c.jpg
Very cool!
Jan 09, 2024 at 06:21 PM
p.1125 #20Post your recent film shots!
Better than a picture of my feet. MP + Portra 800.
Jan 09, 2024 at 06:22 PM