Rodolfo Paiz
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
|
 p.713 #1 · Mustang Air to Air: The Sequel | |
Shaun Nyc wrote:
They could have left the elected Russian friendly government in place instead of directly funding the overthrow of it in 2014 and installing a western friendly TV personality. This all happened under VP Brandon and here we are with part 2. The energy/food starvation of America. You have to burn it all down to "build back better" right ?
I'm sorry to the regular posters here with this kind of response but I'm sick & tired of being lectured with TV talking points and propaganda.
Lectured? Hey, no one's calling you Grasshopper... 
Look, I'm not advocating for or against Republicans, Democrats, or Trumpists. I'm not for or against any "side". I'm trying to discuss ideas and facts so that we can agree on things. If y'all can't agree on FACTS, then well, you have a serious problem, don't you? As I said before, debate is crucial to the health of the republic.
So don't get pissed at me. If you disagree with me, or you think I'm mistaken, just say so and tell me why I should change my mind. I'm perfectly happy to be convinced, I just don't subscribe to ANY theories that are devoid of support and are accepted because anyone's Trusted Talking Head #1 or #2 says so.
So about your first paragraph:
The U.S. government has been meddling with other nations' government for decades if not centuries. They engineered the coup in Guatemala that overthrew Arbenz in 1944. The current maniacs in Iran are there because the U.S. put them there via the coup that overthrew the Shah, too. Other examples exist. So sure: though I don't see data to indicate that the U.S. did intervene, it could have happened. So let's assume it did and go with your argument.
What I'd like to know is, how do you draw a line between that and the assumption that such an intervention represented a DELIBERATE action to create a crisis back in the USA? You're claiming they predicted and even influenced world affairs in advance, with that kind of impact and precision... and nearly a decade in advance, no less. And you're claiming that the "energy/food starvation of America" was planned by one political party "to burn it all down" for their own gain. Am I understanding your point correctly?
If so, how does your "explanation" account for the fact that the energy problems, supply chain crises, high inflation, food crisis, and so on that you're attributing to the Evil Dems are a GLOBAL problem right now? Each and every one of those problems is wreaking havoc in essentially EVERY country on Earth right now. Europe, Asia, Latin America, Africa... we've ALL got these same problems, at the same time. Everyone else agrees on why they're happening. So what makes you think it's a USA conflict between one group and another?
Note that I'm not making any arguments here. I don't understand yours, and I'm explaining why I'd like more detail, and data, and explanation. Would you care to support that theory a little more, please?
|
, but I picked up the Mavic 3 Pro this morning and have been charging all of the components. Next step is to customize the parameters and go fly a little. Much as I love the Inspire 2 X5S, I'm looking forward to some spontaneity and not feeling like I'm hauling NASA around with me when a drone assignment arises.
