RikWriter wrote:
They weren't worth 2 cents, actually. You'd have been better off keeping them to yourself until you came up with a thought worth sharing.
My comment was based on what inages I've seen so far in the thread. My 2 cents are just as important as yours, except mine wasn't a personal attack. Have a nice day lose_
Yes, I do think that a 4 x 5" film and scan would make a significant difference!
Having said that, a lot comes down to good resolution and the quality of the sensor and lens used; the photographer's skill and technique i.e. the quality of the originals; AND the photographer's post-processing skills! A $1,000 DSLR in the hands of a highly skilled photographer will get you better images than a 4 x 5" camera in the hands of a less skilled photographer.
bouch wrote:
Mamiya - If all these images had been shot on 4x5, scanned and reproduced at web size do you think they would look dramatically different?
Some really nice stuff here. It's nice to see everybody putting their 5Ds to such good use. Here're some of my faves. I haven't actually had much of a chance to use it
