fredmiranda.com
Login

Archive 2005 · Your Best 5D shots...

  
 
Memphis
Offline
Details
p.3 #1Your Best 5D shots...
Thanks Rich
Dec 15, 2005 at 10:30 PM
CurtPick
Offline
Details
p.3 #2Your Best 5D shots...
Damn you all I say !

Stop it ! Stop it !

Seriously everyone.
I am impressed !

Note to self :

Self, the wife will kill you ... the wife will kill you... the wife will kill you !!!!!!!!!
Dec 15, 2005 at 10:51 PM
Jim Victory
Offline
Details
p.3 #3Your Best 5D shots...
mamiya wrote:
Nice photos.

But I know some others are thinking the same thing. Most of these could have been taken with any $1000 digital slr. My 2 cents.



The same thing could be said about the 1DsMKII

Jim
Dec 16, 2005 at 12:09 AM
RikWriter
Offline
Details
p.3 #4Your Best 5D shots...
mamiya wrote:
Nice photos.

But I know some others are thinking the same thing. Most of these could have been taken with any $1000 digital slr. My 2 cents.



They weren't worth 2 cents, actually. You'd have been better off keeping them to yourself until you came up with a thought worth sharing.
Dec 16, 2005 at 06:13 AM
franzdom
Offline
Details
Dec 16, 2005 at 06:40 AM
ximagination
Offline
Details
p.3 #6Your Best 5D shots...
Here's mine..Shot in Bali, Indonesia.. Straight from the camera.

http://www.dphotojournal.com/morning.jpg


If u want to see 100% crop and EXIF of this shot u can go to:
http://www.dphotojournal.com/canon-ef-70-200mm-f28l/
Dec 16, 2005 at 06:54 AM
carles
Offline
Details
p.3 #7Your Best 5D shots...
In Ordesa - Monte Perdido NP, Spain. With the 17-40 f/4, ND grad filter and Landscape Picture Style (I love this one)

http://homepage.mac.com/carleszamorano/imatges/bujaruelo_web/ordesa1.jpg
Dec 16, 2005 at 07:28 AM
ward1066
Offline
Details
p.3 #8Your Best 5D shots...
very nice shot Carles!
Dec 16, 2005 at 07:32 AM
weinschela
Offline
Details
p.3 #9Your Best 5D shots...
Central Park zoo (NY). 70-300 DO
Dec 16, 2005 at 07:44 AM
Melanie Kipp
Offline
Details
p.3 #10Your Best 5D shots...
Alan Weinschel
You might want to resize your image... it's too big.
Dec 16, 2005 at 08:35 AM
weinschela
Offline
Details
p.3 #11Your Best 5D shots...
Yes, sorry about that. Its my first upload. I will try again later.
Dec 16, 2005 at 09:41 AM
mamiya
Offline
[X]
Details
p.3 #12Your Best 5D shots...
RikWriter wrote:
mamiya wroteNice photos.

But I know some others are thinking the same thing. Most of these could have been taken with any $1000 digital slr. My 2 cents.
They weren't worth 2 cents, actually. You'd have been better off keeping them to yourself until you came up with a thought worth sharing.




My comment was based on what inages I've seen so far in the thread. My 2 cents are just as important as yours, except mine wasn't a personal attack. Have a nice day lose_
Dec 16, 2005 at 10:16 AM
bouch
Offline
Details
p.3 #13Your Best 5D shots...
mamiya wrote:
Nice photos.

But I know some others are thinking the same thing. Most of these could have been taken with any $1000 digital slr. My 2 cents.


Mamiya - If all these images had been shot on 4x5, scanned and reproduced at web size do you think they would look dramatically different?
Dec 16, 2005 at 10:22 AM
weinschela
Offline
Details
p.3 #14Your Best 5D shots...
Here's the (hopefully) resized polar bear

Dec 16, 2005 at 10:35 AM
Flappie
Offline
Details
p.3 #15Your Best 5D shots...
Peter,

these are truly great shots, fantastic composition

Flp

petermendelson wrote:
Here's a couple I liked:

http://peterm1.smugmug.com/photos/42938950-L.jpg

http://peterm1.smugmug.com/photos/42938935-L.jpg

http://peterm1.smugmug.com/photos/46500472-L.jpg

Peter

Dec 16, 2005 at 12:32 PM
bobbytan
Offline
Details
p.3 #16Your Best 5D shots...
Yes, I do think that a 4 x 5" film and scan would make a significant difference!

Having said that, a lot comes down to good resolution and the quality of the sensor and lens used; the photographer's skill and technique i.e. the quality of the originals; AND the photographer's post-processing skills! A $1,000 DSLR in the hands of a highly skilled photographer will get you better images than a 4 x 5" camera in the hands of a less skilled photographer.



bouch wrote:
mamiya wroteNice photos.

But I know some others are thinking the same thing. Most of these could have been taken with any $1000 digital slr. My 2 cents.
Mamiya - If all these images had been shot on 4x5, scanned and reproduced at web size do you think they would look dramatically different?

Dec 16, 2005 at 12:43 PM
akclimber
Offline
Details
p.3 #17Your Best 5D shots...
Dec 16, 2005 at 12:47 PM
JPrimgaard
Offline
Details
p.3 #18Your Best 5D shots...
Joe, the last shot (eagle) is awsome!!!

Will look great at about 2'x3' on the wall. Nice to know you have the resoluton to do it with!
Dec 16, 2005 at 01:05 PM
CurtPick
Offline
Details
p.3 #19Your Best 5D shots...
All very good guys but isn't anyone seeing the light fall of on the corners of a few of these ? Or is it vigentting ?

I know , I know, its the lens not the camera !!
Dec 16, 2005 at 01:12 PM
FM ForumsCanon ForumJoin Upload & Sell
  
 

You are not logged inLog inRegister

Switch to mobile view