Now that I’ve had the chance to use this little gem for a few initial shots, I felt it deserved its own dedicated image thread.
Sony has really created a delightful lens in a compact package. I find the image quality impressive. Sometimes I do think, "Hmm, 70mm would be nice right about now," but that thought vanishes quickly when I consider the weight and size of 24-70mm f/2.8 lenses. It really fits the Sony A7V like a glove.
Perhaps a nice little collection of images taken with this lens will emerge here.
I own both the Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II and the newer FE 24-50mm f/2.8 G and I agree that the reduced size and weight of the 24-50mm is a great find. I now use it on either my A7CR/A7CII or even my A7V bodies. The GM II is getting most of its use on either my A1 or A1 II where the extra weight is balanced with the battery grips I use on those bodies. Have to admit I was considering the FE 20-70mm f/4 but I don’t find the smaller zoom range an issue. Also bought its sister lens the FE 16-25mm f/2.8 G. Have tried that?
swldstn wrote:
Also bought its sister lens the FE 16-25mm f/2.8 G. Have tried that?
Interesting point! I was thinking about which lens I could add below the focal length range of the 24-50. Wanted to do some research soon. Maybe you saved me some time
I added the Sony 16-35 PZ f4.0 to my 24-50. It's light enough for the A7CR and gives me selectivity of how wide-angle I want to go, which I find useful. Although the focal range overlaps the 24-50 I like that there is 35mm available if I see a 'normal' subject and don't have time to change lenses before capturing it.
I'll add a few. I just sold my 20-70 for the 24-50, as my 25-200 has filled the role of my 20-70. The range is limited but I like the images a lot more than the 20-70.
cxpics wrote:
I'll add a few. I just sold my 20-70 for the 24-50, as my 25-200 has filled the role of my 20-70. The range is limited but I like the images a lot more than the 20-70.
zeitlos wrote:
@cxpix: May I ask what do you use the 24-50 2.8 for? What the 25-200? Do you carry them together or just either one depending on your trip etc.?
The 24-50 has now slotted into my 3 lens kit of 16G, 24-50, 50-400. This gets used when weight is not a big concern for me. I do a lot of biking and backpacking and the 25-200 is when I need something light with telephoto range and no lens changes.
The 20-70 while great, always produced fairly flat images of my family/friends. It would go on the camera for hikes but beyond that I didn’t enjoy shooting it. The 24-50 range is a bit limiting but it serves its purpose in being light but still giving that 2.8 aperture pop. The images coming out of it feels more like from GM glass where they don’t need as much post processing.
cxpics wrote: zeitlos wrote@cxpix: May I ask what do you use the 24-50 2.8 for? What the 25-200? Do you carry them together or just either one depending on your trip etc.?The 24-50 has now slotted into my 3 lens kit of 16G, 24-50, 50-400. This gets used when weight is not a big concern for me. I do a lot of biking and backpacking and the 25-200 is when I need something light with telephoto range and no lens changes.
The 20-70 while great, always produced fairly flat images of my family/friends. It would go on the camera for hikes but beyond that I didn’t enjoy shooting it. The 24-50 range is a bit limiting but it serves its purpose in being light but still giving that 2.8 aperture pop. The images coming out of it feels more like from GM glass where they don’t need as much post processing.
Thank you! I also had the 20-70 for a short period of time but never really like it for the exact reasons you mentioned. The 24-50mm got me from the very beginning despite its (focal length) limitations.
Views of Reno City Hall From a recent walk around downtown. These images were all processed using Cobalt's Kodachrome 25b emulation. I've shot the flag before, but they just mounted a new flag and I like how the colors pop.