That's basically what the R6II does. I agree, for FSI non-stacked, it's fast. Faster than Sony's BSI in this category. While I use the R6II in e-shutter to cover sports, it's only usable and not ideal. Rolling shutter can become an issue whereas even the relatively slow R5II's stacked sensor generally has been no problem..
If this sensor doesn't take a noticeably DR hit in e-shutter, then at least it would be moving in the right direction.
I can't wait for this camera to materialize with full specs. I've been using an R6 since 2020. The video overheating is a real PITA sometimes. If the Mk3 is a big upgrade from the Mk2, I'll consider it. If not, I'll push Mk2 prices down and I'll get one of those.
The user requirements would include the readout speed and DR per ISO.
The functional requirements would include the need for front-side, back-ass, sideways, and or stackable sensors.
As the consumer, all I can do is map the available camera specs with my personal URS.
Whether the readout speeds are relatively good for the level of technology used, doesn't really help me. Like many Canon products, it will be just good enough for the intended market.
It seems like the R6 III, much like the upcoming Sony a7V - both probably a bit delayed at this point according to most expectations/hopes - will be incremental upgrades. 32mp over 24 is a welcome upgrade, but Sony a7IV has had 33mp for years, albeit it is a slow-readout sensor with pretty aweful rolling shutter. I guess we can expect some type of pre-capture and probably 4K60 uncropped for both the Canon and Sony. I had hoped that Sony would update the body to the pro-line design of the a1 II & a9 III, but all indications says no it will still be the same squarish semi-uncomfortable a7 design.
I'm sure the Mk III will be an excellent camera, top-notch AF speed and accuracy. The biggest guess is where they will put the on/off switch this time? :-)
