p.36 #2 · Nature and Wildlife image thread - a Sequel
Photo dump of A1/600GM reddish shots from Saturday. Missed a bunch more because I was too slow, clipped wings when it got too close, or a pesky snowy egret walked in front at a critical moment.
p.36 #3 · Nature and Wildlife image thread - a Sequel
TGPhotography wrote:
Photo dump of A1/600GM reddish shots from Saturday. Missed a bunch more because I was too slow, clipped wings when it got too close, or a pesky snowy egret walked in front at a critical moment.
p.36 #18 · Nature and Wildlife image thread - a Sequel
duncangr wrote:
Nice - but when are you going to start posting full res images ??
These downsampled images look ordinary on my screen so I just have to image how good they actually are ?
Just go to my Flickr page and click on View All Sizes. You will see close to the original size depending on how big the crop is. I think it maxes out the viewable size to 6K. But most of my crops are so deep the original won't be over 6K all that often.
I don't see how one would post full res on FM. FM upload feature is ancient and limits file size considerably.
p.36 #20 · Nature and Wildlife image thread - a Sequel
nmerc_photos wrote:
What's the best way to post full res on FM?
I'm on a 55" 4K monitor and his images look as good, if not better than yours - which should be full res, right?
Not surprising as your display pixel density is around 80ppi and mine is 218ppi - so yours is low resolution and would better suit viewing of low resolution images as it simply doesn't have the ability to display fine detail.
The typical high resolution display would have a pixel density of at least 150ppi. Retina displays typically are over 200 because at that pixel density and at normal viewing distances the eye is unable to discern the individual pixels, so for example text looks completely smooth.
. I think the results are worth it.
