fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              5              12       13       end
  

Archive 2024 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?

  
 
ilkka_nissila
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #1 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


I have to say I agree on this. I don't do much bird photography but photograph a lot of people, events (including some in very difficult light) and some sports (other mammals occasionally). I find in most circumstances the Z8 focuses correctly about 99% of my shots on average. There are situations where it does nearly 99.9% (typically with fast lenses) while if I am in dim light with a slow lens (that puts me in the ISO 12800-25600 territory) then it can fail to keep consistent focus. Subjects include weddings, people indoors at night, concerts, figure skating, outdoor events in good light, deer at dusk etc. I don't, however, typically shoot with auto-area AF (except for video at small apertures in daylight on a gimbal); instead, on MILC most of the time use a horizontal bar in custom wide area with subject detection. I customize the width and height of C1 for horizontal and C2 for vertical shots and set the width and height according to the requirements of the situation, so that there is enough compositional freedom for me to work with on a fast-moving subject but not more than needed, i.e. I do not use any area that is larger than necessary. This does the job for me and it works well in situations where there can be multiple subjects in the frame. I stick to C1 and C2 and occasionally override to 9-point dynamic using a lens button.

I think the Nikon Z8 (and Z9 which should be similar) can produce excellent results with the right experience and settings. I don't have any interest in brand hopping as I think it would be a huge waste or money to sell and buy stuff and then realize some things was better in the system you switched from.

What I am hoping for Nikon to implement is cross-type phase detection, this would improve the reliability of AF in situations where there are vertical lines such as grass in the background. However, even as it is I find the Nikon Z8 AF very good.

One thing that is good to be aware of is that although the subject detection box tends to dance around, the focus usually does not do that as much. I think the subject-detection algorithm probably runs on its own thread or process and the marker in the viewfinder follows the latest detected subject. The autofocus, however, follows this information with a delay and usually uses phase-detection points near the detected subject which may not be exactly at the same point, which can explain the inconsistency between actual focus and subject detection box. To improve this consistency, I think Nikon might need to go with dual-pixel AF to increase the number of phase-detection areas so that subject detection always happens at the same pixels as the phase-detection AF. However, it's not clear whether Nikon wants to go with this approach in the future. Dual pixel AF requires twice as many photosites in the sensor than are recorded in the image, which increases the computational burden and may lead to less optimal sensor characteristics and more heat generation than in their current system. Both have their own advantages and disadvantages.

RoamingScott wrote:
Most people don’t like hearing “skill issue”. Unfortunately for them, 99% of the time it is.




Nov 17, 2024 at 02:05 PM
cohenfive
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #2 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


In all seriousness, here's one of a pintail courtship flight...A group of males with one and only one female, trying to woo her into mating...these flights go on for quite a while in the fall/winter. As I mentioned, I was very pleased with how the Z8 af performed.







Nov 17, 2024 at 04:01 PM
tester_V
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #3 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


The point of this topic is not a skills of a photographer or bashing the Nikon. I do not own Nikon or A1 but I shot it. Nikon Z8/9 is a great camera and it could enable a person to take a great shot/shots. But it is not as good as it could be or as good as the other brands. It is getting there, I just wish it will be great now. That is it, we all LOVE NIKON, but still, it needs to get better...



Nov 17, 2024 at 05:07 PM
tabishshaikh
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #4 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


tester_V wrote:
The point of this topic is not a skills of a photographer or bashing the Nikon. I do not own Nikon or A1 but I shot it. Nikon Z8/9 is a great camera and it could enable a person to take a great shot/shots. But it is not as good as it could be or as good as the other brands. It is getting there, I just wish it will be great now. That is it, we all LOVE NIKON, but still, it needs to get better...


Again this statement is very subjective. We have this...but we want that...
As a Nikon user, surely there are enhancements we all want, but if you are unable to take pictures with the technology we have today, then most of the limitations are with you.



Nov 17, 2024 at 11:04 PM
tester_V
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #5 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


tabishshaikh wrote:
Again this statement is very subjective. We have this...but we want that...
As a Nikon user, surely there are enhancements we all want, but if you are unable to take pictures with the technology we have today, then most of the limitations are with you.


Of course it is subjective! Do you think I am a robot? And yes, the today technologies demonstrated by the number of camera makers, allowing a photographer to do his/her job quicker and better and so on... Nikon have the technology but it is not as refined as the other (in AF) companies. Stop constipating, nobody is trashing "greatness" of Nikon. They just have to do better job.



Nov 17, 2024 at 11:34 PM
armd
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #6 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


gannis wrote:
This is all with the Z9. I do agree, with subject detect on, it is a hit or miss with BIF. With Subject detect off, the Wide AF behaves almost like Group AF mode on the DSLRs. I have seen your posts before and have always wondered what was causing this, especially when the bird isn’t filling the frame. FWIW, I use Wide L with subject detect off, lock-on settings at 3, subject motion set to steady (I don’t use erratic as i feel it makes the AF way too sensitive).



Haven't been able to make it to Conowingo (yet) though I did have the opportunity to shoot PasserinesIF today. Was experimenting on a cooperative Woodpecker who was flying back and forth. With SD on, epic fail. SD off with Wide L significant success. Perhaps the SD algorithms for birds is so taxing on the AF system that it simply can't track well with it on? In some ways, the Z8's SD for BIF reminds me of the Canon R7. I am curious to hear whether folks shut the Z8/Z9 SD off for Osprey/Eagle strikes?



Nov 18, 2024 at 08:28 PM
groob
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #7 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


In my experience AA works great for BiF, including in front of varied backgrounds. The teal is one of 20+ photos in a row that were all in focus and which began when the teal were very small in the frame. The teal were the same color as the background, and I purposefully underexposed to avoid blowing the whites on its shoulder. The mallard is 100% full frame, uncropped.


_LWG7115 copy


_LWG7327 copy 2



Nov 18, 2024 at 10:08 PM
gannis
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #8 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


For birds that have unpredictable flight path or diving raptors, i always turn off subject detection and that has worked for me and i use Wide-L. For water birds/ raptors flying or gliding, I start with Wide-L with subject detection on and then switch to Auto Area AF if eye tracking is precise.

armd wrote:
Haven't been able to make it to Conowingo (yet) though I did have the opportunity to shoot PasserinesIF today. Was experimenting on a cooperative Woodpecker who was flying back and forth. With SD on, epic fail. SD off with Wide L significant success. Perhaps the SD algorithms for birds is so taxing on the AF system that it simply can't track well with it on? In some ways, the Z8's SD for BIF reminds me of the Canon R7. I am curious to hear whether folks shut the Z8/Z9 SD off for Osprey/Eagle strikes?





Nov 19, 2024 at 05:33 AM
cohenfive
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #9 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


It sounds like I should try turning subject detection to 'off' and using wide-l more. I've used wide-l a bit, but always with subject detection on. While I haven't experienced big issues, I am always looking to optimize how the camera tracks fast moving wildlife. In the meantime, maybe we'll get lucky when nikon drops a new firmware for the z9/8 that makes things even better than they are...


Nov 19, 2024 at 10:28 AM
reggieb
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #10 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


groob wrote

I have no idea how a camera could be materially better at shooting perched birds than a Z9. I’m not sure I have a single out of focus photo of a perched bird with the Z9, or even a woodpecker moving all around a tree. And again, the Z9 will pick out a tiny bird on a stick in a busy woodland setting at ~40 yards. If you want more than that, I’d suggest changing your shooting style.


Just last weekend, I shot some woodpeckers, egrets, and a great blue heron with my Z8 and a couple herons and egrets with a Panasonic G9II.

I just find that interesting, because you mention woodpeckers specifically, including one that was going around the tree - and I just had that exact subject yesterday. The Z8 nailed that scenario no problem at all. With the 85mm f1.2 no less (I wasn't planning to go birding, I was on a walk with my daughter when we spotted them).

As others have mentioned, it's long-necked birds that the Z8/9 have trouble with. The blue heron was behind my house in the pond, so I went and got a tripod and everything. The Z8 absolutely refused to focus on the heron in any subject detection mode. It would occasionally find it, but the box would jump all over the bird and remain focused on the grass in front of it 75% of the time and would never stay on the bird. Because of the tripod, I just switched out of subject detection, put a single point on its head, and nailed focus that way. The heron was around half of the frame at this point, because it was behind a berm, had it been out from behind that, it would have been probably 75-80% of the frame. But that is the exact scenario those cameras perform worst with, a partially obscured, long necked bird.

The G9II later that day, with a little snowy egret filling maybe 25% of the frame, nailed focus on it through grass without any issue at all. That's a camera most folks would never think has a better AF system, and it truly doesn't, but its Achilles heel isn't the same, either.

It is what it is. At the end of the day, I got focus. I don't have trouble with most BIF, or honestly, most situations. But the Z AF system has trouble with long-necked birds. This is a phenomenon that a lot of people have documented, including some of the great photographers in this thread. It's not anywhere in the remote ballpark of a deal-breaker, but it's not a made up issue, either. That said, I got the same birds all day long with my D3s, with my D500, and I can just use other autofocus modes on those birds. I was mostly just testing a ton of scenarios because I had a blue heron, and later a great egret, in the pond right behind my house, giving me a lot of time to just muck about.



Nov 19, 2024 at 11:42 AM
gannis
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #11 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


Wide-L, even with subject detection on works well for the most part. But in case of challenging subjects like diving birds etc, it’s best to turn it off. Where i find the Wide L problematic is with really small, erratic flying birds like swallows against busy backgrounds. Firstly, it is very difficult to keep the tiny bird inside the Wide-L box. Now, the moment I try to use C1 with a bigger sized box, the AF struggles and more often than not focuses on the background. So the best way to get precise AF is to keep the Wide AF box as small as possible (Wide L being optimal) and turn off SD but then this method doesn’t work well for swallows etc.

cohenfive wrote:
It sounds like I should try turning subject detection to 'off' and using wide-l more. I've used wide-l a bit, but always with subject detection on. While I haven't experienced big issues, I am always looking to optimize how the camera tracks fast moving wildlife. In the meantime, maybe we'll get lucky when nikon drops a new firmware for the z9/8 that makes things even better than they are...





Nov 19, 2024 at 11:48 AM
JustShootMe
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #12 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


reggieb wrote:
Just last weekend, I shot some woodpeckers, egrets, and a great blue heron with my Z8 and a couple herons and egrets with a Panasonic G9II.

I just find that interesting, because you mention woodpeckers specifically, including one that was going around the tree - and I just had that exact subject yesterday. The Z8 nailed that scenario no problem at all. With the 85mm f1.2 no less (I wasn't planning to go birding, I was on a walk with my daughter when we spotted them).

As others have mentioned, it's long-necked birds that the Z8/9 have trouble with. The blue
...Show more

I shoot Herons/ Egrets all the time with Auto Area, and bird detection.. once in a while it will freak out if the background is to crazy, but not often. Maybe distance to the subject matters, these are all uncropped photos.




  NIKON Z 8    NIKKOR Z 600mm f/6.3 VR S lens    600mm    f/6.3    1/1000s    560 ISO    -0.3 EV  






  NIKON Z 8    VR 500mm f/4E lens    500mm    f/4.0    1/1600s    320 ISO    -0.3 EV  






  NIKON Z f    VR 500mm f/4E lens    500mm    f/4.0    1/2000s    1000 ISO    -0.3 EV  






  NIKON Z 8    NIKKOR Z 600mm f/6.3 VR S lens    600mm    f/6.3    1/2000s    280 ISO    -0.7 EV  






  NIKON Z 8    NIKKOR Z 600mm f/6.3 VR S lens    600mm    f/6.3    1/2000s    320 ISO    -0.7 EV  




Nov 19, 2024 at 12:35 PM
reggieb
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #13 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


JustShootMe wrote:
I shoot Herons/ Egrets all the time with Auto Area, and bird detection.. once in a while it will freak out if the background is to crazy, but not often. Maybe distance to the subject matters, these are all uncropped photos.


Nice shots!

None of those would be difficult scenarios except that first one. BUT, I actually think it's more grass in the foreground that causes issues. But I find that if it looks at me just like that first shot, it's probably going to grab the background most of the time, though it might jump back and forth and I'll probably get the shot. Which is why it's not a deal-breaker. But it's still the reality.



Nov 19, 2024 at 01:26 PM
RoamingScott
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #14 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


The problem as I’ve said many times, any upload to this site will never show if a photo has critical focus or not due to the low resolution. On a 5K monitor all of those look soft and out of focus, but it’s impossible to tell if they are or if it’s a byproduct of the upload.

JustShootMe wrote:
I shoot Herons/ Egrets all the time with Auto Area, and bird detection.. once in a while it will freak out if the background is to crazy, but not often. Maybe distance to the subject matters, these are all uncropped photos.




Nov 19, 2024 at 01:31 PM
JustShootMe
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #15 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


Yeah I gotta agree , if there are twigs/grass in front of the bird it can be tricky , but I think that's the same for all cameras. I try to avoid busy background, but it isn't always possible. I think most times I miss the shot, it's my fault not the camera. Random photos with stuff in the foreground.




  NIKON Z 8    NIKKOR Z 800mm f/6.3 VR S lens    800mm    f/6.3    1/400s    4500 ISO    0.0 EV  






  NIKON Z 8    NIKKOR Z 180-600mm f/5.6-6.3 VR lens    600mm    f/6.3    1/1000s    720 ISO    -0.3 EV  






  NIKON Z 8    NIKKOR Z 600mm f/6.3 VR S lens    600mm    f/6.3    1/1250s    640 ISO    -0.3 EV  






  NIKON Z 8    VR 500mm f/4E lens    700mm    f/5.6    1/1600s    900 ISO    0.0 EV  






  NIKON Z 8    NIKKOR Z 400mm f/4.5 VR S Z TC-1.4x lens    560mm    f/6.3    1/250s    180 ISO    0.0 EV  



Edited on Nov 19, 2024 at 02:17 PM · View previous versions



Nov 19, 2024 at 01:45 PM
JustShootMe
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #16 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


RoamingScott wrote:
The problem as I’ve said many times, any upload to this site will never show if a photo has critical focus or not due to the low resolution. On a 5K monitor all of those look soft and out of focus, but it’s impossible to tell if they are or if it’s a byproduct of the upload.



It is what it is, can't upload full res files, and I don't use any major sharpening after the fact, just Lightroom NR. It's sharp full screen on my studio display. That's all I can do.



Nov 19, 2024 at 01:48 PM
nmerc_photos
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #17 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


cohenfive wrote:
It sounds like I should try turning subject detection to 'off' and using wide-l more. I've used wide-l a bit, but always with subject detection on. While I haven't experienced big issues, I am always looking to optimize how the camera tracks fast moving wildlife. In the meantime, maybe we'll get lucky when nikon drops a new firmware for the z9/8 that makes things even better than they are...


I believe this has been my problem as well.

After reading through this thread, it seems the two best methods are Wide-L WITHOUT subject detect, and Auto Area WITH subject detect.

I had both of them backwards. Using Wide L with subject, and auto area without it.

In testing in the backyard at least, this "little" swap made a pretty significant difference.



Nov 19, 2024 at 02:44 PM
RoamingScott
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #18 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


nmerc_photos wrote:
I believe this has been my problem as well.

After reading through this thread, it seems the two best methods are Wide-L WITHOUT subject detect, and Auto Area WITH subject detect.

I had both of them backwards. Using Wide L with subject, and auto area without it.

In testing in the backyard at least, this "little" swap made a pretty significant difference.


Bonus points if you can get Area + Subject on shutter and Wide L w/o subject on AF-ON. Probably would need a recall button.



Nov 19, 2024 at 03:26 PM
RoamingScott
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #19 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?


So 80ish posts later, in a thread where OP concern-trolled about AF though having no issues AFing, other folks are realizing that the advice offered 1000 times on this forum is best practice.

See y'all again this same time next month



Nov 19, 2024 at 03:38 PM
PixiPhotography
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #20 · Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?



Just wait for the Z9 II coming next year. R1 is out, A1 II is out.. now we eagerly wait the Z9 II



Nov 19, 2024 at 04:08 PM
1       2       3              5              12       13       end




FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              5              12       13       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account