Home · Register · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3       4              6              19       20       end
  

Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review

  
 
highdesertmesa
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #1 · p.5 #1 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


Fred Miranda wrote:
Exactly. Despite its slower maximum aperture, the CV 50/3.5 APO provides subject isolation thanks to its smooth transition zone, exceptional performance, and aberration control.


This review is writing itself as you go along!



Aug 15, 2024 at 09:13 PM
Fred Miranda
Offline
Admin
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #2 · p.5 #2 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


highdesertmesa wrote:
This review is writing itself as you go along!


That's why I prefer writing reviews in this format. It allows me to take my time, really get to know the lens, and most importantly, gather valuable feedback from all of you!



Aug 15, 2024 at 10:10 PM
Plzenaak
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #3 · p.5 #3 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


Well, that fifty didn't convince me. Somehow I don't see the magic. For me, the most interesting 50mm Voigtlander lens so far is the Nokton 50mm f1.5. Too bad the shortest focusing distance is only 0.7m.


Aug 16, 2024 at 01:03 AM
philip_pj
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #4 · p.5 #4 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


Maybe post us an image or two from the 50/1.5 so we can see what the magic looks like? It's always more persuasive to show, don't tell, as they say. Otherwise it's just words from a stranger. Images we can share and view and inspect.


Aug 16, 2024 at 02:25 AM
Ripolini
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #5 · p.5 #5 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


Ripolini wrote:
... maximum magnification (Type II) attainable with VM/E, or VM/Z, "close focus" adapters by Voigtlander.


According to Cosina website, the minimum focus distance of the VM 50/3.5 Type II with 'close focus' adapters is around 28cm. This should correspond to about 0.30 X magnification*.

*: by using the thin lens approximation (internodal distance = 0, and constant focal length), i.e., the relationship: D = F(1/M + M +2), where D is the focusing distance, F the focal length and M the magnification.



Aug 16, 2024 at 03:59 AM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #6 · p.5 #6 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


Plzenaak wrote:
Well, that fifty didn't convince me. Somehow I don't see the magic. For me, the most interesting 50mm Voigtlander lens so far is the Nokton 50mm f1.5. Too bad the shortest focusing distance is only 0.7m.


The difference in MFD for the f/3.5 at 0.35m... could be a strong attractor. In some regard, that's like putting on a TC to get additional magnification, and the resulting reduction in light that comes along for the ride. The size / weight difference to the 50/2 APO are also an attractant for some folks.

Something (crude concept) like this:

50/2 APO + 2X = f/4 APO

That of course, is different from the 50/1.5 II Vintage, where the design is similar to the 75/1.5 Vintage. At the moment ... I'm probably leaning toward the Vintage (since I liked the rendering of the 75), but that mfd of 0.35m isn't something to readily dismiss, either.



Aug 16, 2024 at 04:34 AM
Plzenaak
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #7 · p.5 #7 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


You can only agree with that.


Aug 16, 2024 at 04:41 AM
rsolti13
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #8 · p.5 #8 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


Fred Miranda wrote:
That's why I prefer writing reviews in this format. It allows me to take my time, really get to know the lens, and most importantly, gather valuable feedback from all of you!


I was dead set on the f/2.2 but now this review has me wanting the 3.5. I wanted something compact and don't need speed (have the Lux) so was more focused on size/weight/rendering/sharpness. Fred, what is your preference between Type I and II with this lens? Is the aperture/focus ring being tied together much nuisance? I've never used a lens like that so hard for me to think about how it will impact normal workflow



Aug 16, 2024 at 07:45 AM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #9 · p.5 #9 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


Given the MFD / magnification of the 50/3.5 APO ... it begs the question of "if not" the 50/3.5 APO, then what (different focal lengths) other lens(s) might serve similar MFD duties, if someone went with the 2.0 APO, 2.2 or one of the Noktons for the 50mm?


Aug 16, 2024 at 08:42 AM
highdesertmesa
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #10 · p.5 #10 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


RustyBug wrote:
Given the MFD / magnification of the 50/3.5 APO ... it begs the question of "if not" the 50/3.5 APO, then what (different focal lengths) other lens(s) might serve similar MFD duties, if someone went with the 2.0 APO, 2.2 or one of the Noktons for the 50mm?


None of the other MFDs even come close. The Leica 35 APO-M and the Voigtlander 75 1.9 are the only two M lenses I can think of that might provide similar magnification without using a macro adapter.



Aug 16, 2024 at 09:10 AM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

Desmolicious
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #11 · p.5 #11 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


rsolti13 wrote:
I was dead set on the f/2.2 but now this review has me wanting the 3.5. I wanted something compact and don't need speed (have the Lux) so was more focused on size/weight/rendering/sharpness. Fred, what is your preference between Type I and II with this lens? Is the aperture/focus ring being tied together much nuisance? I've never used a lens like that so hard for me to think about how it will impact normal workflow


The 2.2 is way smaller than the 3.5 if you want compact.




Aug 16, 2024 at 10:02 AM
Fred Miranda
Offline
Admin
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #12 · p.5 #12 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


rsolti13 wrote:
I was dead set on the f/2.2 but now this review has me wanting the 3.5. I wanted something compact and don't need speed (have the Lux) so was more focused on size/weight/rendering/sharpness. Fred, what is your preference between Type I and II with this lens? Is the aperture/focus ring being tied together much nuisance? I've never used a lens like that so hard for me to think about how it will impact normal workflow


Despite having the same focal length, the Voigtlander 50mm f/2.2 and 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar offer different strengths. The 50mm f/2.2 is one of the smallest and lightest 50mm lenses for your Leica M, which is a camera that pairs well with smaller lenses for better ergonomics and rangefinder framelines.. While it does show noticeable vignetting when shot wide open,, it performs well across the board with no significant weaknesses, though aside from size, it doesn't excel in any particular area.

On the other hand, the Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar is a more specialized lens. It's not as compact but delivers the highest possible IQ for your Leica M. Although you might expect the Voigtlander 50mm f/2 APO-Lanthar to outperform it, my tests show their image quality is actually very similar. One area where the 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar truly shines is its MFD, allowing you to capture close-up shots that no other lens for the M-system can achieve, with image quality that holds up even at close distances. Another standout feature is its zero distortion, a rarity among 50mm lenses. This lens also benefits from its APO design, and because of its f/3.5 maximum aperture, chromatic aberration is non-existent. The only downside so far is the f/3.5 maximum aperture.

As for the Type II aperture and focus ring linkage, I find it bothersome during testing because I prefer to keep focus constant while changing the aperture for some tests. However, in real-world shooting, it's not an issue for me since I typically set exposure with ISO, aperture, and shutter speed first, and then focus afterward. It might take some getting used to if you haven't worked with a lens like this before.The now-discontinued Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 Heliar also combined the aperture and focus in the same ring.



Aug 16, 2024 at 10:31 AM
rsolti13
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #13 · p.5 #13 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


so I NEED both lol. Thanks


Aug 16, 2024 at 01:00 PM
Desmolicious
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #14 · p.5 #14 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


rsolti13 wrote:
so I NEED both lol. Thanks


And also make sure you pick up a film M, as the 50 2.2 does not vignette on film!



Aug 16, 2024 at 01:21 PM
itai195
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #15 · p.5 #15 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


This lens looks great. I already have the 50 f/2 but if I was buying one now I’d probably go with the new one for size.


Aug 16, 2024 at 02:07 PM
Fred Miranda
Offline
Admin
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #16 · p.5 #16 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


Update: I’ve confirmed that I’ll be receiving a Leica M11 loan from Leica in a few days. This will give me the chance to compare both Voigtlander 50mm APO-Lanthar lenses on the 61MP sensor. I’m also interested in seeing if the latest firmware has improved the stability of the M11 series, as I encountered several freezes with earlier versions.


Aug 16, 2024 at 02:15 PM
rsolti13
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #17 · p.5 #17 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


Desmolicious wrote:
And also make sure you pick up a film M, as the 50 2.2 does not vignette on film!


check....got a first batch MP with M6 dial. Holy cow do I love it.









Aug 16, 2024 at 03:24 PM
rsolti13
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #18 · p.5 #18 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


Fred Miranda wrote:
Update: I’ve confirmed that I’ll be receiving a Leica M11 loan from Leica in a few days. This will give me the chance to compare both Voigtlander 50mm APO-Lanthar lenses on the 61MP sensor. I’m also interested in seeing if the latest firmware has improved the stability of the M11 series, as I encountered several freezes with earlier versions.


You of all people....don't see how you don't get an M11 after trying it right now. I loved my M10-R for multiple reasons, and was the best M I'd ever used. The M11 colors aren't anywhere near as good out of camera as the M10-R, but that can easily be fixed and the rendering/sharpness of the M11 files make you say wow when you open them in LR.



Aug 16, 2024 at 03:28 PM
Fred Miranda
Offline
Admin
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #19 · p.5 #19 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


rsolti13 wrote:
You of all people....don't see how you don't get an M11 after trying it right now. I loved my M10-R for multiple reasons, and was the best M I'd ever used. The M11 colors aren't anywhere near as good out of camera as the M10-R, but that can easily be fixed and the rendering/sharpness of the M11 files make you say wow when you open them in LR.


I have mixed feelings about the M11 for several reasons. Initially, I was concerned about camera stability, especially after trying several M11 cameras with issues, though that seems to be less of an issue now. While the colors are accurate, they’re almost too precise for my taste, and there’s that magenta tint in all the images, which I’m not a fan of. The open sensor attracts more dust, and I find the shutter action (closing, opening, closing, and opening for every shot ) quite irritating... The shutter noise when turning the camera on reminds me of the M10-R in LV mode, which I also don’t like. It’s unclear how these extra actions will affect the shutter’s longevity.

On the upside, the M11 offers around 20% higher linear resolution, though this is mainly noticeable in the center of the frame if you use the right shutter speeds and has a high performer lens. The improved battery life is another plus, but beyond that, there’s not much else that stands out to me, especially since I focus with the rangefinder, which hasn’t changed at all.

I'll give the M11 another shot with the latest firmware, and if it impresses me, I might consider trying the new M11-D. But honestly, I'm really satisfied with the M10-R at the moment.



Aug 16, 2024 at 03:45 PM
highdesertmesa
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.5 #20 · p.5 #20 · Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar Review


Fred Miranda wrote:
I have mixed feelings about the M11 for several reasons. Initially, I was concerned about camera stability, especially after trying several M11 cameras with issues, though that seems to be less of an issue now. While the colors are accurate, they’re almost too precise for my taste, and there’s that magenta tint in all the images, which I’m not a fan of. The open sensor attracts more dust, and I find the shutter action (closing, opening, closing, and opening for every shot ) quite irritating... The shutter noise when turning the camera on reminds me of the M10-R in
...Show more

You’ll probably like the electronic shutter + base ISO 64 for wide open shooting in bright daylight.

The M11 now has a menu option that closes the shutter when you change lenses or turn off the camera. I found stubborn dust spots a problem with the M10 cameras, the kind of dust that requires a wet cleaning versus a blower. On the M11, I found that everything that would get on the sensor could be blown off with a filtered bulb blower. Makes me wonder if they added a coating on the M11 cover glass to make it anti-static and/or hydrophobic, IDK.



Aug 16, 2024 at 03:53 PM
1       2       3       4              6              19       20       end






FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3       4              6              19       20       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username       Or Reset password



This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.