Nikon1960 Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #3 · p.1 #3 · Official Canon EOS R1 Images and Specifications | |
Tony5787 wrote:
I think this is it for me with Canon, to wait this long and see a flagship that’s this underwhelming is beyond disappointing. Three years after the R3 and we basically get what I would have expected from an R3 Mark II? I’m sure the AF is probably stellar but the R3 already was outstanding, any shots I’ve missed with that camera were not because of the AF system. If they were sticking with the same resolution I would have expected a significant increase in performance over the R3 and on paper this just isn’t that.
Totally agreed. How is this any better than a Sony A9 III which can shoot 120 FPS Uncompressed RAW and has pre-capture? Plus, it's just a stacked sensor and not even global shutter!
This should be called R3 Mark II at best!
I've shot with every single major Mirrorless body at this point, and I still can't understand why Canon is still bothering with 24.2 MP "flagships." As a wildlife photographer, 24.2 MP doesn't cut it against my A1 or Z9. The R3 already has outstanding AF, at this point I want to see MP increases much more than better AF when the starting point is 24.
Edited on Jul 17, 2024 at 05:12 AM · View previous versions
|