fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

       2       3       end
  

Archive 2024 · M11 and M11M

  
 
rji2goleez
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #1 · M11 and M11M


Hey FMers! I think there are a few of you who shoot both the M11 and M11M. I'm considering adding the M11M along with my M11. In January, I visited the Leica store in LA and briefly took a couple of in store shots and was greatly impressed. However, only recently has my interest peaked about picking one up. I've done some reading to understand the difference between shooting the M11 and converting to BW vs how the M11M works. But at the end of the day, while I like to understand the science, I'm always more about the resulting images.

So, for any of you that own both M11 and M11M, I would love to hear any thoughts/opinions on the M11M, your use cases, what you like, what you get vs conversion of M11 images and anything else. I know much of this is subjective. I may rent before I buy. I may just buy or maybe not. Thanks in advance.



Mar 22, 2024 at 08:09 AM
robsonj
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · M11 and M11M


from a science perspective, the M11 is using 14bits to store a red, green, blue colour value. The M11m is using 14bits to store a single tone value. As you can imagine, that leads to many more tone values, which is then reflected in what you see in the resulting image, often described as tonal range, falloff etc. The M11m also has no Bayer filter, thus an increase in resolution I'd say on par with medium format when I compare to my GFX.

If you are dedicated to the BW process, there is no better camera than a Leica Monochrom. If you are not dedicated, add an M11 in addition to the M11m



Mar 22, 2024 at 08:20 AM
airfrogusmc
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · M11 and M11M


I have 2 M 10s and an M 10 Mono. I had the original M 9 Mono for 9 years. RobsonJ siad it perfectly when he said "If you are dedicated to the BW process, there is no better camera than a Leica Monochrom."



Mar 22, 2024 at 08:50 AM
saxguy
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · M11 and M11M


robsonj wrote:
from a science perspective, the M11 is using 14bits to store a red, green, blue colour value. The M11m is using 14bits to store a single tone value. As you can imagine, that leads to many more tone values, which is then reflected in what you see in the resulting image, often described as tonal range, falloff etc. The M11m also has no Bayer filter, thus an increase in resolution I'd say on par with medium format when I compare to my GFX.

If you are dedicated to the BW process, there is no better camera than a Leica Monochrom. If
...Show more

The resolution thing is real - it can easily be seen when I was working with my Q2M files vs my standard Q2 files.

An "advantage" the M11 would have over the M11M is that you have the ability to adjust the color channels in post when converting to black and white, whereas with the dedicated monocrom model you would need to use color filters over your lens to get similar effects in your images.

Also, and don't count this out with either camera when shooting for black and white, using an APO lens can have a big impact on your black and white images. Getting the different color channels aligned on the sensor will result in more perceived sharpness and microcontrast.



Mar 22, 2024 at 08:58 AM
rji2goleez
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · M11 and M11M


Thanks for the input. I have liked the BW images I can 'create' in post coming from the M11. It seems that the resolution and low light capabilities of the M11M take things a step further. As far as dedicating myself to B&W, my new year's resolution is to increase my focus on B&W, hence the interest in the M11M. I could go the route of the Q2M but since I have an arsenal of M mount lenses, I probably prefer the M11M.


Mar 22, 2024 at 09:29 AM
airfrogusmc
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · M11 and M11M


One thing for me is not having different batteries/chargers for different cameras. One of the biggest things for many is working with a mono sensor is like putting B&W film in your camera. You are totally committed to B&W. There is no confusion of vision.

The M 10 Mono is crazy good in low light. 50,000 ISO is very usable. I can only imagine what the M11M is like in low light. Plus is you are like me and work a lot on the street, to have insanely clean files at 6400 ISO that allows me to shoot at high shutter speeds and still be able stop down to f/8 or f/11 in daylight is a big plus.



Mar 22, 2024 at 09:41 AM
RustyRus
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #7 · M11 and M11M


I own both-

I think it really boils down to if you want to dump 9k into a camera that in 90% of most circumstances you probably could have achieved with the M11 you already own.

High ISO shots the M11m is incomparable to the M11 and also the resolution is noticeably better if you really start digging into files at 200% and want the ability to print large or just look at your files.

Saying that I really prefer the workflow and using filters on the M11m to really needing to edit all of that in post- The M11m is so much fun to use and I enjoy shooting in Black and White only just like I do with film.

90% of the difference for me though is the haptics and workflow of the monochrome camera vs the benefits of it- Those differences are enough for me to want to own and use the camera. Maybe you or others will use the resolution or high ISO performance more than I do but thats my honest take. It’s a unique camera and a blast to use- Looking at some of my favorite images from it, could I have anchieved similar results with the M11? Probably-


I enjoyed the process more on the M11m though- Is that worth 9k? I say yes but others can form their own opinion. Hope this helps




  LEICA M11 Monochrom    Summilux-M 1:1.4/28 ASPH. lens    28mm    f/3.4    1/250s    64000 ISO    0.0 EV  






  LEICA M11 Monochrom    Apo-Summicron-M 1:2/90 ASPH. lens    90mm    f/9.5    1/1600s    125 ISO    0.0 EV  






  LEICA M11 Monochrom    Summilux-M 1:1.4/50 lens    50mm    f/1.4    1/500s    32000 ISO    0.0 EV  






  LEICA M11 Monochrom    Summilux-M 1:1.4/50 ASPH. lens    50mm    f/2.0    1/1000s    320 ISO    -0.7 EV  






  LEICA M11 Monochrom    Summilux-M 1:1.4/50 ASPH. lens    50mm    f/9.5    1/1000s    125 ISO    0.0 EV  






  LEICA M11 Monochrom    Apo-Summicron-M 1:2/50 ASPH. lens    50mm    f/2.0    1/250s    125 ISO    0.0 EV  






  LEICA M11 Monochrom    Apo-Summicron-M 1:2/50 ASPH. lens    50mm    f/4.0    1/200s    16000 ISO    0.0 EV  






  LEICA M11 Monochrom    Apo-Summicron-M 1:2/50 ASPH. lens    50mm    f/2.8    1/350s    125 ISO    0.0 EV  




Mar 22, 2024 at 10:11 AM
rji2goleez
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #8 · M11 and M11M


Kent, thanks for this and the examples. I can see myself really liking the high ISO capabilities, shooting at night stopped down. I like what you say about the workflow and the fun aspect of shooting B&W. I find myself setting a B&W profile in my M11 but it doesn't give me the wow I got when I tested an M11M in the Leica store.


Mar 22, 2024 at 10:19 AM
ocean2059
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #9 · M11 and M11M


I have used M9/M9M and M10R/M10M combinations but not M11/M11M yet. From my own experience, the IQ advantage of monochrome bodies are real in both resolution and dynamic range. One other advantage of using M monochrome bodies is that legacy M/LTM lenses are fully capable on them with many unique and interesting optical characters.


Mar 22, 2024 at 12:21 PM
Andrew CD
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #10 · M11 and M11M


Good discussion!

What @robsonj says about tonal range and resolution is quite correct, in my opinion. I had an M246 Monochrom for three years, before exchanging it for an M11. In no way do I regret having done so (I simply don’t feel that I have time to make good use of two M digital bodies) but, in the same breath, I would also say that I did (and do) greatly appreciate the discipline of shooting in B&W. Very much what @RustyRus says about the workflow and @airfrogusmc about the B&W process.

So I do sometimes shoot with the M11 with the intention of converting to B&W. I’ve attached a couple of examples here. Would I have been more pleased had these been taken with an M10M or M11M using filters? Perhaps a little. Could I have discerned much difference? Possibly not.

However …. It’s arguably even more satisfying to take a good B&W photograph using film. I have had an MP since just before I bought the M246 in 2019. Although I don’t use it that often, when I do, it is almost always with B&W film. Do scanned images from film have the same resolution or tonal qualities as the same shot would have had if taken with an M11M? Possibly not. But I don’t really care. The salient point, for me, is that I really enjoy using it, when I have time. I might, conceivably, be able to justify an M11M to myself if and when I have more time, perhaps in a couple of years but, for now, an MP is a great option for B&W. If film is something you would countenance, it might just be worth considering ….

By the way, @saxguy’s point about APO lenses is important. Some people seem to take the view that, with film, it doesn’t matter if the lens is a little less sharp or contrasty (although lower contrast can be good in some light conditions). I don’t think this; although it may sound counterintuitive, for film, I tend to use my sharpest lenses, such as the CV 50/2.0 APO and ZM 35/1.4 Distagon. (I realise that saxguy was making the point about B&W, not film, I’m simply saying that I think it applies just as well to B&W film.)

Andrew





  LEICA M11    uncoded lens lens    f/5.6    1/60s    200 ISO    -0.3 EV  






  LEICA M11    Voigtlander VM APO-LANTHAR 50mm F2 Aspherical lens    50mm    f/2.8    1/1500s    64 ISO    -1.7 EV  




Mar 22, 2024 at 12:33 PM
thrice
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · M11 and M11M


The 14 bits for tones makes me chuckle. No phones have 14 bit displays, no commercial PC monitors have 14 bit displays (LUT != Display bit depth) and no printers can reproduce 16384 shades of grey scale. How are you showing all them tones to people?

The sharpness, DR and finer noise argument is the only practical difference.



Mar 22, 2024 at 03:18 PM
Kasper6188
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · M11 and M11M


M11m / tta 35mm apo

Nice tones and cropping power

http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53603763142_aab631f9c6_o.jpg

http://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53604978609_09775a269a_o.jpg



Mar 22, 2024 at 06:56 PM
RustyRus
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #13 · M11 and M11M


rji2goleez wrote:
Kent, thanks for this and the examples. I can see myself really liking the high ISO capabilities, shooting at night stopped down. I like what you say about the workflow and the fun aspect of shooting B&W. I find myself setting a B&W profile in my M11 but it doesn't give me the wow I got when I tested an M11M in the Leica store.


Different Rusty from Kent

My guess is you would fall in love with the M11m as I did and most people that use one-

I tired to give an honest opinion and remove emotion from it- I love the camera though!



Mar 22, 2024 at 07:33 PM
highdesertmesa
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #14 · M11 and M11M


I've shot both and currently only have the M11M. When speaking about "tones", I find the way the M11 color sensor renders black and white conversions to be more appealing than the M11M (and the SL2-S b&w conversions even more appealing than the M11). The M11 b&w converted images feel alive to me because I can pull out much more varied and interesting contrasts by using the color sliders over a b&w filter at the time of capture.

Images I make with the M11M feel too somber to me, sometimes to the point of feeling morbid. It takes too much more work in post to make the M11M images feel like M11 b&w converted images. I'm sure some enjoy that challenge, and perhaps there is a sense of accomplishment in having processed the M11M files into something wonderful, which the images posted from the M11M here illustrate.

Strangely, I felt the opposite way when comparing the Q2 to the Q2M, because I much preferred the Q2M. The Q2M's tones right out of the gate in Capture One seemed to really jump out at me, and they responded so easily to post processing.



Mar 22, 2024 at 07:50 PM
stgrove
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #15 · M11 and M11M


I well understand HDM's comments above. I find when I use a red filter on the M11M (or earlier M M models -M9M, 246 and M10M) it brings out what I want with the capture rather than without this filter.
That said converting M11, Q3 and SL2S files allow me plenty of adjustments in C1 with sliders. This is frankly often easier than using an M11M camera, but not always.

I like high contrast subject matter and often in these situations I can make the M11M work well, but that is not always the case.

Lately converting Q3 files from a recent trip was so easy where I did not have reason to take an M, gave me such pleasure where rain and dust was present, not to mention spending less time focusing and exposing. I found the same using my SL2S. The Q3 files gave me very rich tones when converted.

So for me not all situations forgetting weather offer the best opportunity for Monochrom usage, but when I do and nail the scenes it gives great pleasure.



Mar 22, 2024 at 08:55 PM
tunisia
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #16 · M11 and M11M


i have always loved the process of working on my files and converting to B/W. I can easily get lost in the weeds. It's a cool process. Reminds me of developing B/W film years ago when that's all I shot. Way before digital.
But, I like the Leica M10M and M11M better. I love the way a file looks straight out of the camera. Probably could get closer on my only color camera, the GFX 100 II and maybe even surpass it. Maybe not. But the M10M was my first and only Leica for a bit and though I loved it I was sad to sell it for the cash. Yep, to get the M11M.
Love the ergo and feel and ease of use. Love the pics right out from it. So, much so, I am loathe to alter in PP.
Shooting in dim light, indoors and at night is my turf. The darker, the better. Guess I'm a bit morbid, but it's the way I see. For years, I've searched for a digital camera good enough in Low Light and with good High ISO performance and with a mono sensor. As far as I"m concerned both the M10M and M11M are it. Either one is the way to go, if you really can relate at a base level to B/W.
Oh, wish I could have afforded to keep the 10 as well, but the 11 is great and though not my first love is a beautiful addition to my work. I really wouldn't have it any other way.
Joe D



Mar 22, 2024 at 09:26 PM
flash
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #17 · M11 and M11M


thrice wrote:
The 14 bits for tones makes me chuckle. No phones have 14 bit displays, no commercial PC monitors have 14 bit displays (LUT != Display bit depth) and no printers can reproduce 16384 shades of grey scale. How are you showing all them tones to people?

The sharpness, DR and finer noise argument is the only practical difference.



It matters a whole bunch in post processing.

Gordon



Mar 22, 2024 at 10:09 PM
thrice
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #18 · M11 and M11M


It really doesn't.
In fact after interpolation you have each pixel represented by 3*14 bits coming from a Bayer sensor. You throw away *some* of that data converting to monochrome but arguably have more DR from bit-depth for post processing than you would with the monochrom.

The monochrom benefits from having much lower noise which gives you a more usable DR but that benefit is due to the lack of CFA and higher quantum efficiency, not due to 14 bits.

flash wrote:
It matters a whole bunch in post processing.

Gordon




Mar 22, 2024 at 11:59 PM
robsonj
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · M11 and M11M


Andrew CD wrote:
Good discussion!

What @robsonj@ says about tonal range and resolution is quite correct, in my opinion. I had an M246 Monochrom for three years, before exchanging it for an M11. In no way do I regret having done so (I simply don’t feel that I have time to make good use of two M digital bodies) but, in the same breath, I would also say that I did (and do) greatly appreciate the discipline of shooting in B&W. Very much what @RustyRus@ says about the workflow and @airfrogusmc@ about the B&W process.

So I do sometimes shoot with the M11 with
...Show more

That first image is exquisite!

One thing not mentioned with regard to post processing and contrast. The monochrom images are generally quite flat to start with, just like a good negative, you can use a on lens filter to address some of that at the time of shoot, but in Lightroom, just like you would do in a traditional darkroom, the dodge and burn tools are an excellent companion to the on lens filters, as are the masking tools.

My journey to the M11m was to own a Q2m, to sell it after not getting to grips with the post processing aspect, adobe then release their new masking tools in Lightroom, me repurchasing a Q2m and use for a couple of years, before upgrading to a used M11m to, as others have mentioned, streamline batteries, chargers, share lenses etc with my M11.

There are often nearly new M11m’s available on here for a good price (how I bought mine), as people quite often buy the idea of a monochrom, but don’t like living it.




Mar 23, 2024 at 07:04 AM
robsonj
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · M11 and M11M


thrice wrote:
The 14 bits for tones makes me chuckle. No phones have 14 bit displays, no commercial PC monitors have 14 bit displays (LUT != Display bit depth) and no printers can reproduce 16384 shades of grey scale. How are you showing all them tones to people?

The sharpness, DR and finer noise argument is the only practical difference.


It’s the same principle as why you’re better editing from a (14 or 16bit) raw file than a (8bit) jpeg file. My display can’t display the 16bit color raw’s from the gfx for example, but the improved color tonal transitions are visible.

So I’d have to disagree with your last statement based on my own experience.



Mar 23, 2024 at 07:28 AM
       2       3       end




FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

       2       3       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account