Bob Bogo wrote:
How do you like that Ultron on the ZF? Any smeared corners/field curvature?
(I've been trying to find some real-world users of that combo of lens and camera, but drawn a blank so far...)
For my purposes it’s great. Obvious heavy vignetting when shooting at wide apertures but stopped down not too much to complain about and easily fixed in post. I have other lenses for critical corner to corner optimal performance, but I’m more interested in character, personally. I haven’t really tested it for field curvature but I’d be happy to email you some files if you’d like, just dm me your email.
Actualy I think some Voigtländer gear pics are ok and adds to the experience, but you are the thread-starter if I recall correctly and if you dont want I'll not add my own
RoamingScott wrote:
I rejiggered my Flickr account settings and it broke half the embeds I've ever made. Those pics were WITH the lens.
I remember that one of those pictures (the last one ... "What MFD looks like in practice") showed the 28/2.8 on your Z9, and NOT taken with the 28/2.8. Is it correct?
You're not as clever as you think you are. I was asked specifically by another poster to conduct a test, and that's what I did. That you'd turn that into derision shows your colors, but whatever, that's you. I'm done with it.
For heavens sake, this isn't anything to fight about. Back on topic. Found a new (to me) village on my way home. Zf with Voitländer APO-Lanthar 35mm. ISO100, JPEGs
RoamingScott wrote:
You're not as clever as you think you are. I was asked specifically by another poster to conduct a test, and that's what I did. That you'd turn that into derision shows your colors, but whatever, that's you. I'm done with it.
You were asked to check how well the 28/2.8 performs at MFD; not to take a picture of the lens and show (qualitatively) the working distance.
Consequently, in the thread you started it's not forbidden to post lenses' pictures.
Take care.
