Hi everyone, I’m new to Nikon zf here. I don’t know if it’s my settings or what, but I found that when the monitor is flipped out, the eye sensor is not automatically disabled like on z6. So if I hold the camera too close to my body, it will auto switch to Evf. I have to use the monitor mode button to select for LCD only to stop the auto switching. Is it the normal behavior for Zf?
Chris Cheng wrote:
Hi everyone, I’m new to Nikon zf here. I don’t know if it’s my settings or what, but I found that when the monitor is flipped out, the eye sensor is not automatically disabled like on z6. So if I hold the camera too close to my body, it will auto switch to Evf. I have to use the monitor mode button to select for LCD only to stop the auto switching. Is it the normal behavior for Zf?
Found this:
"Note that, some models such as the Z 9 and Z 8 are equipped with additional sensors. The EVF will be disabled when the monitor is tilted, or not stowed in the storage position."
Thanks, I can’t imagine why it was on Z6 but not on zf, very annoying actually
snapsy wrote:
Found this:
"Note that, some models such as the Z 9 and Z 8 are equipped with additional sensors. The EVF will be disabled when the monitor is tilted, or not stowed in the storage position."
So, for those looking for more info on the accessory grips, I have done a pretty in-depth write-up and comparison of the four major grips out right now: Smallrig, Neewer, the wood grip, and Nikon's Zf-GR1.
I ended up with all of them because there was something I didn't like about each one I got, and the things I did like about each of them differed. The Nikon for me has struck the best balance in comfort, features and looks, but of course it's only sold in Japan, so I had to get mine from a Japanese seller on eBay.
Do you know the brand or model of the wood grip? Looks nice!
Jman13 wrote:
I got my wood grip in from eBay - so now I have this, the SmallRig and the Neewer grip. My thoughts:
Looks:
- I think the wood grip looks best, as it just has this elegant classic look to it. The Neewer is probably second, though I'm torn on the red stripe. Sometimes I like it, and other times I think it'd look better with out it. Smallrig is least attractive as it's just a black rubber block, but it also isn't bad looking.
Feel:
- Sort of a tossup between the wood and the Smallrig. The wood has a wonderful feel to it, and the surface feels way nicer than the super tacky rubber of the Smallrig, though when holding the cameras, it's a bit of a wash. The wood grip is deeper, and mine has sculpted finger indents which feel really nice, while the Smallrig is softer and my index finger sits slightly better on the shutter button with it. Overall, the Smallrig is probably the most comfortable to hold, but the wood is pretty close. The Neewer is definitely the worst here. While I like the finish, with it being closer to the bare camera than the smallrig, it's also a bit slick, so you have to squeeze harder to have positive control. Still better than the bare camera by a lot, though.
Arca/Swiss rail: I think the Neewer is just barely the best, as the rail goes from just past the battery compartment all the way to the end of the camera. The Smallrig is next, but the front dovetail doesn't quite go the edge. The wood grip has the worst A/S dovetail, being present only centered under the lens, so you can't slide it up for easier vertical shooting.
Quality: All are built quite well. The wood grip has what looks to be a lower grade of aluminum than the other two, but all fit very well, with no obvious misalignments or anything. The smallrig grip has the actual grip material slightly out from the camera's grip, but it compresses against the camera in use. The wood and Neewer grip both sit perfectly snug against the camera grip.
Overall, I think I like the wood grip the best for daily use, but I'll put the Smallrig on if I'm going to be mixing a lot of tripod use in. The Neewer grip will get some use when I want a change of pace, but will probably be on the camera the least of them.
A parting shot of the wood grip on my Zf: ...Show more →
Chris Cheng wrote:
Hi everyone, I’m new to Nikon zf here. I don’t know if it’s my settings or what, but I found that when the monitor is flipped out, the eye sensor is not automatically disabled like on z6. So if I hold the camera too close to my body, it will auto switch to Evf. I have to use the monitor mode button to select for LCD only to stop the auto switching. Is it the normal behavior for Zf?
Yeah, this is a minor annoyance of the Zf. When I switch from viewfinder use to the tilted LCD, the eye sensor remains active and the LCD can go dark because of the camera strap on the left, or my fingers in the wrong place.
I swapped playback and DISP button roles so the playback button is no longer near the eye sensor. I prefer having it near the lower right corner like it is in the Z8.
Looking at the B/S/T forum, my prediction of 6 months before people starting offloading their barely used, mint units came 2 months early. It was inevitable.
RoamingScott wrote:
Interesting that the chatter has all but died on the ZF, and barely any pics being shared from it across the various threads.
I've been enjoying mine quite a bit - and I've been posting in the Z images thread. It's my secondary / backup camera, but I am using it a lot more than the typical backup camera. My Z8 is still going to be my main choice moving forward for landscape, wildlife and a lot of other photography, but I like the Zf as a change of pace, and it's the camera I'm bringing with me to Italy this summer (along probably with an X100VI.)
I use mine every day , and still see plenty of photos posted from ZF's elsewhere. This forum is always chasing the latest tech ... doesn't mean anything. It sold well , Nikon did well last year. It's just a toy.
akul wrote:
I know, I know. But, isn't D6 sort of the king in terms of low light in all Nikon lineup today ? DF used D4 sensor.. Sort of boring think they once again use Z6 Z6II sensor once again. And, if they 'invest' a bit on the modified D6 sensor, they may add 'cross type' af sensor which apparently should help the AF?
Well, the D6 sensor is very much optimized for high ISO and colour consistency across ISO. The Zf is a general purpose camera and many users probably wanted a balanced dynamic range across the ISO range, which they got.
The Zf has very good image quality across its ISO range; not as good as D6 at very high ISO but better DR at every equal ISO than the Z8.
As a D6 user (for indoor sports and similar subjects) I think Nikon chose the correct sensor for the Zf.
As for cross-type sensors in mirrorless, I am sure Nikon consider the overall balance of performance and image quality to create the best overall outcome and eventually I do hope they would include cross-type sensors.
I've been using mine loads - got as a lighter alternative to my Z9 and apart from a few quirks pick it up for all the less serious 'stuff'. I'm nipping to a friends wedding tomorrow where there's an official photographer (no way would I want that job) so will take the Zf and Voigtlander 40mm f/1.2 and the 28mm without stress. I've seen loads of recent photos posted in other threads taken with the Zf and doubt there will be a ton of used ones for sale soon but..
Sounds like most people have been happy with the ZF from what I have read. It's more of a consumer body it's not going to cause buzz online like a Z8 or Z9 which is more geared towards professionals.
Personally I just wish they made a version with the 45mp sensor. I have just gotten way to used to high resolution sensors for the past 10+ years. Then I would definitely pick one up.
RoamingScott wrote:
Interesting that the chatter has all but died on the ZF, and barely any pics being shared from it across the various threads.
I like the camera but mostly because of how beautiful it looks. The main problem that I am finding with the camera is that it's really heavy and the ergonomics/handling really suffer because of it. I have the Small Rigs grip and even with the 40 f2 on the camera it's hard to get a good grip on the camera that is comfortable and allows for you to use your fingers to use the camera controls seamlessly.
The lack of native lenses that pair well with this camera is also another big issue. From a aesthetic point, there are only 2 Z lenses that look good on this camera, the 28 F2.8 and 40 F2. Both are good lenses but I am really wanting something a little longer like an 75-85 that fits this camera. The rest of the Z lineup just don't look good on this camera due to their very modern aesthetic.
You're only real option is the adapt other lenses but then you're stuck with having to add on an ugly adapter, the FTZ in particular looks awful on this body.
I am still going to keep the camera with the hopes that Nikon has some plans to release more SE style lenses in the future or that Sigma plans to release their i-series lenses.
thenoilif wrote:
I like the camera but mostly because of how beautiful it looks. The main problem that I am finding with the camera is that it's really heavy and the ergonomics/handling really suffer because of it. I have the Small Rigs grip and even with the 40 f2 on the camera it's hard to get a good grip on the camera that is comfortable and allows for you to use your fingers to use the camera controls seamlessly.
The lack of native lenses that pair well with this camera is also another big issue. From a aesthetic point, there are only 2 Z lenses that look good on this camera, the 28 F2.8 and 40 F2. Both are good lenses but I am really wanting something a little longer like an 75-85 that fits this camera. The rest of the Z lineup just don't look good on this camera due to their very modern aesthetic.
You're only real option is the adapt other lenses but then you're stuck with having to add on an ugly adapter, the FTZ in particular looks awful on this body.
I am still going to keep the camera with the hopes that Nikon has some plans to release more SE style lenses in the future or that Sigma plans to release their i-series lenses.
I kind of agree , but looks ain’t everything , I go from adapted leica M lenses to Z super telephoto . Don’t worry a lot about the looks , but to each their own. I do own the 28/40 pair , it would be nice the have a matching 85 1.8 .
I swear my Zf weighs more or less what my M240 body does. If you go for some of the new manual lenses and take advantage of the focus aids available you're not stuck with the 28/40mm SE's?
