nehemiahphoto Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
Fred Miranda wrote:
I agree that these lenses provide distinct characteristics and create unique visual results. I must say that I thoroughly enjoy the samples you shared from the Sonnetar lens.
Certainly, I have indeed tested the CV 75/1.9 lens. As a matter of fact, I was the one who wrote the review in this discussion thread. Undoubtedly, the CV 35/2 Ultron or Leica 35/1.4 FLE lenses exhibit a similar aesthetic to the CV 75/1.9 lens, although I believe the rendering of the latter is slightly more modern.
I have a personal preference for the rendering of the CV 75/1.9 Ultron lens compared to the smoother CV 75/1.5 lens. In my opinion, the Sonnetar lens shares more similarities with the CV 35/1.4 Nokton or Leica 35/1.4 pre-asph lenses than any other 35mm lens. Currently, I am in Japan and I plan to look for the 73/1.5 lens and acquire it if I come across it.
...Show more →
lolol
I am a total space hog— I completely forgot this thread was even a review thread and therefore you’ve owned the lens obviously, I was just posting images and responding to your question 😅
And I agree with you on all other account as well. I love my 35 Lux pre-asph and Sonnetar combo. But my CV 35/2 and 75/1.9 get a lot of run too. Sadly, my modded a7r2 is dying, so that's putting a damper on things. At least on the 35mm front for the CV 35/2.
I actually sold my 35 Lux FLE to Steve, but I miss it more than I thought I would, and I might buy another.
|