p.21 #1 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
Lance B wrote:
If you are happy with your camera that's great, but there is no need to come here and tell us as we don't care. That just shows that you are very insecure about your camera. I have never felt insecure about my cameras and thus never feel the need to have to try to convince others in another camera forum of my decision on the camera I use. Sorry to see you are so insecure about your purchase.
Serious question... if you're shooting raw, do the camera's colors matter anyway? Short of using the camera matching color profiles? I load everything into LR as Nikon's Camera Standard and keep it that way but I know a lot of folks edit in the default Adobe color profiles.
Maybe the wrong thread for this, but something I've always wondered.
p.21 #3 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
agvogel wrote:
Serious question... if you're shooting raw, do the camera's colors matter anyway? Short of using the camera matching color profiles? I load everything into LR as Nikon's Camera Standard and keep it that way but I know a lot of folks edit in the default Adobe color profiles.
Maybe the wrong thread for this, but something I've always wondered.
Definitely the wrong thread but I will answer you anyway as you asked me a specific question. Mostly, color can be adjusted to suit how you like it. The lenses are what make more of a difference, IMO. Things like ARNEO coatings, Fluorine coatings and individual elements etc make up how a photo looks moreso than colors which can be adjusted.
p.21 #4 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
Lance B wrote:
Definitely the wrong thread but I will answer you anyway as you asked me a specific question. Mostly, color can be adjusted to suit how you like it. The lenses are what make more of a difference, IMO. Things like ARNEO coatings, Fluorine coatings and individual elements etc make up how a photo looks moreso than colors which can be adjusted.
Thanks, very interesting. I'll shut up now and keep it on topic.
p.21 #5 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
leonasj wrote:
as always poor nikon colors.im was many years nikon,later canon,now fuji medium format user.now happy
leonasj wrote:
hello,im bought from ebay used GFX-50R ,but only 2week old,still has warranty 2years,new was bought 2021-12-19. ,but many my shots with gf45,gf50,gf63 shots is not sharp,im found that camera has inside clunking.Moving inside part only hear when camera without lens (i dont have lens this time)shaking horizontally,when shaking vertically there is no sound clunk inside. is this normal for this camera ?ot it can be dropped and sold?
p.21 #8 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
agvogel wrote:
Serious question... if you're shooting raw, do the camera's colors matter anyway? Short of using the camera matching color profiles? I load everything into LR as Nikon's Camera Standard and keep it that way but I know a lot of folks edit in the default Adobe color profiles.
Maybe the wrong thread for this, but something I've always wondered.
Excellent question, and one which would be great in its own thread.
From my understanding, particularly with my experience using Fuji cameras, RAW files are manipulated by the camera software.
However, from my experience using custom X-Rite profiles, I can get the processed colours of RAW files from Nikon, Olympus, and Fuji, to be so close it is hard to tell which camera they came from.
p.21 #9 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
leonasj wrote:
as always poor nikon colors.im was many years nikon,later canon,now fuji medium format user.now happy
Funny. As a person who also own GFX100 along with Nikon, I always find Fuji default color is horrible. Way too much black that detail in the shadow got lost and require a lot more post processing to bring back those detail in comparison to Nikon. Great file quality but color is not its best feature and since this is all subjective and based on personal preference, your opinion is pretty irrerevant.
Also this is a thread about 100-400 lens, who cares if you like Fuji color better.
so happy, im googled that normal for 50r- it's the physical orientation sensor in the camera that tells it which way is up for portrait and landscape
Feb 04, 2022 at 07:15 AM
leonasj Offline • • • [X]
p.21 #16 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
Lance B wrote:
If you are happy with your camera that's great, but there is no need to come here and tell us as we don't care. That just shows that you are very insecure about your camera. I have never felt insecure about my cameras and thus never feel the need to have to try to convince others in another camera forum of my decision on the camera I use. Sorry to see you are so insecure about your purchase.
im googled that normal for 50r- it's the physical orientation sensor in the camera that tells it which way is up for portrait and landscape
p.21 #18 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
leonasj wrote:
hello,im bought from ebay used GFX-50R ,but only 2week old,still has warranty 2years,new was bought 2021-12-19. ,but many my shots with gf45,gf50,gf63 shots is not sharp,im found that camera has inside clunking.Moving inside part only hear when camera without lens (i dont have lens this time)shaking horizontally,when shaking vertically there is no sound clunk inside. is this normal for this camera ?ot it can be dropped and sold?
leonasj wrote:
so happy, im googled that normal for 50r- it's the physical orientation sensor in the camera that tells it which way is up for portrait and landscape
So Dr Google confirmed rattles and soft images are normal when using the GFX-50R with GF45, GF50, and GF63 lenses. I'm happy for you that you have it sorted.
This thread is about the Nikkor Z 100-400mm lens, and so far, regardless which body it is being used on, the images are lovely and sharp!
p.21 #19 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
Wanted to get out back and try the 100-400 with the TC-2.0x so here's a selection from this morning. Can't believe it's that fast and sharp at f11 on a zoom lens!
Z9, 100-400S, TC-2.0X all at 800mm
Brown Thrasher on the fence
Carolina Chickadee
I think a house finch
Something growing from one of the plants, probably some kind of seed
