naturephoto1 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Fred Miranda wrote:
8.9 out of 10? Based on what?
I didn't see any direct comparison to the Leica 28/2 Cron so, without a side by sides, it's just his opinion.
There is definitely some hype with Leica lenses and lots of reviewers like to think that if a lens is pricey, it must be better optically. All lenses have compromises but there are some merits to the cost of Leica lenses as they are very well built with extremely tight tolerance and low variance which is not cheap to produce. However, although most Leica M-lenses perform at a high level for their size, some third party lenses can perform even better at a fraction of the price.
The CV 28/2 II is just 'ok' at the corners? Just check these crops:
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1704868/0#15621051
Yes, definitely pixel peeping there and that was on 40MP.
He spent half of the video talking about vignetting fall-off but I would not worry about it that much and think all small 28mm f/2 lenses would perform similarly before correction. (in-camera or in-post)...Show more →
Hi Fred,
Your link for the corners shows the crops near infinity. Below is an image taken with the lens and my Kolari Vision UT sensor modified A7rII which isn't quite as good with the wide angle M-mount lenses as the M- series Leicas. The full frame image was posted in this thread previously; focus was on the spikes of flowers at between 5 and 10' or so away, taken at f4 and yes this was processed in LR with sharpening and detail increased from LR default of 25 to 28 and 27 respectively and also no adjustment for vignetting. It was just fortuitist that the corners were basically at the same distance as the focus point. The second and third images are the lower left and lower right corners respectively of the image at 100% and again, the lens was set to f4.
Rich
|