fwdesign Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
You’re right, we need to see more. The Summicron has 0 distortion and a beautiful rendering, so it’s entirely possible it’s still superior in some aspects.
Also, now that Voigtlander has knocked it out of the park with this 28mm f/2, I would love to see them make a 28mm f/1.4 Nokton.
Steve Spencer wrote:
This lens looks great and I will almost certainly get one, but before we start comparing it to other lenses in terms of overall performance I want to wait until Fred finishes his tests. For me I would like to see a 28 f/2 also be able to be decent for some kinds of portraits. We don't know how this lens will fare yet for that. How is the rendering? Nice bokeh or will it be a bit busy? How about the transition zone? I am hopeful it will be a bit like my CVM 35 f/1.7 with generally nice bokeh and a decent transition zone, but that is a tough ask in such a small and inexpensive lens. IMO, one of the strengths of both the Leica M 28 f/2 I and II is that it has a very nice rendering and nice bokeh. Will this lens match that performance? Hopefully Fred will give us more information soon.
How does the lens do when shooting into the sun? We know it will have nice 10 pointed sunstars, but will it flare a lot? How about axial CA and purple fringing? How about coma? Not trying to be a wet blanket, and I do think everything Fred has posted so far looks great, (and if this is the lens' only strength I will still probably buy it) but let's see the full picture of the lens' strengths and weakness before we declare that all other lenses are obsolete....Show more →
|