p.1 #1Sony A1 - Bird Photography Camera for Dummies
First off, I am not a camera tester; just a passionate photographer who does a fair amount of bird photography. Here is my opinion mostly on the advantages of the A1 over my existing camera for that purpose, the A9 II, after using the A1 on 2 outings albeit both were short.
Of course, I will use the camera also for other types of photography, like portraits, landscape and some macro but for the most part, the main reason for the to get the A1 is for bird photography or fast action photography. The A7r IV could easily do landscape, portraits and macro and to a certain degree, in terms of resolution, it is even better than the A1.
I have been happy with the AF performance of the A9 II. There are several quirks but I could overlook those. But the main drawback of that camera for me is the resolution. Unless you could get your target to fill the frame in a nice composition or close to it, cropping to (larger than) 100% brings up some shortcomings. With that said, since I know before hand that the camera has a 50MP sensor, then the point is moot but if the AF performance of the A1 is better than that of the A9 II, that's the added benefit.
Just like in portrait or people photography, the emphasis is on the eye or eyes of the target to be in focus.There are a lot of talks about birds-eye AF (BE-AF) after the R5 came out . I didn't miss BE-AF on my A9 II but I could see the benefits of BE-AF for perched birds or for in-flight larger birds. Although the Zone-AF has performed superbly in keeping the eye or eyes in focus most of the time but there are situations where the camera would focus somewhere else, like closer and contrasty parts of wings, for example.
So, how is the BE-AF on this camera? For the first time in my life, I turned on this feature yesterday. This male falcon was eating his kill but he was facing the other way. Well, that's wildlife, what can I say. So, the camera was focusing on the body but this falcon lifted up his head quite often, looked to the right and to the left and wham, the BE-AF picked up the eye immediately each time it did. The first image shows the entire scene to see how far away the falcon was and the second is the 100% crop of the same file. The same goes for the third image where the BE-AF was activated right away. Frankly, artistically or bird photography-wise the images are not great and I wouldn’t bother in real life but they are fine to showcase my point.
The 100% crops look really great coming from this 50MP sensor. If you look at the cropped image(s), the entire falcon body was pretty much in focus. So, did the camera shift the focus from the body to the eye when it lifted the head? Who knows but one thing for sure, it makes us the user feels good to see that the BE-AF works, at least based on the indicator . The BE-AF indicator is an overlay on the EVF anyway. So far, even falcons at a distance are fairly small and the depth-of-field renders the entire bird in focus although the eye is in critical focus for sure. I am not saying that it is gimmick though, at least not yet . We will see how well the BE-AF performs down the road. But so far, I have been very pleased with the AF performance, be it due to the BE-AF or not, but for sure with the increased resolution over the A9 II. This camera ticks most if not all the boxes for me. The American kestrel image is a 100% crop from the original file. I know that that file shows finer details and better rendition had I taken that image with my A9 II.
The Sony A1 makes the life of a photographer, who wants to dabble into bird photography, easier. I would call this camera as a “Bird Photography Camera for Dummies” . Of course, I meant no offense here. Frankly, it feels like cheating... in a good way though, and the heck why not?
The other images are some perched and in-flight images captured in the last 2 days. And yes, with the BE-AF on each time, of course. I will add more images as they come in but it is not intended to compete with the A1 image thread posted in this forum, which is geared more for sharing images.
I hope this little insight is helpful in some way,
Joshua
p.1 #2Sony A1 - Bird Photography Camera for Dummies
Thanks for sharing your first impressions Joshua.
Having had access to another "Bird Photography Camera for Dummies" in the R5 since October I can relate.
I'm just glad that I can now rid myself of the R5 and the "slow" 100-500 lens and mount a Camera for Dummies on my 600GM and 200-600
I've only had about 10mins with the A1 aimed at a bird and it found the eye of the perched hummingbird when it was really small in the frame. I actually forgot about the Eye-AF when I first aimed it at the hummer and then saw the grey box appear out of nowhere.
Lots of testing for me will come over the next few days.
Unfortunately in just my 10mins with the camera I discovered a feature they broke compared to how my A9II/A7RIV work. On those cameras I would assign AF-ON to Registered AF Function Hold. I would assign my button on the lens to Tracking ON. If I held in the Tracking On button on the lens and then activated my Registered AF Function Hold it would switch into the tracking variant of whichever AF area I had registered. On the A1 it doesn't
I'm going to have to figure out a new workflow. But with the addition of the REC button as another Back button I think I have a way to get what I want out of it.
p.1 #3Sony A1 - Bird Photography Camera for Dummies
arbitrage wrote:
Thanks for sharing your first impressions Joshua.
Having had access to another "Bird Photography Camera for Dummies" in the R5 since October I can relate.
I'm just glad that I can now rid myself of the R5 and the "slow" 100-500 lens and mount a Camera for Dummies on my 600GM and 200-600
I've only had about 10mins with the A1 aimed at a bird and it found the eye of the perched hummingbird when it was really small in the frame. I actually forgot about the Eye-AF when I first aimed it at the hummer and then saw the grey box appear out of nowhere.
Lots of testing for me will come over the next few days.
Unfortunately in just my 10mins with the camera I discovered a feature they broke compared to how my A9II/A7RIV work. On those cameras I would assign AF-ON to Registered AF Function Hold. I would assign my button on the lens to Tracking ON. If I held in the Tracking On button on the lens and then activated my Registered AF Function Hold it would switch into the tracking variant of whichever AF area I had registered. On the A1 it doesn't
I'm going to have to figure out a new workflow. But with the addition of the REC button as another Back button I think I have a way to get what I want out of it....Show more →
Great to hear that you got yours, Geoff! Yes, I changed a few settings on mine, too. The funny thing is right now, I still need to figure out how to make the viewfinder blink while shooting to remind me that I am shooting. I need to pull out the manual then . Dang, I thought I could get away without that.
p.1 #4Sony A1 - Bird Photography Camera for Dummies
AGeoJO wrote: arbitrage wroteThanks for sharing your first impressions Joshua.
Having had access to another "Bird Photography Camera for Dummies" in the R5 since October I can relate.
I'm just glad that I can now rid myself of the R5 and the "slow" 100-500 lens and mount a Camera for Dummies on my 600GM and 200-600
I've only had about 10mins with the A1 aimed at a bird and it found the eye of the perched hummingbird when it was really small in the frame. I actually forgot about the Eye-AF when I first aimed it at the hummer and then saw the grey box appear out of nowhere.
Lots of testing for me will come over the next few days.
Unfortunately in just my 10mins with the camera I discovered a feature they broke compared to how my A9II/A7RIV work. On those cameras I would assign AF-ON to Registered AF Function Hold. I would assign my button on the lens to Tracking ON. If I held in the Tracking On button on the lens and then activated my Registered AF Function Hold it would switch into the tracking variant of whichever AF area I had registered. On the A1 it doesn't
I'm going to have to figure out a new workflow. But with the addition of the REC button as another Back button I think I have a way to get what I want out of it.Great to hear that you got yours, Geoff! Yes, I changed a few settings on mine, too. The funny thing is right now, I still need to figure out how to make the viewfinder blink while shooting to remind me that I am shooting. I need to pull out the manual then . Dang, I thought I could get away without that.
p.1 #12Sony A1 - Bird Photography Camera for Dummies
arbitrage wrote: AGeoJO wrotearbitrage wroteThanks for sharing your first impressions Joshua.
Having had access to another "Bird Photography Camera for Dummies" in the R5 since October I can relate.
I'm just glad that I can now rid myself of the R5 and the "slow" 100-500 lens and mount a Camera for Dummies on my 600GM and 200-600
I've only had about 10mins with the A1 aimed at a bird and it found the eye of the perched hummingbird when it was really small in the frame. I actually forgot about the Eye-AF when I first aimed it at the hummer and then saw the grey box appear out of nowhere.
Lots of testing for me will come over the next few days.
Unfortunately in just my 10mins with the camera I discovered a feature they broke compared to how my A9II/A7RIV work. On those cameras I would assign AF-ON to Registered AF Function Hold. I would assign my button on the lens to Tracking ON. If I held in the Tracking On button on the lens and then activated my Registered AF Function Hold it would switch into the tracking variant of whichever AF area I had registered. On the A1 it doesn't
I'm going to have to figure out a new workflow. But with the addition of the REC button as another Back button I think I have a way to get what I want out of it.Great to hear that you got yours, Geoff! Yes, I changed a few settings on mine, too. The funny thing is right now, I still need to figure out how to make the viewfinder blink while shooting to remind me that I am shooting. I need to pull out the manual then . Dang, I thought I could get away without that.Let me help you with that one.
It is called Shoot Timing Display and is located in Setup, Display Option, Shoot Timing Display https://helpguide.sony.net/ilc/2040/v1/en/contents/TP0002924539.html
I've always preferred option 2 that is a blue border around the AF point and not just out at the periphery.
That’s it and thank you, Geoff! I scrolled through that but somehow I missed it. It is something that you set one time at the beginning and forget about it.
p.1 #14Sony A1 - Bird Photography Camera for Dummies
ramesesthe2nd wrote: Laslo Varadi wroteI practiced a little on Canada Geese today. The BEAF worked well.But these particular birds are so lazy that you can shoot them with your phone. No need to buy A1 for that.
p.1 #16Sony A1 - Bird Photography Camera for Dummies
Thanks for the interesting post, Joshua.
I'm interested in your comment about "feels like cheating," which is something I've felt at every stage of the advance of digital photography. Each stage makes it easier (and easier for non-pros) to get high quality versions of the images you could, with sufficient skill and thought, get before. Hence the proliferation of high quality images on forums that, 10 years ago, you would only see in Audubon or National Geographic.
What I have hopes to see from the experts here, eventually, is images you actually couldn't have gotten before. That is the challenge!!
One thing that struck me as I followed the R5 discussions was that the images people have gotten, while wonderful, don't appear to be anything particularly new. Maybe people can see quality differences on the full size files on their own monitors, and downsizing the files for posting here just takes too much of a hit on the quality (I would be interested to hear about that!). No doubt hit rates or keeper rates also go way up with each technology iteration, and will certainly do that here.
But I maintain the hope of seeing things that, either in terms of animal behavior or artistic expression, would have been almost impossible before.
p.1 #17Sony A1 - Bird Photography Camera for Dummies
roadapple wrote:
Joshua, Great info about the A1, and you once again demonstrate the capture of beautiful images to back it all up ! Look forward to seeing more !!!
louie champan wrote:
Great set Joshua, appreciate your sharing your findings so far. I'm getting envious already.
twodees wrote:
Thanks for sharing your thoughts Joshua, look forward to reading/seeing more over the coming weeks
Douglas Liu wrote:
Appreciate the write-up, Joshua!
Thank you very much, gents! I am taking a break today but I will go out again tomorrow morning. I will update my findings some more later.
JeyB wrote:
Hi Joshua. Did you have the oportunity to mount the 200-600? Any issue related to fron/back focus?
Thanks a lot
Hi JeyB, not yet but I will tomorrow. However, I really do not anticipate that lens to perform worse than on the A9 II. I will post my findings after that here.
p.1 #19Sony A1 - Bird Photography Camera for Dummies
photonoclast wrote:
Thanks for the interesting post, Joshua.
I'm interested in your comment about "feels like cheating," which is something I've felt at every stage of the advance of digital photography. Each stage makes it easier (and easier for non-pros) to get high quality versions of the images you could, with sufficient skill and thought, get before. Hence the proliferation of high quality images on forums that, 10 years ago, you would only see in Audubon or National Geographic.
What I have hopes to see from the experts here, eventually, is images you actually couldn't have gotten before. That is the challenge!!
One thing that struck me as I followed the R5 discussions was that the images people have gotten, while wonderful, don't appear to be anything particularly new. Maybe people can see quality differences on the full size files on their own monitors, and downsizing the files for posting here just takes too much of a hit on the quality (I would be interested to hear about that!). No doubt hit rates or keeper rates also go way up with each technology iteration, and will certainly do that here.
But I maintain the hope of seeing things that, either in terms of animal behavior or artistic expression, would have been almost impossible before. ...Show more →
Thank you for bringing up a valid point, photonoclast!
You are correct about the proliferation of high quality images that can be found here and at other on-line sources. And to a certain degree we are expecting more and more from our gear and yes, our skill. The way I look at it in wildlife is you have to be there at the right location and at the right moment. You can anticipate some magic moments to happen but whether it actually does, it is up to nature. And of course, your gear has to have the right specs and to perform well if you are exposed to that situation. The point I am making is this:
I was at the falcon site last Sunday. There was a mid-air food transfer but it was way out there over the ocean. Although I had a total of 840mm effective focal length, I couldn't get any images that look decent enough to be posted on-line. The female falcon flew back to the ledge where I was standing. It dove under the ledge as it flew closer and disappeared from my view. It came back up from below, at least from my perspective, and I couldn't guess where or what part of the ledge it would appear. I missed the landing. I got it after it had landed but nothing spectacular. Another photographer was way to the left and he could see and follow the falcon fly under and come back up. He captured the landing with the prey still moving... What a great capture! He was at the right place and the right time. His gear? Sony A9 II and G 200-600mm lens. I had the same setup that morning but I was not at the right position. Yes, I missed that opportunity since I didn't get the note where the falcon would land .
And here is another factor where the gear would play a role. If you get 30 FPS, the chance that you capture the peak moment or moments is greater than if you get 10 FPS and even significantly less, if you shoot a single frame. By using a higher frame rate, you are increasing your chance in getting that one magical shot that other photographers may miss. Of course, some photographers may get lucky by even taking single frames but believe me, it doesn't happen that often.