zhangyue Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.8 #13 · Best Voigtlander M-mount lenses for Leica and Sony sensors | |
rscheffler wrote:
Hi Michael,
Yes, I recall you mentioned that before and I don't doubt it. I don't want to sidetrack this thread too much with my 28 Cron v2 experience because it's probably not representative of the majority of the copies of this lens.
I also wonder about the adaptability of the 50/2 to M mount for the reasons you mentiond. As you know, protruding rear elements are not uncommon with M lenses. However, the 50/2's block diagram indicates the rear element diameter is quite large and therefore may not port easily to M mount. IMO that would be unfortunate... As a consolation, I would accept it in Canon RF mount, which I think should be straightforward....Show more →
Hi, Ron, I was surprised to see it was that good actually, because of your post in LUF, I hold my purchase as I trust your evaluation more than most of fans over there. I finally bite the bullet to buy it because I no longer have 28mm M lens, I had and loved v1, but with RX1, I almost never use it anymore and then I sold my RX1 and start missing 28mm. It do have focus shift and I didn't thoroughly evaluate it at mid distance but only infinity. So you might be right that it do have FC just I didn't notice it, but at infinity, the f2 performance is more like f4 of v1 at extreme corner. (both one copy )
With R5, you are covered with all great AF glasses and hopefully soon VC manual glasses
---------------------------------------------
Steve Spencer wrote:
I suspect it might take some reformulation of the design (and that is why we haven't seen a Leica M version yet), but probably more for the flange distance than for the mount diameter. The Leica M has a 44mm diameter and the Sony E is 46.1mm, so they are fairly close and this is only an f/2 lens, so I suspect the diameter is fine. I would not be surprised if it took a reformulation to deal with the about 10mm difference in registration distance, however. I sure hope they do make it as a Leica M mount lens as it would be a great alternative on that mount and would put some nice pressure on Leica to lower the price of their 50 f/2 APO....Show more →
It would be great they can port the design to M, I really do think this is a preferred solution to user like me that don't want lock into a single system. With Z mount, I can only use on Nikon. Even FE mount, I am limited to only to Sony and Nikon but I don't want get back to Sony, at least till today, there is nothing make me want to get back for users don't use their AF tech.
Having said that, 50lux is still my favorite 50mm lens, I sold my 50APO and keep it simple. I bought a few Voigtlander glasses over the year, but sold them all after a period, I know they are popular here, 40mm f1.2 is one of better ones I liked but still prefer Leica glass in the end. I may not need this f2 APO either 
|