This topic is in the 2019 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 2019Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
p.2 #1Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
I knew the Sony was good but that Batis 18 is impressive. Now I'm wondering if I should get another one...
Oct 05, 2019 at 05:30 PM
p.2 #2Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
As you can see the CV40 has less vignetting so the Sony needs work in my book. Yes I see that stinking dust bunny. 
Oct 05, 2019 at 05:33 PM
p.2 #3Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
ftllens wrote:
I knew the Sony was good but that Batis 18 is impressive. Now I'm wondering if I should get another one...
I think there is some copy variance but agree this one here is freaking killer. I thought about the 14-24 Sigma but I cant imagine it beating this Batis. I may have to send it to Fred for a test after I get back from New York
I knew the Sony was good but that Batis 18 is impressive. Now I'm wondering if I should get another one...
I think there is some copy variance but agree this one here is freaking killer. I thought about the 14-24 Sigma but I cant imagine it beating this Batis. I may have to send it to Fred for a test after I get back from New York
Oct 05, 2019 at 05:34 PM
p.2 #4Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
Here is another test at Infinity at F5.6. Now it maybe weaker at infinity compared to BB distance. This is worth a another test its very small difference. POn center its really good but see just a touch and I mean a touch weakness in the corners. I dont think anything wrong but more about design
Oct 05, 2019 at 05:40 PM
p.2 #5Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
BTW I did not shoot anymore of the CV 40 on this test after BB. I did not have a ton of time this morning I shot my Batis 85. Lets show that , you all get a nice sample of glass
Oct 05, 2019 at 05:43 PM
p.2 #6Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
This may have something to do with corners being a touch softer as im on a angle to the building so background is getting a little soft . I see it here on the 85 so it maybe affecting the 35mm on either side of center. Would like to be more flat to subject but a good idea
Oct 05, 2019 at 05:48 PM
p.2 #7Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
Batis 85 at F5.6 so DOF is a little thin as well
Oct 05, 2019 at 05:48 PM
p.2 #8Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
Okay keep a eye on the Exif data I did a few runs for Bokeh. Im handheld here so maybe slight movement between frames. FYI I shoot ugly, better terms i want to know when things get ugly so i can avoid them for real. Testing pretty tells you nothing. Where are the problems. Color looks really good
Oct 05, 2019 at 05:57 PM
p.2 #9Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
Another aperture run
Oct 05, 2019 at 05:58 PM
p.2 #11Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
Watch the bokeh balls on the series above.
I need to test more but so far very nice indeed
I need to test more but so far very nice indeed
Oct 05, 2019 at 06:01 PM
p.2 #12Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
Anyway lets hear some thoughts
Oct 05, 2019 at 06:02 PM
p.2 #13Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
I lied I have more. 
Trying different subject distances from lens
Trying different subject distances from lens Oct 05, 2019 at 06:04 PM
p.2 #14Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
Let me be perfectly honest i paid almost zero attention to this lens and got fed up one day and on impulse i bought it. I heard a few things but never rally sung in. But this dang thing is quite good. Its laser like on center
Oct 05, 2019 at 06:18 PM
p.2 #15Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
Really appreciate and respect the time and thought you put into these tests.
I have a love/hate relationship with your testing approach .. I love it because I believe your process is similar to how I would use the various lenses. I hate it because every time I think I am done purchasing a new lens, your post convinces me otherwise
I have been thinking of filling the gap between my 24 and 50 and consider the 35 a great walk-around focal length. Currently using my 24-105 as my walk-around but would prefer something faster and the 35/1.8 seems like it would work great.
I have a love/hate relationship with your testing approach .. I love it because I believe your process is similar to how I would use the various lenses. I hate it because every time I think I am done purchasing a new lens, your post convinces me otherwise
I have been thinking of filling the gap between my 24 and 50 and consider the 35 a great walk-around focal length. Currently using my 24-105 as my walk-around but would prefer something faster and the 35/1.8 seems like it would work great.
Oct 05, 2019 at 06:19 PM
p.2 #16Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
Thanks for the test Guy!
The FE 35/1.8 is capable of great resolution and contrast. Very punchy lens.
I think that rendering at close distance is pleasant and bokeh balls are very clean. There are better options for rendering at mid-distance but we can't have it all. Vignetting and CA are also negatives imo.
I think it complements the FE 85/1.8 very nicely for a light and compact 35/85 combo with fast AF, without breaking the bank.
The FE 35/1.8 is capable of great resolution and contrast. Very punchy lens.
I think that rendering at close distance is pleasant and bokeh balls are very clean. There are better options for rendering at mid-distance but we can't have it all. Vignetting and CA are also negatives imo.
I think it complements the FE 85/1.8 very nicely for a light and compact 35/85 combo with fast AF, without breaking the bank.
Oct 05, 2019 at 06:19 PM
p.2 #17Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
offtraildog wrote:
Really appreciate and respect the time and thought you put into these tests.
I have a love/hate relationship with your testing approach .. I love it because I believe your process is similar to how I would use the various lenses. I hate it because every time I think I am done purchasing a new lens, your post convinces me otherwise
I have been thinking of filling the gap between my 24 and 50 and consider the 35 a great walk-around focal length. Currently using my 24-105 as my walk-around but would prefer something faster and the 35/1.8 seems like...Show more →
Yea I seem to get on a lot of spouses black lists.
Thanks that was nice of you to say
Really appreciate and respect the time and thought you put into these tests.
I have a love/hate relationship with your testing approach .. I love it because I believe your process is similar to how I would use the various lenses. I hate it because every time I think I am done purchasing a new lens, your post convinces me otherwise
I have been thinking of filling the gap between my 24 and 50 and consider the 35 a great walk-around focal length. Currently using my 24-105 as my walk-around but would prefer something faster and the 35/1.8 seems like...Show more →
Yea I seem to get on a lot of spouses black lists.
Thanks that was nice of you to say
Oct 05, 2019 at 06:21 PM
p.2 #18Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
Fred Miranda wrote:
Thanks for the test Guy!
The FE 35/1.8 is capable of great resolution and contrast. Very punchy lens.
I think that rendering at close distance is pleasant and bokeh balls are very clean. There are better options for rendering at mid-distance but we can't have it all. Vignetting and CA are also negatives imo.
I think it complements the FE 85/1.8 very nicely for a light and compact 35/85 combo with fast AF.
Yes its not perfect for sure but I think it punches its price range. The CA needs some help and so does the vignetting. Both of those are the little buggers
Thanks for the test Guy!
The FE 35/1.8 is capable of great resolution and contrast. Very punchy lens.
I think that rendering at close distance is pleasant and bokeh balls are very clean. There are better options for rendering at mid-distance but we can't have it all. Vignetting and CA are also negatives imo.
I think it complements the FE 85/1.8 very nicely for a light and compact 35/85 combo with fast AF.
Yes its not perfect for sure but I think it punches its price range. The CA needs some help and so does the vignetting. Both of those are the little buggers
Oct 05, 2019 at 06:22 PM
p.2 #19Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
Im on a 61mpx camera folks and handheld for most of this and had 3 espressos this morning.
Oct 05, 2019 at 06:23 PM
p.2 #20Sony 35mm 1.8, CV 40 1.2, Batis 18mm, Batis 85mm Big Bronco
GMPhotography wrote:
Anyway lets hear some thoughts
There's something strange with the vignetting. Below is my copy on A7R3, f/5.6, uncorrected and then corrected at 100%. With the slider past 100% it looks even better but I just wanted to be spot on with what Phase One engineers think it should be in most circumstances.
Did you upgrade Capture 1 to 12.1.3 and select the Capture profile for the lens instead of Manufacturer? I had the same issue before upgrading (i.e. Capture didn't seem to be able to correct it properly) but now it pretty much works. And it's exactly the same lens and camera.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48849879291_ba4a9ba382_o_d.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48849523358_ed0176c0da_o_d.jpg
Sorry for not having such clear sky as you lol
Anyway lets hear some thoughts
There's something strange with the vignetting. Below is my copy on A7R3, f/5.6, uncorrected and then corrected at 100%. With the slider past 100% it looks even better but I just wanted to be spot on with what Phase One engineers think it should be in most circumstances.
Did you upgrade Capture 1 to 12.1.3 and select the Capture profile for the lens instead of Manufacturer? I had the same issue before upgrading (i.e. Capture didn't seem to be able to correct it properly) but now it pretty much works. And it's exactly the same lens and camera.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48849879291_ba4a9ba382_o_d.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48849523358_ed0176c0da_o_d.jpg
Sorry for not having such clear sky as you lol
Oct 05, 2019 at 06:36 PM