p.5 #1 · Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G Image Thread
AGeoJO wrote:
Yes, a 1.4X TC was used on both lenses, reducing the effective aperture by the same factor. And I messed up in saying that the difference in effective aperture was ½ or ⅓-stop. I should have said that difference was more like 1½ or 1⅓-stop instead. Alan also specified that he used the same setting of the A7 III but I am not sure whether he ended up doing something equalize the actual exposure to compensate for the difference. But really, not that it maters much, if anything, at this point.....
You were surprised how little the difference in sharpness between the Canon 600mm mark II and the Sony 200-600mm. I was surprised to see the difference or barely lack thereof between that zoom lens with the GM 600mm even. Upon closer look, I started seeing more of a difference, in addition to the smoother bokeh of the image taken with the prime lens, now, but still not much... Surprise, surprise !...Show more →
I'm sure the other big advantage of the prime will be once you start slapping on TCs....it should hold up a lot better at 1200mm....got to get something for one's $11K
p.5 #2 · Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G Image Thread
arbitrage wrote:
I'm sure the other big advantage of the prime will be once you start slapping on TCs....it should hold up a lot better at 1200mm....got to get something for one's $11K
Yes and the AF performance between the two, of course!
p.5 #11 · Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G Image Thread
So many GREAT shots! This is killing me. Mine is still waiting to ship. Interesting how so many of the shots are taken at either 600mm or with the TC 1.4. My experience with longer Sigma zooms was always that the majority of my shots were taken at the longest FL. Looks like my Canon 400mm will be leaving my closet
p.5 #13 · Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G Image Thread
MedicineMan404 wrote:
Yep, I've got a 400DOii I need to market. A dear old friend, but it feels heavier than the 200-600.
Good to hear about the weight....I always find the 400DOII to feel heavier than it really is. The 200-600 supposedly is identical weight to the 400DOII but then I usually have one or the other TC on the 400DOII so I was hoping the 200-600 would feel better.
p.5 #14 · Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G Image Thread
Can any of the experienced shooters comment on if the 200-600 without TC can add any significant value to 100-400+TC other than a slight extra reach and slightly faster speed? I'm a total rookie in wild life. Thinking about just learning with an a6400 with 100-400+TC.
p.5 #15 · Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G Image Thread
arbitrage wrote:
Good to hear about the weight....I always find the 400DOII to feel heavier than it really is. The 200-600 supposedly is identical weight to the 400DOII but then I usually have one or the other TC on the 400DOII so I was hoping the 200-600 would feel better.
Subjective eh, and I think it is the big front element of the DOii.
p.5 #17 · Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G Image Thread
dalite wrote:
_______
Roan High Knob should do it. Just drive carefully on those twisties.
Haha Dennis! How did this comment make it into the 200-600 thread when I think it belongs in the wide field astro thread!
But next weekend we'll be going over Roan High Knob on a three day backpacking trip from Hughes Gap to 19E...over the 21 miles we'll have a bit over 10,000 feet of vertical gain (and 14,000 feet of loss). I plan to hang the first night on Roan High Knob in my hammock There will be no camera(s) in the backpack. I've learned to do these hikes with the absolute minimal outlay in weight. My base weight will be right at 10 pounds
p.5 #19 · Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G Image Thread
gordec wrote:
Can any of the experienced shooters comment on if the 200-600 without TC can add any significant value to 100-400+TC other than a slight extra reach and slightly faster speed? I'm a total rookie in wild life. Thinking about just learning with an a6400 with 100-400+TC.
For me having f/6.3 vs f/8 makes a difference especially on the A6400 where I try and keep my ISOs a bit lower than on the A7R3 . I also like the internal zoom . If you were to use a tripod, nice that you can balance and not worry about extending the lens. Not sure if these would qualify as significant items for you or most .
I have only spent a small bit of time with the 200-600 since I just got it today. Will try and test it tomorrow with the 1.4TC on both the A6400 and the A7R3.