I should have removed the object in the lower left corner.
the 2 birds were under exposed. when I tried to increase the exposure in the software, I lost the highlights in the remaining real-state of the picture (jpeg).
A few photos from the garden taken in the last few days using the Z7 in dx mode and sigma 100-400mm. The sparrowhawk is an infrequent visitor and usually doesn't carch anything but this must have been its lucky day. Not so lucky for the blackbird.
Focus shift test in the backyard. I'm sure I'll use this feature more going forward considering how easy to use it is. Z6 + 24-70 2.8. 20 frames, stacked in PS.
the reason I am asking is because just about an hour ago I paid for the 500 pf
I still can call the local dealer to switch the money to the nikon 70-200 fl .
the reason I am asking is because just about an hour ago I paid for the 500 pf
I still can call the local dealer to switch the money to the nikon 70-200 fl .
Thanks
Omar
Hmm. I think the 70-200 *might* be sharper, but I really have not done back to back comparos. The reason being, when you need 500mm you need 500mm and 200mm just won't do, thus they are not really comparable, IMO. If you need 500mm, I would stick to the 500 PF as the 70-200 isn't long enough.
I’m a guessing this may have been discussed already but can anyone who has moved from the 24-70 f4s to the 24-70 2.8s comment on your experience?
From what I am seeing the 24-70 2.8s looks like a real winner that would be worth building a FF Z system around and compliment with my existing e glass sometime in the future as I would still live in both ecosystems.
If I’ve missed a thread on this feel free to point me to it. Thx.
. 
