JohnJ Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
OntheRez wrote:
If I have this right, you used some sort of older 6x6 camera and exotic lens (brands?), went thru a lengthly development process including developing the film, finding paper, enlarging, and finally "printing." (BTW, nice print). Then you used a digital Sony to take a pix of it, developed that, and posted it here. I think I have the process correct.
I'm not trying to be snarky or anything, but I am truly confused. I mean a woman, or man, can pursue their art/craft as they wish so long as they hurt no one, but why do it, if you end up where you started? I shot a fair amount of film over a number of years. Never had any color. Two, well three, things stand out in my memory: (1) Everytime I pushed the button, it cost money, (2) It was a long time before I got feedback, i.e., saw what happened, and (3) Working in a stinky darkroom wasn't all that much fun.
Back in grad school I had access to the university darkrooms which was nice, but still… I can remember months I'd stand there going, "Film, Ramen? Film, Ramen?" Having said all that, the one thing digital can't do is analog; dots don't make waves. In color there's so much data that the eye isn't bothered by lack of gradation, but in B&W? Actually, it's not B&W but grey and way more than 50 shades. Still, the laborous and expensive process of going back to film to return to digital just doesn't seem worth the small improvement, at least to me.
I guess the bottom line is that for you it's fun, and woe be it to me to rain on any parades, still… ...Show more →
I agree with you unless the point is to display a finished bw or colour print.
Also, Cibachrome prints have a unique look about them, though I doubt this process is even still available, but they are certainly worth the price/effort.
|