Wesley Perrault wrote: rattymouse wroteWesley Perrault wroteDid this die on the vine?Sure seems like it.Bummer! Was excited to see it.
Ok, I'll bite.. Besides the large size and weight, what issues do you have that aren't addressed with current offerings that are addressed by the Zeiss?
akashyap wrote:
In camera editing seems so forced. I'd rather use my hypothetical 6 inch edge to edge screen and the latest processor in it. You're telling me people can't wait the ~minute it takes to transfer photos onto a phone for the much more enjoyable experience? You can sit around a cafe during lunch or dinner editing on a phone instead of this behemoth of a camera. Only advantage would be to edit IMMEDIATELY after taking the photo to upload, and now you're clacking around on your camera in a probably poor LCD viewing area when you could be taking more pictures.
Give me a NFC touch to transfer over LR, and whatever wifi capabilities this is supposed to have. I'm baffled by the product team here.
In built storage is nice though, I forgot my SD card last weekend. But 512 SSD??...Show more →
I think it was a novel idea and maybe not for us but on some level perhaps the deep pockets media could possibly find it useful.
Getting immediate and better quality images transferred quicker to their news outlets or maybe one of the instagramers who are making hundreds of thousands of dollars from Instagram with millions of followers could probably justify it easily.
However there will be others a a fraction of the price that can do the same before very long.
But as far as for photographers unless you are talking about improving the image from a exposure, white balance, auto this or that any further editing for a finished product is going to have to be done on a computer or screen at a minimum.
If all you want are instant transfers use your iPhone xMax or other.
I expect it is only a matter of time and very soon before we can transfer images easily from regular cameras then we an do the basic and even some semi advanced on our phone or tablet and send them.
If it is something I care about it will be done in LR & PS on my computer.
Sorry for the pessimism. I sincerely wish Zeiss could get through with ZX1. But maybe optical company making niche camera is not a good omen if new technology is developed. What is new and novel in ZX1 might have had better chance in a larger mid/upper market product where the cost of development could be spread onto a very large amount of units produced and sold. You listen to us Sony?
This interview with the Senior Product Manager of Zeiss was just a few months ago, highly doubt they would have scrapped the entire project so quickly..
A lot of times in today's connected world it really is a matter of shooting, quickly editing and sharing they could be onto something if they can get the efficiency of the mobile phone os right. Fuji started their camera system with a fixed lens camera so we will see!
I always wondered if the wee screen was color-managed. I mean, they would need a really small I1 calibrator, the application and a small central surface on the LCD to place it on. Can I use my custom gamut profiles on it? (Not unless Adobe approves!) And we also need a DSLR-style focusing loupe to block out ambient light to prevent high mountain glare while editing. I don't wish them well at all. This is a corporate LARP from one of the few high end manual lens producers. Their managers need to look up the definition of 'opportunity cost'.
They tied up some really gifted people who might otherwise have produced a MILC version of the (no doubt) wonderful 35/2 that sits on this shelf-wasting white elephant. The (three month old) interview has some real tells in it:
Q: "You really seem to want photographers to do everything on the camera itself - shooting, reviewing, editing and uploading. Is that correct?"
A: "For this *concept*, yes. A photographer might still *carry a more capable DSLR* for an assignment.."
Q: "Previous attempts at this kind of product failed for a lot of reasons - how have you addressed the weaknesses of those earlier cameras?"
A: "*Well first let’s talk about* ... optimization around Android."
Classic deflection attempt. The beguiled interviewer thinks 'it could be said that Zeiss has nothing to lose'. So: a 'concept camera' that accompanies a 'more capable DSLR' (remember them?) to remote zones for which fixes of 'weaknesses' cannot be readily discussed, but for which DPR says the maker has 'nothing to lose'.
I can see the long queue of would-be (35mm FL only) remote guys from here, CCs in hand. They should call it the Zeiss Edsel.
SAR posted that based on a server error that has since been fixed.
Maybe they just tested the reaction?
Anyway ZX1 is a very marginal camera - if it ever becomes available. The fate of ZX1 should not affect Sony's decisions on the future of RX1 line. I think there is a community of photographers who would warmly wellcome RX1m3 if it has at least some of improvements discussed in this forum
tuomkok wrote: kosmiq wroteNah. Page is not removed and works right now: https://zx1.zeiss.com/
SAR posted that based on a server error that has since been fixed.Maybe they just tested the reaction?
Anyway ZX1 is a very marginal camera - if it ever becomes available. The fate of ZX1 should not affect Sony's decisions on the future of RX1 line. I think there is a community of photographers who would warmly wellcome RX1m3 if it has at least some of improvements discussed in this forum
I have had both the RX1R II which I returned as the tech is too old to have $3,200 tied up and it does not have a flash. Too limited with not so hot AF and fixed 35mm despite how wonderful the lens is.
I currently have the RXR1 but finding myself using my a7rIII and 35 2.8 or a6500 instead.
The only way I can justify a III is state-of-the-art AF, a 60+MP sensor to crop to 75mm and a flash so it can do double duty for me. Currently I use a a6500 and 20m or RX100V for point and shoots but would love to have a professional quality point and shoot. Events, group shots at restaurants and the like.
I would use the camera fifty percent as a point and 50 percent when I did not feel like carrying a full rig with me which is often.
I thought the same and wrote to the Zeiss support if the camera development has been stopped...The answer was, that the „Launch off the first digital camera still needs testing” and that they ask for a little more patience. The exact launch they would communicate in time.....let’s see!
I'm just not interested in spending a lot of money to be stuck 35mm fl. Great FL, but I could probably get uwa to tele, in some MILC or DSLR system for the price of this.