I think the concept of a compact, fixed-lens FF camera with integrated LR is an awesome one, I just thought that the design was... hideous. Being primed for instant sharing on social media is exactly what camera makers need to stop the current young (and older, truthfully) generation from just using their IPhone for everything.
If it were styled more like the Fuji X100 line, or like a beautiful Ikon ZM, and less like something out of a bad Doctor Who episode, I suspect it would have gotten a more favorable reception.
Price and size/weight are also serious concerns, but Sony already proved that people will spring for an RX1, so there's DEFINITELY a market for a high-end fixed-lens camera in a moderately sized package, assuming it can deliver the goods where it counts.
It looks like the ZX1 will have a great 35/2 lens but we still don't know how it would perform against the Sonnar 35/2. Higher resolution/contrast, smooth rendering?
The #1 question we ALL want to know 35/2 vs 35/2. Otherwise I am more than happy the ZX1 is finally showing some signs of life. No idea if the ZX1 will make it or not or somewhere inbetween. The ZX1concept is IMO, the tipping point to what comes next in the digital camera evolution, revolution if you will.
Fred Miranda wrote:
It looks like the ZX1 will have a great 35/2 lens but we still don't know how it would perform against the Sonnar 35/2. Higher resolution/contrast, smooth rendering?
LBJ2 wrote:
The #1 question we ALL want to know 35/2 vs 35/2. Otherwise I am more than happy the ZX1 is finally showing some signs of life. No idea if the ZX1 will make it or not or somewhere inbetween. The ZX1concept is IMO, the tipping point to what comes next in the digital camera evolution, revolution if you will.
I'm much more interested in the ZX1 concept than the lens. Really interested in how smooth the flow will be from image -> LR -> social media.
I was really hoping it would look a bit more premium in real life photos but man, this is lazy. The USB port is sticking out like a sore thumb. No flap or cover for the barest of dust or weather sealing. The tripod screw could also easily been some variation of black or yellow. I mean you made everything else that color, why stop there?
naturephoto1 wrote:
I am really surprised that Zeiss hasn't just let this have a quiet death and left it at that.
chez wrote: LBJ2 wroteThe #1 question we ALL want to know 35/2 vs 35/2. Otherwise I am more than happy the ZX1 is finally showing some signs of life. No idea if the ZX1 will make it or not or somewhere inbetween. The ZX1concept is IMO, the tipping point to what comes next in the digital camera evolution, revolution if you will.I'm much more interested in the ZX1 concept than the lens. Really interested in how smooth the flow will be from image -> LR -> social media.
Expect monthly software updates otherwise it shortly won’t be able to properly work with any of the “social media” du jour.
Of course they realized that no one (except perhaps an handful of bored millionaires or one of their sons) will buy this camera. It was a design study - they showed it to the public to see if there was enough interest to produce it - there wasn't - done.
I will stop by the Carl Zeiss Booth at PhotoPlus in NYC on October 24 to see if they have a working version available to hold and handle and see if there is any update. Last year they just had a number of cameras in cases not available to handle or hold.
But, I have no intention of purchasing one of these when and if they are released.
rattymouse wrote: carlitos wroteIt is instructive for Sony, Nikon, et al. as well. In fact, it probably saves them some R&D costs.Not Nikon. They had their own still born fixed lens cameras. R & D money down the drain.
I don’t know, I enjoy my Coolpix A. But I bought it refurbished for $350. Well worth that price.