fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              48              50       end
  

Archive 2018 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread

  
 
AndereObjektiv
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #1 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


z7 otus 85

https://i.imgur.com/ktvg6LD.jpg




Dec 27, 2019 at 06:54 PM
Steve Spencer
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #2 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


Here are a few from a visit to the park with my son using the Voigtlander 50 f/1.2 (first two) and the Voigtlander 65 f/2 APO Macro (all the rest) on the Z7.



























Dec 27, 2019 at 08:49 PM
AndereObjektiv
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #3 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


SMC Pentax 67 F4 55mm on Z7

https://i.imgur.com/HdfNUVd.jpg



Dec 28, 2019 at 04:48 PM
AndereObjektiv
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #4 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


One more from today, recomposed and enlarged:

SMC Pentax 67 55mm F4 on Z7 @f/16

https://i.imgur.com/qEa0GYG.jpg



Dec 28, 2019 at 10:53 PM
mapgraphs
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #5 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


Z7, Voigtländer VM 75mm f/1.5 Nokton

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48707489693_dc44bb0d0c_h.jpg


https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48707865016_87c24d1c54_h.jpg



Dec 29, 2019 at 09:22 AM
mapgraphs
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #6 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


Z7, 7Artisans M 50mm f/1.1 @ f/1.1

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48426439702_e7f6416ddb_h.jpg



Jan 06, 2020 at 06:12 PM
zhangyue
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #7 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


I still have a few Z prime but sold the body.
Does anybody know that latest Nikon Z firmware update anything good for adapting lens?
Such as Focus confirmation for non chipped glass? Will dumb manual lens focal length be recorded in EXIF etc...?




Feb 27, 2020 at 02:23 PM
frezeiss
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #8 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread



Michael, f money wanst an issue, which is the best for M lenses. Z6, Z7 or SL-1? I've got my autofocus covered with the Sony's, hate to see my Milvus and M lenses collecting dust..



Jun 11, 2020 at 02:32 AM
zhangyue
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #9 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


frezeiss wrote:
Michael, f money wanst an issue, which is the best for M lenses. Z6, Z7 or SL-1? I've got my autofocus covered with the Sony's, hate to see my Milvus and M lenses collecting dust..


For M lens, I never used SL1 but SL2 definitely offer roughly 0.5~1 stop benefit in term of corner sharpness depend on m glasses compare to Z and you get even more compare to Sony.

SL2 is better than SL in one area with IBIS. For me the most incentive to shoot SL1/2 is eco system Leica offer for M R and S glasses because I have all and then Sigma's AF glasses offer really good performance and value. I never see any WA zoom perform in 14-24 level. sigma's 24-70 and Panasonic's 70-200 f4 are also so good that I am kind of covered for my landscape and travel need as well.

If not that, I will have a really hard time recommend SL1/2 over Z if you don't consider prime build quality as a plus. I like Z very much and still do. I still have FTZ and a few Nikon S primes as they are so good and I really enjoy using them. I sold Z7 because I don't want it depreciate on shelf without use it much after SL2 but TBH, for a small AF package, Z is a better choice for sure so I will be back.

If you don't need adapt more than a few M glass or most of them are not SWA or you have no intention to try f1.8S AF glass, I see little gain to use Nikon Z. (it is a better M platform but still not a home run). For Milvus, you have many option to use them on Sony with dumb or smart adapter. If you ask me for anyone shooting duel system, having Nikon and Sony make little sense, but shoot either Leica M/SL with Sony OR Nikon make a lot more sense

Of course, if you want some fun to shooting different systems, buy those (either SL or Z) 2nd hand and enjoy sell them if they do not meet your expectation



Jun 11, 2020 at 11:53 AM
frezeiss
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #10 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


Michael,
Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation. It has me tipping towards the SL cameras since this will only be my manual focus lens camera, the nicer EVF and better M performance seals it for me.

Just want to say, I follow your post regarding the Z in the alt & nikon forums, very insightful and the photos were always lovely. I do admit the Z has imo a nicer color rendering compared to the Sony gen. III cameras. Thanks again!



Jun 11, 2020 at 10:04 PM
zhangyue
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #11 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


I'd like bring this thread back to give update from Alt forum member point of view.

First, a few rants.

After Z6II and Z7II officially hit the market, I bought back Z6. Why, because I now know next Z7/6 looks like, I feel Z6 is a better buy for me. I have to say I am quite disappoint to see how Z6/7II looks like after almost three years. Nikon pretty much take direction that pushed by youtuber and internet noise. Many may finally feel good about how Z7/6 now, but aren't they good three years ago?

At that time, they are quite special to my eyes because I don't have any unreasonable expectation to first generation MILC based on my sony experience. It is quite a surprise for me that Nikon nailed most spec right. They are still very capable even now. I can't believe how many good images I took a few years back with Z7 after briefly browse this thread. but after three years, in this state, I personally think it is inadequate. It is so predictable without any surprising. 3 years ago, Z is quite special but now I have to say it is uninspiring. You almost feel they lose confidence themselves that give up their original believe and their product can be predicted now: add 2nd card, add battery grip, improve AF.... bla bla bla....What is next, add battery capacity?

If they want success, they can't be predicable, they can't just follow the path. they need break ground. I don't see that. This is quite sad. I think Nikon need replace all their management who charged their product cycle IMHO to give the company a new life.

Rant over.

I get Z6 back, maybe I should have got a Z7 but my system change quite a bit in past few years. SL2 will take the role Z7 had because they can take m, S and L glasses for better system integration. SL2's high resolution mode is a real deal for pixel pp. I also have a lot more choice for AF glass selection such as Sigma i-series. Sigma's zoom is very good. For travel, they perform as good as Nikon Z. SL don't AF as good, but this is not important for my use. Remember I feel Z7 was the best MILC camera three years ago. Now, I think I can't say the same.

The EVF of Nikon is still great, forget about spec sheet. It is very analog looking VF. AF is a joy. Single SQD card is preferred. I never put two card in any of my camera anyway. I also like the fact it is few tens of g less than version II. Ergo is great as before, with smallRig plate, this is still the best handhold feeling camera I ever used. With other system around, I do wish it offer more programmability on button so that I can match body from each other. Nikon is the least friendly compare to FUJI, Panasonic/Leica in this regard. Using 28/58/105 on Z is main reason I bought Z. It turn out I can't leave without 28/58 and I am look forward to 105.

From alt forum POV, the Z doesn't change much. My complain list on the very first of this thread pretty much unchanged.

1. There is no AF-D support. this is unacceptable. Sony even offered one for their A mount. Nikon have much wider users base than Sony. especially consider they have few superb AFD glasses such as 28 85 105 135 AFD.
2. No EXIF record for dumb adapter even you enter NON CPU lens manually. This is bad for Leica M or any other systems user adapt lens on Nikon. So they don't expect user will adapt classic lenses on their MILC body? where is the FUN factor in their system? This is only a line of code and maybe three minute software job to fix it. Unacceptable.
3. No option to select focus aperture: say you can select "always focus WO" as DSLR (assume so many SLR user base), or you can select f2.8 focus for small aperture to speed up focus and avoid focus shift problem or you can select focus at shooting aperture smaller f5.6 to inspect sun star, DOF etc.. None of above offered.
4. No focus confirmation for dumb adapter. I no longer miss this feature as much as I did given I use a lot less SLR these days but it is one of feature I love about Nikon.
5. No focus mode change on fly. Say if face/eye focus failed, go back to center focus so at least you can get the shot quickly etc.. Leica and Panasonic did this so naturally without you do anything.
6. AF can still be stubborn that focus background without come back.
7. when in magnified view, half press shutter will not bring back full view, you have to hit whichever button brought that view again to go back normal. What? None of camera I used behave like this, Sony, Panasonic, Leica Fuji Sigma you name it.

As you can see, there is really not much changed since its introduction. Small things like these will warm customer heart and get you their support. I don't know what they are doing. It is acceptable 3 years ago that they need time to market but not at this time for me.

Again, the view point is mainly from alt forum background. For most Z users, It is fine as is.

I don't dare to post it in Nikon forum but I will be a Nikon user forever as long as 58g still work.


Edited on Jan 21, 2021 at 04:39 PM · View previous versions



Jan 21, 2021 at 02:14 PM
CVickery
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #12 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


zhangyue wrote:
I'd like bring this thread back to give update from Alt forum member point of view.

First, a few rants.

After Z6II and Z7II officially hit the market, I bought back Z6. Why, because I now know next Z7/6 looks like, I feel Z6 is a better buy for me. I have to say I am quite disappoint to see how Z6/7II looks like after almost three years. Nikon pretty much take direction that pushed by youtuber and internet noise. Many may finally feel good about how Z7/6 now, but aren't they good three years ago?

At that time, they
...Show more

Good comments Michael. Like you I was an early adopter of the Z cameras (Z7) but I kept mine. For me, the Z7 still meets my requirements and the version II upgrades are not compelling. Nikon has spent the last 3 years filling out the lens line as well as the lower end Z50 and Z5 bodies, but now that the higher end lenses are all shipping Nikon really needs the Z8/9 to generate some excitement for the brand.



Jan 21, 2021 at 03:11 PM
zhangyue
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #13 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


CVickery wrote:
Good comments Michael. Like you I was an early adopter of the Z cameras (Z7) but I kept mine. For me, the Z7 still meets my requirements and the version II upgrades are not compelling. Nikon has spent the last 3 years filling out the lens line as well as the lower end Z50 and Z5 bodies, but now that the higher end lenses are all shipping Nikon really needs the Z8/9 to generate some excitement for the brand.


Yes, I agree with you. It is nothing wrong with both Z6/7II. Just I feel as Nikon, they shouldn't settle down this way, it is so passive and in a defensive way.

Internet is weird that 3 years ago, Z actually stand better position IMHO. I truly believe Z7 is the best body at that time. However, Z seems always heavily influenced by Sony's approach so is the upgrade path. I mentioned originally in this thread. The body remind me of alpha 7. If you look Canon, Panasonic, Fuji, they all have their take on MILC, and you see they keep their legacy. Somehow, Z is losing that I feel. I think SL type of Z with D850 type of AF will warrant a success for Nikon customers. Leica's SL2 and SL2-S, Panasonic S1R and S1 approach was the one that so many Nikon customers wanted, they want 24M sports D8xx body like D700 was, but Nikon (bean countered the profit) never did it and they also never have the glory day of D300/D700/D3. Their share of market was keep down from there.

I look forward to Nikon's Z8/9. I hope it surprise me and Nikon desperately need surprise me or market. One strick of body is all that takes to bring back glory. A mis step will deep the gap.



Jan 22, 2021 at 12:29 PM
mapgraphs
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #14 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


A Voigtländer VM 28mm Nokton would fill the gap for me. ...Z7, Voigtländer VM 21mm f/1.8 Ultron


Tavern, landing



Jan 22, 2021 at 04:55 PM
AdaptedLenses
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #15 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


Old post, still like the lens on the Z? Been thinking about picking one up along with the 75/1.25.

rsolti13 wrote:
Some more with the Z6 and Z7 7Artisans M 28 f/1.4 ASPH FE Plus

https://photos.smugmug.com/Landscape/Savannah-Downtown/i-T8phgRg/0/d9e9b50a/X3/NZ6_1041-X3.jpg

https://photos.smugmug.com/Landscape/Savannah-Downtown/i-TjtBTF5/0/ea60945f/X3/NZ6_1045-X3.jpg

https://photos.smugmug.com/Landscape/Savannah-Downtown/i-Hm6RMWz/0/7e4ad67c/X3/NZ6_1046-X3.jpg




Jan 25, 2021 at 08:26 PM
AdaptedLenses
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #16 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


Fair points in general and I agree on several of the items that should be simple fixes. But I don’t think it’s quite fair to say that the Z’s are unacceptable in the current market. Sure there are better but what does it compare too? The R6? I’ve used it and don’t feel the Z6II gives up much of anything in general. The A7III? The older Sony is a bit cheaper but has a lower res EVF, and it’s AF is faster but it’s shutter feels a good bit less responsive so I’m not sure it’s a real advantage. The S5, priced the same and Nikon arguably has a better lens stable and ergonomics. Not to mention some nifty tricks like a 900 second shutter and the all around good camera the Z6 was.

Nikon maybe needs an A9/R6 competitor but those aren’t bread and butter products, those are niche products. Nikon basically said they’re focusing on bread and butter first which is a Grey strategy IMO, even if it leaves enthusiasts a bit disappointed. But A9II’s and exotic lenses are never going to be sales leaders.

But man I wish they’d offer an AF-D adapter and save Non-CPU lens data with anything. The Df can do it with non-AI (ie zero info from a lens) so it’s inexcusable...

zhangyue wrote:
I'd like bring this thread back to give update from Alt forum member point of view.

First, a few rants.

After Z6II and Z7II officially hit the market, I bought back Z6. Why, because I now know next Z7/6 looks like, I feel Z6 is a better buy for me. I have to say I am quite disappoint to see how Z6/7II looks like after almost three years. Nikon pretty much take direction that pushed by youtuber and internet noise. Many may finally feel good about how Z7/6 now, but aren't they good three years ago?

At that time, they
...Show more



Jan 25, 2021 at 08:38 PM
zhangyue
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #17 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


AdaptedLenses wrote:
Fair points in general and I agree on several of the items that should be simple fixes. But I don’t think it’s quite fair to say that the Z’s are unacceptable in the current market. Sure there are better but what does it compare too? The R6? I’ve used it and don’t feel the Z6II gives up much of anything in general. The A7III? The older Sony is a bit cheaper but has a lower res EVF, and it’s AF is faster but it’s shutter feels a good bit less responsive so I’m not sure it’s a real advantage. The
...Show more

No worry If your expectation for Nikon is just work and works fine. Then, I agree. My expectation for Nikon or for Z is different. Z7 was really pretty good. With D850 on hand 3 years ago and with Z7 nice build and ergo with superb IQ, Nikon is in a great position to start.

I am happy with Z6/7 as is, what I am not happy is seeing How Nikon get pushed around for Z6/7II update. This is too passive and not gonna work in current situation. that is a mis-step in management for R&D resource if you ask my opinion. I don't think anyone have the luxury to missing momentum like this. They should just let Z6/7 alone, introduce Z8/Z9 at the time frame of Z6/7II. and I see issues here. My expectation is too high maybe.

For photography itself, Camera meet my standard long time ago. However, real world is not like that. Just saying.



Jan 26, 2021 at 01:27 PM
AdaptedLenses
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #18 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


It's true the Z6II is a fine camera for my needs, but it's not that I think it's fine, it's that I think Nikon's approach is a smart one. The Z7 Z7II is still a very competitive camera in a large niche, and the Z6 / Z6II is even more competitive in an even larger niche. Yes they're missing the R5 and now A1 competitor but those are tiny niches. They're looking to establish sales rather than chase halo bodies.

Look at Canon for instance. They have the R5 which is excellent but it's almost $1000 more than the Z7II. They have the R6 but its $500 more and uses a decade old sensor with some tweaks.

I agree they need to get a Z8/9 or Z1 or whatever it'll be called released, but I also agree with their priorities to date. Same expectations, different orders.

zhangyue wrote:
No worry If your expectation for Nikon is just work and works fine. Then, I agree. My expectation for Nikon or for Z is different. Z7 was really pretty good. With D850 on hand 3 years ago and with Z7 nice build and ergo with superb IQ, Nikon is in a great position to start.

I am happy with Z6/7 as is, what I am not happy is seeing How Nikon get pushed around for Z6/7II update. This is too passive and not gonna work in current situation. that is a mis-step in management for R&D resource if you
...Show more




Jan 26, 2021 at 01:39 PM
zhangyue
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #19 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


AdaptedLenses wrote:
It's true the Z6II is a fine camera for my needs, but it's not that I think it's fine, it's that I think Nikon's approach is a smart one. The Z7 Z7II is still a very competitive camera in a large niche, and the Z6 / Z6II is even more competitive in an even larger niche. Yes they're missing the R5 and now A1 competitor but those are tiny niches. They're looking to establish sales rather than chase halo bodies.

Look at Canon for instance. They have the R5 which is excellent but it's almost $1000 more than the Z7II. They
...Show more

The question is who will upgrade to Z6/7II? Youtuber? Nikon trasher who laugh at missing two card and grip? I bought Z6 after seeing z6/7II and I am very price insensitive buyer,(at least in this range) go figure. It really offer almost zero incentive to me or many people to upgrade. (Sure, I know I know wedding pro want two card. )

What make people think current Z is preferred over Sony or Canon if original Z didn't grab enough market share three years ago? I honestly think Nikon could have done better IMHO.

Other than listed small issues in my list, Z6 is still a very enjoyable camera as Z7. I love it but will market love it as much as I do



Jan 26, 2021 at 02:19 PM
AdaptedLenses
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #20 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


It’s not only who will upgrade but what Nikon users will now switch. I agree the Z6 is still a great camera and at 1600 vs 2000 that’s probably an appropriate discount. But there’s not a huge reason to sell the Z6 for a Z6II, but to me anyway that doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a place. Full featured grip, better AF, two slots, a few shooting niceties, maybe they should have been in the Z6 but they’re still useful and important for some.

As far as who will pick it? Well like I said Nikon migraters might take a longer look. And I’ve used the A7III and RIII long term and tried the R6 and S6 and the Z6II is a better camera than any of those alternatives frankly (except the RIII) And of you wanted a 2k body what would you buy? Not the EOS R or the S1 alternatives. The A7III is the only maybe if you just read the Internet but I’ve already given my opinion it’s a less enjoyable camera. The Z6 for 1600 is plenty for most, but the Z6II at its price is still one of the best choices on the market. Nikon could do better sure, but it would cost more etc.

To be honest I think it’s because you’re price insensitive that you feel they missed. I’m guessing you’d happily pay 2500-3000 for a Z6II with a spec sheet closer to an R5. But that won’t move nearly as many units for Nikon which puts them in a paradoxically worse position. Those cameras will come and it’s time for Nikon to raise the bar, but their business plan is to ensure they have sales to chase those products.

zhangyue wrote:
The question is who will upgrade to Z6/7II? Youtuber? Nikon trasher who laugh at missing two card and grip? I bought Z6 after seeing z6/7II and I am very price insensitive buyer,(at least in this range) go figure. It really offer almost zero incentive to me or many people to upgrade. (Sure, I know I know wedding pro want two card. )

What make people think current Z is preferred over Sony or Canon if original Z didn't grab enough market share three years ago? I honestly think Nikon could have done better IMHO.

Other than listed small issues in
...Show more



Jan 26, 2021 at 07:38 PM
1       2       3              48              50       end




FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              48              50       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account