Red Marx
Offline
•
Upload & Sell: Off
|
 p.18 #11 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II | |
Ubtree wrote:
I have been waiting for the launch of the 6D MkII before deciding on a replacement for my 5D MkII.
When launched, the 5D seemed to have been designed with the landscape photographer in mind, but the introduction of video to the 5D MkII changed its nature, and the MkIV has more bells and whistles than I need. So for me, it could be that it would be sensible to move from the 5DMk II to a 6D MkII, rather than to a 5D MKIV.
I have therefore been comparing the detailed specifications of the 6D MkII and the 5D MkIV, and thought that others might find the comparison useful.
The results are as follows:
Sensor:
26.2 MP (vs. 30.4 MP)
(With pixels 12% larger, there is potential for wider dynamic range.)
Maximum ISO:
40,000 (vs. 32,000)
Maximum shutter speed:
1/4000 (vs. 1/8000)
AF points:
45 (vs. 61), and confined to the central area of the image.
Exposure meter:
7,560 pixels (vs. 150,000)
Exposure control :
Extended range of special scene modes
LCD monitor:
3.0 inch (vs. 3.2 inch)
1.04 million pixels (vs. 1.62 million pixels)
Articulating
No anti-reflection coating
Shutter time lag between simultaneous SW-1/SW-2 ON and start of exposure:
250ms (vs. 130ms)
Additional drive mode:
Self-timer: Continuous shooting (after 10-sec., 2 to 10 shots)
Viewfinder information:
* Grid
* Aspect Ratio Line
but no:
* Dual Pixel RAW setting
* Digital Lens Optimizer
* White balance
* AF status indicator
Battery life:
Approx. 30% longer
Start-up time:
0.2 sec (vs. 0.1 sec)
Dimensions:
5.93 x 4.58 x 2.99 in. / 150.7 x 116.4 x 75.9mm
vs. 5.67 x 4.35 x 2.94 in. / 144.0 x 110.5 x 74.8mm
Weight :
890g / 31.39 oz vs. 765g / 26.98 oz
Note: I have excluded the controversial video specifications, which have already been discussed at length.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other than surprise at how few differences there are, the key points for me are:
- The 6D obviously has a lower resolution, and I would be happy to accept 26 MP in exchange for increased dynamic range.
- The maximum ISO could be useful for early morning / late evening shots.
- I would rarely (if ever) need 1/8000 shutter speed.
- The number of AF points is reasonable, but their spread is disappointing. This is not a problem for landscape work, but poor for general use.
- The difference in the number of exposure meter pixels seems astounding. I don’t know much about this topic (is Canon was quoting an incorrect figure?), but if the figures are correct, it suggests that the 5D MKIV’s exposure control would be considerably more sophisticated. Exposure control is less critical for me, since I check the histogram on most exposures as soon as I have made them, but it’s certainly worth considering further.
- The articulating screen is a very big plus point (for taking macro shots of plants, etc. when out in the landscape). It is surprising that Canon did not apply a non-reflective coating ( - once could say, a glaring omission!
 ), but this can be addressed by using a screen protector).
- Reduced weight is always welcome, but a 10% reduction in the camera/lens combination (and a 3% reduction in the total pack weight that I would be carrying) will not sway my purchasing decision.
At the end of the day, I think that the dynamic range will be the deciding factor for me, and so I’ll be waiting until that information becomes available before making a decision....Show more →
Thank you for taking the time to illustrate many of the differences between the 6D Mark II and the 5D Mark IV.
I wanted to address a few things from your post. Regarding the exposure meter comment that you made, I believe you'll find the answer to whether or not it was a typographical error on Canon's part of you look at the exposure meter for the 80D.
I'm confused by your statement of white balance not being available in the 6D Mark II. In the viewfinder? Anywhere? Are you implying that only the 5D Mark IV has AWB-W?
One missing item on your list is x-sync speed.
Thank you again for taking the time to create a comparison. Also, thank you for omitting the video aspects. :-)
|
