BrandonSi wrote:
GMPhotography wrote
From my casual reading of the Jupiter i picked up on the bokeh , flare are not as good as the Zeiss which he seems to love more. Not sure about it myself as even at 650 its not that far away from a used Zeiss which i like the output better. That was my issue with the Jupiter 3+.. Why would I pay $650 for anything made by lomography.com, and especially when the actual Zeiss lens can be had for $150-$200 more?
Maybe if it was $200-$250 I could see it..
yeah, the original j-3 is worth it's price ($150), but this new version seems way over priced – the coatings still aren't great and it doesn't have the improved performance that the zm does due to zeiss's design tweaks.