Okay found one 67mm filter. So step up to 67mm one filter ring than the hood and still no vignetting. No question you should be able to stack two filters at 67mm
naturephoto1 wrote: GMPhotography wrote67mm works . Give me a second Ill have it upI would expect that anyone using the Lee 100mm filter system could use a step up ring to 67mm to use as many as 4? filters on the Loxia 21mm.
Rich
My bet you would be correct. 67mm is a nice filter size especially if you also shoot Batis glass as they are 67mm
GMPhotography wrote: ecarlino wroteGuy - looking at that mess, you practically have collected one for each of the lenses you've owned in the past year :-) your probably right too. Too funny
i am very curious to hear your feedback on the Sigma adapter and 35 Art b/c the Sigma 20 Art could be interesting (if it wasn't such a beast) since i've given up on the Lox21 (but i'm really hoping the Batis 18 is excellent) - the long end Sigmas could be great, particularly the 150 or 180 APO marcros (but that would require those to be updated to work with the adapter)
Yea hope to get that adapter really soon. I was thinking of offering to members if they want to send me there sigma lens for a day or 2 to make sure it's all working I can do that.
Ookay...so I would shove in 52 -> 77mm step-up ring and use a pile 'o 77mm filters with ease.
But for the fun, I think I will try to use ultra slim cpl and file off threads from an already slim Haida ND if I get my hands on this 21mm thing. Just to use that nice lenshood.
"The Loxia 21/2.8 has become my favorite lens on the Sony A7R II for the outdoors, where manual focus is quick and hyper accurate at 12.5X. Its diminutive size and low weight make carrying the camera a pleasant experience compared to a much bulkier and heavier Nikon D810 + Zeiss 21/2.8."
rji2goleez wrote:
From Digilloyd's most recent post:
"The Loxia 21/2.8 has become my favorite lens on the Sony A7R II for the outdoors, where manual focus is quick and hyper accurate at 12.5X. Its diminutive size and low weight make carrying the camera a pleasant experience compared to a much bulkier and heavier Nikon D810 + Zeiss 21/2.8."
I have to agree!
More than just agree. Fantastic combo plus the 50 in the corner pocket. Lol
GMPhotography wrote: rji2goleez wroteFrom Digilloyd's most recent post:
"The Loxia 21/2.8 has become my favorite lens on the Sony A7R II for the outdoors, where manual focus is quick and hyper accurate at 12.5X. Its diminutive size and low weight make carrying the camera a pleasant experience compared to a much bulkier and heavier Nikon D810 + Zeiss 21/2.8."
I have to agree!More than just agree. Fantastic combo plus the 50 in the corner pocket. Lol
Last time I was in Yosemite, I had the Loxia 21/2.8 glued on the A7RII, RX1RII on my right pocket and Loxia 50/2 on the left. No bag!
Fred Miranda wrote: GMPhotography wroterji2goleez wroteFrom Digilloyd's most recent post:
"The Loxia 21/2.8 has become my favorite lens on the Sony A7R II for the outdoors, where manual focus is quick and hyper accurate at 12.5X. Its diminutive size and low weight make carrying the camera a pleasant experience compared to a much bulkier and heavier Nikon D810 + Zeiss 21/2.8."
I have to agree!More than just agree. Fantastic combo plus the 50 in the corner pocket. LolLast time I was in Yosemite, I had the Loxia 21/2.8 glued on the A7RII, RX1RII on my right pocket and Loxia 50/2 on the left. No bag!
Later this week, I'm going to try the same except it will be a Loxia Trilogy!
Fred Miranda wrote: GMPhotography wroterji2goleez wroteFrom Digilloyd's most recent post:
"The Loxia 21/2.8 has become my favorite lens on the Sony A7R II for the outdoors, where manual focus is quick and hyper accurate at 12.5X. Its diminutive size and low weight make carrying the camera a pleasant experience compared to a much bulkier and heavier Nikon D810 + Zeiss 21/2.8."
I have to agree!More than just agree. Fantastic combo plus the 50 in the corner pocket. LolLast time I was in Yosemite, I had the Loxia 21/2.8 glued on the A7RII, RX1RII on my right pocket and Loxia 50/2 on the left. No bag!
Now that's the way too shoot landscape work. Very little weight and bulk
Btw I bought a Tenba Copper 13 Slim bag in NY and this maybe the best shoulder bag I ever owned and I'm a bag whore. You can carry 5 lenses and body plus plus and it hugs your body. I walked miles with it and never ever felt the weight or bulk with it. Love it check it out they have a 8 size too for even smaller size
how many of you guys that love the Loxia 21 focus it at shooting aperture like Guy suggested?
that would make the user experience a lot more friendly - i got sick of having to go back and forth between f/2.8 and f/8 - because i thought focusing at f/8 would not be accurate enough. (i should mention i was walking around downtown Chicago and wanted as much in focus as possible but wasn't sure i should/could just leave it near infinity)
ecarlino wrote:
how many of you guys that love the Loxia 21 focus it at shooting aperture like Guy suggested?
that would make the user experience a lot more friendly - i got sick of having to go back and forth between f/2.8 and f/8 - because i thought focusing at f/8 would not be accurate enough. (i should mention i was walking around downtown Chicago and wanted as much in focus as possible but wasn't sure i should/could just leave it near infinity)
I've never considered focusing at anything other than shooting aperture in my use. I guess I would do it if I felt it necessary but I find focusing the lens rather straightforward, personally.
rji2goleez wrote: ecarlino wrotehow many of you guys that love the Loxia 21 focus it at shooting aperture like Guy suggested?
that would make the user experience a lot more friendly - i got sick of having to go back and forth between f/2.8 and f/8 - because i thought focusing at f/8 would not be accurate enough. (i should mention i was walking around downtown Chicago and wanted as much in focus as possible but wasn't sure i should/could just leave it near infinity)I've never considered focusing at anything other than shooting aperture in my use. I guess I would do it if I felt it necessary but I find focusing the lens rather straightforward, personally.
thanks for the feedback (love ALL of your photos btw)
this isn't a criticism of then, rather an admission of never having MF'd before and getting used to it.
i thought it was better to focus at f/2.8 and then set back to f/8 but it seems like more people are just focusing like you and Guy - so i need to give that a try.....
With focus peaking and 12x on it's really pretty easy. But it is a acquired taste and obviously if you where around back in the day that's all we had was manual focus. But interesting history here as we started getting AF bodies Nikon and Canon for instance they started to put focusing screens in more for AF than manual focusing and it got far worse to focus these AF cams because they took out the contrast screens and split focusing aids that helped tremendously with manual focus. So it got worse now Sony with live view we have different focusing AIDS that bring it all back to much easier manual focusing
ecarlino wrote: rji2goleez wroteecarlino wrotehow many of you guys that love the Loxia 21 focus it at shooting aperture like Guy suggested?
that would make the user experience a lot more friendly - i got sick of having to go back and forth between f/2.8 and f/8 - because i thought focusing at f/8 would not be accurate enough. (i should mention i was walking around downtown Chicago and wanted as much in focus as possible but wasn't sure i should/could just leave it near infinity)I've never considered focusing at anything other than shooting aperture in my use. I guess I would do it if I felt it necessary but I find focusing the lens rather straightforward, personally.thanks for the feedback (love ALL of your photos btw)
this isn't a criticism of then, rather an admission of never having MF'd before and getting used to it.
i thought it was better to focus at f/2.8 and then set back to f/8 but it seems like more people are just focusing like you and Guy - so i need to give that a try.....
As Guy mentions, it is an acquired taste. I was used to using MF when I shot Canon with Zeiss ZE lenses so the transition to Sony was easy. Focus Peaking and Live View (LCD) with up to 12x makes it easy to MF but it's still something to get used to if you've only used AF in the past. There are some who prefer MF over AF when critical focus is required. I like taking my time and the slower process gives me a chance to study my composition. At the same time, I can MF rather quickly when street shooting but it took some practice!