p.87 #4 · Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR
Will, with the 200-500 in group A/F, is there a difference between performance on the D810 and the D500? Using the D810, I haven't had the greatest luck w the correct point selecting when shooting small subjects such as this.
You can see I'm fishing for more ways to add the D500 to my kit! (The D810 stays too, what a dream it's been.) Oh, and yes... I love the heck out of my 200-500!
trenchmonkey wrote:
Still continue to be impressed by the D500's Group AF
~90% crop
p.87 #5 · Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR
trenchmonkey wrote:
Still continue to be impressed by the D500's Group AF
~90% crop
Birdbrooks wrote:
Will, with the 200-500 in group A/F, is there a difference between performance on the D810 and the D500? Using the D810, I haven't had the greatest luck w the correct point selecting when shooting small subjects such as this.
You can see I'm fishing for more ways to add the D500 to my kit! (The D810 stays too, what a dream it's been.) Oh, and yes... I love the heck out of my 200-500!
Howdy, Bill. The Group AF is indeed a step up from that of the D810. Covers a larger
area in the VF (but there's something else going on besides the differences w/ FX vs DX)
With the D810 I used it primarily when the target was clean, the D500 locks on with all
sorts of crap in the way...I love it. Happy 'fishing'
Happy 'fishing' 
