p.25 #1Zeiss "Batis" AF lens line to be released for FF E-mount
naturephoto1 wrote: Steve Spencer wrotephilip_pj wroteListening to Rich Schleuning, it is very clear this is just the start of a new line, one Zeiss are likely to put out ahead of the specialist Loxias, in which they originally promised five lenses.
It is only speculation, but Zeiss rarely do anything by half measures in 'own brand' lenses - Touit being the exception as Sony moves away from APS-C in this age of $1000 full frame bodies.
Contax Yashica had 30 lenses, ZEF around 11, ZM almost as many as that. All these ranges had very good spans with short separation, ZEF being the most recent had 15-18-21-25-28-35 (f1.4, f2)-50 (f1.4, f2)-85-100-135. Canon and Nikon are long lens specialists so Zeiss chased the 'enthusiast' focal lengths in ZEF, ZM stopped at 85.
Zeiss are big on common ergo and put considerable work into it with Batis. There are going to be just three Otus lenses, project 'halo' pro lenses if you will. They have now completed ZEF and ZM, so they have plenty of scope to develop full frame stills lenses in their favorite 135 format. They might be out to use FE as a vehicle and REALLY do the job well. Given a little time, of course. What if they duplicate the focal lengths in ZEF? The quality will not surprise, their latest lenses are 135/2 APO, Otus 55/85 and the hard to find Loxias.
Finally, AF zooms may enter the picture. The 35-70 still surprises after 20 years, can you say that about any contemporaneous Canon or Nikon zoom - no. They were noisy, clunky and heavy, hideous AF. No special anything in the CY either. Imagine a new version plus an 80-200/4.
Lacking C/N's range depth, Sony must be delighted.I think you are right that eventually the Batis line will be a full line, but not right away and it only makes sense to consider the Sony/Zeiss lenses as it develops. So what does that mean? In my view I think that means that the next lenses we can expect are something wider perhaps an 18mm f/2.8 or 3.5 (this has no Sony/Zeiss competition), something longer perhaps a 135mm f/2 or f/2.5 (this has no Sony/Zeiss E mount competition, but does have A mount competition). I would also expect a shorter macro perhaps a 60mm f/2 or f/2.8. Then I think the next obvious moves are for a 35 f/2 and a 50 f/1.4 (these have Sony/Zeiss competition at the focal length but not the aperture and Loxia competition for the 35 at both focal length and aperture and at 50 just at the focal length). This would give a Batis line of 18, 25, 35, 50, 60 (macro), 85, and 135. Not a bad line-up at all. Not quite complete, but all fairly different from the Sony/Zeiss offerings. To that if they could add a nice 24-85ish f/4 zoom, and perhaps a 400 f/4 (borrowing from their excellent Contax N designs), they could add a great deal of functionality to the FE mount and I think sell quite a few lenses without competing with the Sony/Zeiss lenses that are available. Of course they might leave some of these lenses to be developed by Sony and they might add a lens or two that do compete with Sony/Zeiss or Sony G offerings if the Sony lenses don't sell well or aren't up to expectations.
This Batis line has also led me to rethink the Loxia line. I think I was wrong in initially predicting the next three Loxia lenses would be a 18, 25, and 85. Given these Batis lenses, I would be very surprised if that happens. Instead I think all three lenses will be wider, where I think there is more demand from videographers. I also expect Zeiss to avoid competition with the Batis lenses where they can. So I would expect something like a 15 or 16mm fisheye, a 21mm, and a 28mm. This would give a Loxia line with a 15 or 16mm fisheye, a 21mm, a 28mm, a 35mm and a 50mm. That would go a long way toward providing solid lenses for video for the system and would keep their commitment of making 5 Loxia lenses.Hi Steve,
If you are correct, then it is quite likely that I will modify the sensor stack of my A7r and I will just continue to use my MF Leica M (and Minolta CLE 40mm f2 M-Rokkor) and Leica R lenses (and depending upon Doug Herr's [telyt] findings possibly a Canon 500mm f4.5L lens). I may totally bypass all of the Zeiss Loxia, Zeiss Batis, and Sony AF lenses at least for quite some time. I just hope that the newer and future Sony FE FF bodies will be able to have their Sensor's modified with a thin filter stack as Kolari is able to do with the A7, A7r, and A7s cameras.
Rich...Show more →
I am right with you, Rich. I too am hoping that Kolari can modify future cameras. Right now I am very happy with my A7II and I hope they can modify that camera. If they can, then I will have enough confidence that they can modify future cameras. In my case, however, I will probably wait a bit longer and let my wife build her kit with Sony/ Zeiss and Batis lenses while I use my ZEs. In time though I fully expect to get a modified camera and move to mostly Leica M mount glass.
p.25 #4Zeiss "Batis" AF lens line to be released for FF E-mount
Oh, yes! I was hoping both the Batis 85mm and 25mm woudn't be somewhat underperforming, so I could justify not buying an OTUS 85, and letting my Elmarit R 28mm go.
p.25 #6Zeiss "Batis" AF lens line to be released for FF E-mount
Lloyd seems to be quite impressed:
"The Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 Sonnar rocks. What a gorgeous lens (the Zeiss Batis 25/2 also). MUST HAVES for Sony shooters."
p.25 #12Zeiss "Batis" AF lens line to be released for FF E-mount
Lloyd's opinion corroborates the stellar MTF. Very soon Sony FE will realise the efforts of both companies these past two years and will carve out a niche market for serious enthusiasts interested in SOA prime lenses. Then - what comes next?
p.25 #13Zeiss "Batis" AF lens line to be released for FF E-mount
More Batis, more Loxia, more FE, more market share for Sony, more trouble for Canikon, who won't play the FF mirrorless game for fear of hurting their DSLR business.
p.25 #14Zeiss "Batis" AF lens line to be released for FF E-mount
Took a look at LC's samples on his free site - very very good, despite the subject matter not being the main purpose of the 85. Elegant indeed. Good that he mentioned the effects of curvature on bokeh, I agree with the idea that cross frame performance assists bokeh rendering.
An 18/2.8 next? I'd like to see a smallish 135/2.8 - Sony needs this lens in the system, and now with AF, a Batis looks a good bet at that FL, and they have an Otus level precedent lens in the 135/2 APO to key off. It's also a 'prestige' FL. We'll see.
p.25 #16Zeiss "Batis" AF lens line to be released for FF E-mount
mogul wrote:
SAR is reporting that the 85 may be a rebadged Tamron...seems everyone is getting in on the band wagon.
What SAR is reporting is that Tamron had a patent on an 11 element 8 group 85mm with stabilization, then they speculated that maybe Zeiss bought this patent/design. Not much to connect the dots here. Perhaps it happened, but I would think it is more likely that it didn't.
p.25 #17Zeiss "Batis" AF lens line to be released for FF E-mount
Steve Spencer wrote: mogul wroteSAR is reporting that the 85 may be a rebadged Tamron...seems everyone is getting in on the band wagon.What SAR is reporting is that Tamron had a patent on an 11 element 8 group 85mm with stabilization, then they speculated that maybe Zeiss bought this patent/design. Not much to connect the dots here. Perhaps it happened, but I would think it is more likely that it didn't.
Why? Sony has a major interest in Tamron and is partnered with Zeiss, this group has a large stake in making sure that the E mount has enough lenses to build out its line up. If it had a Tamron name on it Digilyold would not be waxing poetic of its qualities.
p.25 #18Zeiss "Batis" AF lens line to be released for FF E-mount
mogul wrote: Steve Spencer wrotemogul wroteSAR is reporting that the 85 may be a rebadged Tamron...seems everyone is getting in on the band wagon.What SAR is reporting is that Tamron had a patent on an 11 element 8 group 85mm with stabilization, then they speculated that maybe Zeiss bought this patent/design. Not much to connect the dots here. Perhaps it happened, but I would think it is more likely that it didn't.Why? Sony has a major interest in Tamron and is partnered with Zeiss, this group has a large stake in making sure that the E mount has enough lenses to build out its line up. If it a Tamron name on it Digilyold would not be waxing poetic of its qualities.
The why is lack of any evidence that Zeiss actually bought the patent let alone the design from Tamron. It is pure speculation. I think Zeiss has enough experience designing lenses they could design this lens in house. There is no suggestion the 25 is anything other than a Zeiss design. I could see them perhaps buying the stabilization technology from Tamron. That is something they haven't done before, but lens design is their thing, so I can't see them buying someone else's design.
p.25 #19Zeiss "Batis" AF lens line to be released for FF E-mount
mogul wrote: Steve Spencer wrotemogul wroteSAR is reporting that the 85 may be a rebadged Tamron...seems everyone is getting in on the band wagon.What SAR is reporting is that Tamron had a patent on an 11 element 8 group 85mm with stabilization, then they speculated that maybe Zeiss bought this patent/design. Not much to connect the dots here. Perhaps it happened, but I would think it is more likely that it didn't.Why? Sony has a major interest in Tamron and is partnered with Zeiss, this group has a large stake in making sure that the E mount has enough lenses to build out its line up. If it a Tamron name on it Digilyold would not be waxing poetic of its qualities.
None of that provides support for the claim that the Batis 85/1.8 was designed by Tamron, or is a rebadged Tamron. It might make it plausible or be a motification for Tamron, Zeiss, and/or Sony, but as Steve said, I don't see how it connects the dots.
As I understand it, the data we have:
1. The Batis 85mm f/1.8 has 11 elements and 8 groups
2. We don't have a schematic for the Batis yet.
3. Tamron has a patent for a mirrorless 85mm f/1.8 with 11 elements and 8 groups
I don't see how that's enough to conclude that Tamron has designed and/or built the Batis 85/1.8.
I personally don't care who designed the Batis lenses. I doubt I'll ever own one. If I planned on getting one, I don't think this would matter much to me if the performance was there.